The incorporation of fly ash (FA) and wood ash (WA) in concrete as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) was studied. The chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement, FA and WA was determined according to ASTM C-114. SEM and optical microscopy were used for the analysis of concrete. Setting time, compressive strength, water absorption and acid resistance of the concrete with different percentages of SCM ranging from 0 to 60% were evaluated. The results obtained showed that setting time and rate of water absorption increased with the increase in percentage of SCM. After 7 and 28 days, the compressive strength of concrete with 20% FA as SCM was higher than that with substitution with 20% WA. Resistance of concrete against sulphate attack increased with an increase in the percentage of FA. It was found that incorporating more than 20% WA resulted in a decrease in sulphate attack resistance.
OseiDY, JacksonEN. Compressive strength and workability of concrete using natural pozzolana as partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2012;3:3658–3662.
2.
GreggJS, AndresRJ, MarlandG. China: emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geo Phys Res Lett. 2008;35:1–5. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032887
3.
RushtonL. Health hazards and waste management. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:183–197. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg034
4.
VrijheidM. Health effects of residence near hazardous waste landfill sites: a review of epidemiologic literature. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:101–112. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s1101
5.
DingA, ZhangZ, FuJ, Biological control of leachate from municipal landfills. Chemosphere. 2001;44:1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00377-5
6.
RashadAM. A brief on high-volume Class F fly ash as cement replacement – a guide for civil engineer. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2015;4:278–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.10.002
7.
ZacharJ. Sustainable and economical precast and prestressed concrete using fly ash as a cement replacement. J Mater Civ Eng. 2011;23:789–792. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000243
8.
TsadoT, YewaM, YamanS, Comparative analysis of properties of some artificial pozzolana in concrete production. Int J Eng Technol. 2014;4:251–255.
9.
PayaJ, MonzoJ, BorracheroMV, Sugar-cane bagasse ash (SCBA): studies on its properties for reusing in concrete production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2002;77:321–325. doi: 10.1002/jctb.549
10.
Sanchez de RojasMI, RiveraJ, FriasM, Use of recycled copper slag for blended cements. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83:209–217. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1830
11.
JuengerMC, SiddiqueR. Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2015;78:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.018
12.
ScrivenerKL, KirkpatrickRJ. Innovation in use and research on cementitious material. Cem Concr Res. 2008;38:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.025
13.
GartnerE. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34:1489–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021
14.
ElahiA, BasheerP, NanukuttanS, Mechanical and durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24:292–299. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.045
15.
AhmadiB, ShekarchiM. Use of natural zeolite as a supplementary cementitious material. Cem Concr Comp. 2010;32:134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.006
16.
IyerR, ScottJ. Power station fly ash – a review of value-added utilization outside of the construction industry. Resour Conser Recycl. 2001;31:217–228. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00084-7
17.
ZamanS, Shahid AhmadS. Wood supply and demand analysis in Pakistan – key issues. Manag Nat Res Sustain Future Agri. 2012;4:1–12.
18.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Standard no. ASTM C618. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2008.
19.
SorokaI. The determination of setting time of portland cement by the vicat test. Cem Concr Res. 1984;14:884–886. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(84)90015-2
20.
SleimanH, PerrotA, AmzianeS. A new look at the measurement of cementitious paste setting by Vicat test. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:681–686. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.12.001
21.
British Standards Institution (BSI). Part 3. Testing hardened concrete: compressive strength of test specimens. Standard no. BS 12390. London: BSI; 2002.
22.
YanS, Sagoe-CrentsilK, ShapiroG. Properties of cement mortar incorporating de-inking waste-water from waste paper recycling. Constr Build Mater. 2012;29:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.012
23.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. Standard no. ASTM C642. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2001.
Meghat JohariaMA, BrooksJJ, KabiraS, Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on engineering properties of high strength concrete. Const Build Mater. 2011;25:2639–2648. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.013
26.
British Standards Institution (BSI). Methods of testing cement-part 3: determination of setting time and soundness. Standard no. BS EN 196-3. Turkey: BSI; 2002.
