Potassium bromide sodalite (KBr-SOD) zeolite has been developed to enhance the mechanical properties of these restorations using a direct in situ hydrothermal condition followed by the sintering process. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of sintering temperature on the microstructures and mechanical properties of porous alumina (A) and zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) discs infiltrated by KBr-SOD. Hundred and twenty disc-shaped samples were sintered at various temperatures and prepared for biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness tests. The results showed that sintering temperatures from 1100 to 1600°C for both A-SOD and ZTA-SOD samples has resulted in a significant improvement in the density (2.8 and 1.1%, respectively), flexural strength (257 and 254%, respectively), Vickers hardness (109 and 112%, respectively), and Weibull modulus (7.5 and 3%, respectively). The present study concludes that infiltrated SOD material sintered at 1600°C is suitable for the fabrication of all-ceramic dental prostheses with adequate mechanical properties.
LiuR, WangCA.Synthesis of aluminum-doped mesoporous zirconia with improved thermal stability. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2014;186:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.11.024
3.
GainAK, SongHY, LeeBT.Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous yttria stabilized zirconia ceramic using poly methyl methacrylate powder. Scr Mater. 2006;54(12):2081–2085. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.009
4.
SaremiM, AfrasiabiA, KobayashiA.Microstructural analysis of YSZ and YSZ/Al2O3 plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings after high temperature oxidation. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202(14):3233–3238. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.11.029
5.
HuL, WangCA, HuangY.Porous yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics with ultra-low thermal conductivity. J Mater Sci. 2010;45(12):3242–3246. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4331-9
6.
ChenF, CaoF, PanH, Mechanical and dielectric properties of silicon nitride ceramics with high and hierarchical porosity. Mater Des. 2012;40:562–566. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.026
7.
OhjiT, FukushimaM.Macro-porous ceramics: processing and properties. Int Mater Rev. 2012;57(2):115–131. doi: 10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000006
8.
FengY, WangK, YaoJ, Effect of the addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone as a pore-former on microstructure and mechanical strength of porous alumina ceramics. Ceram Int. 2013;39(7):7551–7556. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.007
9.
LiuR, LiY, WangCA, Fabrication of porous alumina–zirconia ceramics by gel-casting and infiltration methods. Mater Des. 2014;63:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.061
10.
OhjiT.Porous ceramic materials. In: SomiyasS, editor. Hand book of advanced ceramics. 2nd ed.Waltham, MA: Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 1131–1148.
11.
MarpleBR, GreenDJ.Graded compositions and microstructures by infiltration processing. J Mater Sci. 1993;28(17):4637–4643. doi: 10.1007/BF00414252
12.
TuWC, LangeFF.Liquid precursor infiltration processing of powder compacts: I, kinetic studies and microstructure development. J Am Ceram Soc. 1995;78(12):3277–3282. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb07965.x
13.
LinYJ, ChenYC.Cyclic infiltration of porous zirconia preforms with a liquid solution of mullite precursor. J Am Ceram Soc. 2001;84(1):71–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00610.x
14.
ClausH.Vita In-Ceram, a new system for producing aluminum oxide crown and bridge substructures. Quintessence Dent Technol. 1990;16:35–46.
15.
HornbergerH, MarquisPM.Mechanical properties and microstructure of In-Ceram, a ceramic-glass composite for dental crowns. Glass Sci Technol. 1995;68(6):188–194.
16.
McLarenEA, WhiteSN.Glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramic for crowns and fixed partial dentures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999;11(8):985–994.
17.
GuazzatoM, AlbakryM, QuachL, Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater. 2005;21(5):454–463. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.010
18.
GuazzatoM, AlbakryM, RingerSP, Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):449–456. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
19.
ChevalierJ, CalesB, DrouinJM.Low-temperature aging of Y-TZP ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82(8):2150–2154. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02055.x
20.
GuessPC, KulišA, WitkowskiS, Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1556–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.028
21.
BorchersL, StieschM, BachFW, Influence of hydrothermal and mechanical conditions on the strength of zirconia. Acta Biomater2010;6(12):4547–4552. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.025
22.
YaoJ, WangH, RatinacKR, Formation of colloidal hydroxy-sodalite nanocrystals by the direct transformation of silicalite nanocrystals. Chem Mater. 2006;18(6):1394–1396. doi: 10.1021/cm052731+
OcantoF, ÁlvarezR, de NavarroCU, Influence of the alkalinity and NO3−/Cl− anionic composition on the synthesis of the cancrinite–sodalite system. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2008;116(1):318–322. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.019
26.
EvsyuninVG, SapozhnikovAN, RastsvetaevaRK, Crystal structure of the potassium-rich hauyne from Arissia (Italy). Crystallogr Rep. 1996;41(4):622–625.
27.
KhajaviS, SartipiS, GasconJ, Thermostability of hydroxy sodalite in view of membrane applications. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2010;132(3):510–517. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.03.035
28.
CrucianiG.Zeolites upon heating: factors governing their thermal stability and structural changes. J Phys Chem Solids. 2006;67(9):1973–1994. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.057
29.
AlbertiA, MartucciA.Reconstructive phase transitions in microporous materials: rules and factors affecting them. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2011;141(1):192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.11.014
30.
AlbertiA, MartucciA.Phase transformations and structural modifications induced by heating in microporous materials. Stud Surf Sci Catal. 2005;155:19–43. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2991(05)80135-1
31.
KhajaviS, KapteijnF, JansenJC.Synthesis of thin defect-free hydroxy sodalite membranes: New candidate for activated water permeation. J Membr Sci. 2007;299(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.027
32.
SharpZD, HelffrichGR, BohlenSR, The stability of sodalite in the system NaAlSiO4-NaCl. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1989;53(8):1943–1954. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90315-3
33.
WellmanTR.The vapor pleasure of NaCl over decomposing sodalite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1969;33(10):1302–1303. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(69)90048-9
34.
VITA In-Ceram, VITA Zahnfabrik. Directions for use, Vita Zahnfabrik Publication #187E–1190 Bad Sackinge. Germany; 2007.
35.
I.O.f.S. (ISO) ISO 6872. Dentistry – Ceramic Materials; 2015.
36.
NajiGA, OmarRA, YahyaR, Sodalite zeolite as an alternative all-ceramic infiltrating material for alumina and zirconia toughened alumina frameworks. Ceram Int. 2016;42(10):12253–12261. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.171
37.
NajiGA, OmarRA, YahyaR.The effect of sodalite zeolite infiltrated material on the fracture toughness, elastic modulus and optical properties of all-ceramic dental prostheses. Ceram Int. 2016;42(16):18737–18746. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.013
38.
NajiGA, OmarRA, YahyaR.Influence of sodalite zeolite infiltration on the coefficient of thermal expansion and bond strength of all-ceramic dental prostheses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;67:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.007
39.
KwokK, KieselL, FrandsenHL, Strength characterization of tubular ceramic materials by flexure of semi-cylindrical specimens. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2014;34(5):1423–1432. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.12.005
40.
GuazzatoM, AlbakryM, SwainMV, Mechanical properties of in-ceram alumina and in-ceram zirconia. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(4):339–346.
41.
Al-MakramaniBMA.Clinical and mechanical evaluation of a new all-ceramic restorative material turkom-cera. Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur; 2010.
42.
NabaviMS, MohammadiT, KazemimoghadamM.Hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxy sodalite zeolite membrane: separation of H2/CH4. Ceram Int. 2014;40(4):5889–5896. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.11.033
43.
JulbeA, MotuzasJ, CazevielleF, Synthesis of sodalite/αAl2O3 composite membranes by microwave heating. Sep Purif Technol. 2003;32(1):139–149. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00027-3
44.
PulgarinHL, AlbanoMP.Three different alumina–zirconia composites: sintering, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;639:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.010
45.
NagaSM, HassanAM, El-MaghrabyHF, In-situ sintering reaction of Al2O3–LaAl11O18–ZrO2 composite. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater. 2016;54:230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.07.026
46.
ChandrasekharS, PramadaPN.Thermal studies of low silica zeolites and their magnesium exchanged forms. Ceram Int. 2002;28(2):177–186. doi: 10.1016/S0272-8842(01)00075-X
47.
ClarkeDR.Interpenetrating phase composites. J Am Ceram Soc. 1992;75(4):739–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04138.x
48.
GiordanoRA, PelletierL, CampbellS, Flexural strength of an infused ceramic. glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(5):411–418. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80067-8
49.
MaJF, WangSQ, DuRX, Pressureless sintering of gel cast ZTA-MgO-TiO2 systems as potential dental ceramics. Adv Appl Ceram. 2011;110:275–279. doi: 10.1179/1743676111Y.0000000010
50.
MollazadehS, JavadpourJ, Eftekhari YektaB, Synthesis and characterisation of dental composite materials reinforced with fluoroapatite-mullite glass-ceramic particles. Adv Appl Ceram. 2013;112:294–300. doi: 10.1179/1743676112Y.0000000075
51.
AnusaviceKJ, KakarK, FerreeN.Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(s3):218–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01460.x
52.
BanS, AnusaviceKJ.Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990;69(12):1791–1799. doi: 10.1177/00220345900690120201
53.
KellyJR.Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):103–110. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80043-3
