The major objective of the work is to explore the mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphates (BCP), a biomaterial derived from marine resources like prawn (Fenneropenaeus Indicus) shell biowaste through wet chemical treatment of CaO. We report the BCP, a mixture of hydroxyapatite and octa calcium phosphate from prawn shell biowaste using wet chemical synthesis at 80°C under pH 10. XRD of BCP revealed the coexistence of secondary phases like β-TCP and α-TCP along with HA upon sintering at different temperatures. Furthermore, the SEM and EDS opened well-sintered uniaxial grains and the presence of trace elements like Fe, Mg, Si, and Na. The specimens sintered at 1100°C showed the highest compression strength of 56.8 MPa due to MgO at the grain boundaries, which plays an important role in grain boundary diffusion. Therefore, the prawn shell biowaste-derived BCP has good mechanical properties, making them suitable materials for high-strength bone substitutes.
PilliarRM, FiliaggiMJ, WellsJD, Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications — in vitro characterization. Biomaterials. 2001;22:963–972. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00261-1
2.
MozafariM, RabieeM, AzamiM, Biomimetic formation of apatite on the surface of porous gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;257:1740–1749. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.008
3.
TodrosS, TodescoM, BagnoA.Biomaterials and their biomedical applications: from replacement to regeneration. Processes. 2021;9:1949. doi:10.3390/pr9111949
4.
EliazN, MetokiN.Calcium phosphate bioceramics: A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials (Basel). 2017;10:334. doi:10.3390/ma10040334
5.
MachaIJ, Sevgi OzyeginL, ChouJ, An Alternative Synthesis Method for Di Calcium Phosphate (Monetite) Powders from Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) Shells, 2013. www.austceram.com/ACS-Journal.
6.
BogdanovicieneI, BeganskieneA, TõnsuaaduK, Calcium hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 ceramics prepared by aqueous sol–gel processing. Mater Res Bull. 2006;41:1754–1762. doi:10.1016/J.MATERRESBULL.2006.02.016
7.
IsmailH, MohamadH.Bioactivity and biocompatibility properties of sustainable wollastonite bioceramics from rice husk Ash/rice straw ash: a review. Mater (Basel). 2021;14:5193. doi:10.3390/ma14185193
8.
SalianSKP,A, DuttaS, MandalS.A roadmap to UV-protective natural resources: classification,: characteristics, and applications. Mater Chem Front. 2021;5:7696–7723. doi:10.1039/D1QM00741F
9.
ImpensS, SchelstraeteR, LuytenJ, Production and characterisation of porous calcium phosphate structures with controllable hydroxyapatite/ β -tricalcium phosphate ratios. Adv Appl Ceram. 2009;108:494–500. doi:10.1179/174367609X422243
10.
SossaPAF, GiraldoBS, GarciaBCG, Comparative study between natural and synthetic hydroxyapatite: structural, morphological and bioactivity properties. Revista Materia. 2018;23:1–17. doi:10.1590/s1517-707620180004.0551
11.
de SantisR, GloriaA, AmbrosioL.. Biomedical Composites. 2nd ed. Duxford (United Kingdom): Elsevier Inc.; 2017. Chapter 11, Composite materials for hip joint prostheses. p. 237–259.
12.
PajorK, PajchelL, KolmasJ.Hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite in conservative dentistry and oral implantology – a review. Materials. 2019;12:2683, doi:10.3390/ma12172683
13.
AkramM, AhmedR, ShakirI, Extracting hydroxyapatite and its precursors from natural resources. J Mater Sci. 2014;49:1461–1475. doi:10.1007/s10853-013-7864-x
14.
SzcześA, HołyszL, ChibowskiE.Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;249:321–330. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.007
15.
PokhrelS.Hydroxyapatite: preparation, properties and Its biomedical applications. Adv Chem Eng Sci. 2018;08:225–240. doi:10.4236/aces.2018.84016
16.
VenkatesanJ, AnilS.Hydroxyapatite derived from marine resources and their potential biomedical applications. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2021;26:312–324. doi:10.1007/s12257-020-0359-0
17.
Mohd Pu'adNAS, KoshyP, AbdullahHZ, Syntheses of hydroxyapatite from natural sources. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01588, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01588
18.
MilovacD, Gamboa-MartínezTC, IvankovicM, PCL-coated hydroxyapatite scaffold derived from cuttlefish bone: In vitro cell culture studies. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2014;42:264–272. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.034
19.
MondalS, MahataS, KunduS, Processing of natural resourced hydroxyapatite ceramics from fish scale. Adv Appl Ceram. 2010;109:234–239. doi:10.1179/174367509X12581069052090
20.
DaculsiG, LegerosRZ, NeryE, Transformation of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramicsin vivo: ultrastructural and physicochemical characterization. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23:883–894. doi:10.1002/jbm.820230806
21.
GallinettiS, CanalC, GinebraM.Development and characterization of biphasic hydroxyapatite/β- TCP cements. J Am Ceram Soc. 2014;97:1065–1073. doi:10.1111/jace.12861
22.
KannanS, Goetz-NeunhoefferF, NeubauerJ, Ionic substitutions in biphasic hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate mixtures: structural analysis by rietveld refinement. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;91:1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02117.x
23.
MofakhamiS, SalahinejadE.Biphasic calcium phosphate microspheres in biomedical applications. J Control Relesa. 2021;338:527–536. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.004
24.
BuschmannJ.Biomimetic phosphate nanocomposites for bone-tissue regeneration. In: Nanocomposites for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. Duxford (United Kingdom): Elsevier Inc.; 2016. p. 285–305. doi:10.1016/B978-1-78242-452-9.00013-3
25.
SabreeI, GoughJE, DerbyB.Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: influence of internal dimensions. Ceram Int. 2015;41:8425–8432. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.044
26.
Terkula IberB, Azman KasanN, TorsaboD, A review of various sources of chitin and chitosan in nature. J Renew Mater. 2022;10:1097–1123. doi:10.32604/jrm.2022.018142
27.
HadagalliK, KumarR, MandalS, Structural, compositional and spectral investigation of prawn exoskeleton nanocomposite: UV protection from mycosporine-like amino acids. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;249:123002. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123002
28.
WangW, YeungKWK.Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioact Mater. 2017;2:224–247. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007
29.
HadagalliK, PandaAK, MandalS, Faster biomineralization and tailored mechanical properties of marine-resource-derived hydroxyapatite scaffolds with tunable interconnected porous architecture. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2:2171–2184. doi:10.1021/acsabm.9b00151
30.
SafronovaTV, SeleznevaII, TikhonovaSA, Biocompatibility of biphasic α,β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro. Bioact Mater. 2020;5:423–427. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.007
31.
RabieiM, PaleviciusA, MonshiA, Comparing methods for calculating nano crystal size of natural hydroxyapatite using X-ray diffraction. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1–21. doi:10.3390/nano10091627
32.
CarrodeguasRG, De AzaS.α-Tricalcium phosphate: synthesis,: properties and biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3536–3546. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.019
33.
ChusueiCC, GoodmanDW, van StipdonkMJ, Calcium phosphate phase identification using XPS and time-of-flight cluster SIMS. Anal Chem. 1999;71:149–153. doi:10.1021/ac9806963
34.
NagpureIM, DuvenhageMM, PitaleSS, Synthesis, thermal and spectroscopic characterization of Caq2 (calcium 8-hydroxyquinoline) organic phosphor. J Fluoresc. 2012;22:1271–1279. doi:10.1007/s10895-012-1069-6
35.
OrtizCH, AperadorW, CaicedoJC.Electrochemical response of (β-TCP and HA) individual coatings and [β-TCP/HA] multilayers coatings exposed to biocompatible environments. Surf Coat Technol. 2022;435:128266. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128266
36.
BharathiKK, MoorthyB, DaraHK, Electrochemical properties of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 perovskite as an anode material for sodium ion batteries. J Mater Sci. 2019;54:13236–13246. doi:10.1007/s10853-019-03834-9
37.
DoraJK, NayakD, GhoshS, A facile and green synthesis approach to derive highly stable SiO x -hard carbon based nanocomposites for use as the anode in lithium-ion batteries. Sust Energ Fuel. 2020;4:6054–6065. doi:10.1039/D0SE01083A
38.
LaDD, PatwariJM, JonesLA, Fabrication of a GNP/Fe–Mg binary oxide composite for effective removal of arsenic from aqueous solution. ACS Omega. 2017;2:218–226. doi:10.1021/acsomega.6b00304
39.
LiuZ, QuS, ZhengX, Effect of polydopamine on the biomimetic mineralization of mussel-inspired calcium phosphate cement in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;44:44–51. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.063
40.
KalapsazovaML, ZhechevaEN, TyulievGT, Effects of the particle size distribution and of the electrolyte salt on the intercalation properties of P3-Na2/3Ni1/2Mn1/2O2. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:5931–5940. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12887
41.
DongG, ZhengY, HeL, The effect of silicon doping on the transformation of amorphous calcium phosphate to silicon-substituted α-tricalcium phosphate by heat treatment. Ceram Int. 2016;42:883–890. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.013
42.
TanCY, YaghoubiA, RameshS, Sintering and mechanical properties of MgO-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. Ceram Int. 2013;39:8979–8983. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.04.098
