The relative impact and interaction of two components, gypsum and water, in high ye'elimite containing calcium sulphoaluminate-belite cement pastes at an age of 7 days was studied to find the optimum conditions for compressive strength. Using statistical analysis of 149 compressive strength results having a range of water and gypsum contents, the statistical significance of the variables was investigated. X-ray diffraction analysis demonstrated the different hydration processes occurring within samples based on water and gypsum contents, while mercury intrusion porosimetry comparison confirmed the importance of pore structure towards determining ultimate paste strength. Thermodynamic modelling was also used to contribute to the understanding of the microstructural development. The compressive strengths of cement pastes with varying gypsum and water content were shown to be influenced by both factors, with a non-linear dependence on gypsum content observed.
JuengerMCG, WinnefeldF, ProvisJL, Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(12):1232–1243.
2.
ShiC, JiménezAF, PalomoA. New cements for the 21st century: the pursuit of an alternative to portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(7):750–763. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
3.
GartnerE. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(9):1489–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021
4.
ShermanN, BeretkaJ, SantoroL, Long-term behaviour of hydraulic binders based on calcium sulfoaluminate and calcium sulfosilicate. Cem Concr Res. 1995;25(1):113–126. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)00119-J
5.
GlasserFP, ZhangL. High-performance cement matrices based on calcium sulfoaluminate-belite compositions. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31(12):1881–1886. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00649-4
6.
TelescaA, MarroccoliM, PaceML, A hydration study of various calcium sulfoaluminate cements. Cem Concr Compos. 2014;53:224–232. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.002
7.
BeretkaJ, MarroccoliM, ShermanN, The influence of C4A3S̄ content and W/S ratio on the performance of calcium sulfoaluminate-based cements. Cem Concr Res. 1996;26(11):1673–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00164-0
8.
BizzozeroJ, GosselinC, ScrivenerKL. Expansion mechanisms in calcium aluminate and sulfoaluminate systems with calcium sulfate. Cem Concr Res. 2014;56:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.011
9.
WangY, SumM. The third series cement in china. Proceedings of the 3rd Beijing International Symposium on Cement and Concrete; 1993, 3, p. 116–121.
10.
ZhangL, SuM, WangY. Development of the use of sulfo- and ferroaluminate cements in china. Adv Cem Res. 1999;11(1):15–21. doi: 10.1680/adcr.1999.11.1.15
11.
JC 714 1996. Rapid hardening sulphoaluminate cement. Professional standard of building materials industry of People's Republic of China. 1997.
12.
PéraJ, AmbroiseJ. New applications of calcium sulfoaluminate cement. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(4):671–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.019
13.
GastaldiD, CanonicoF, BoccaleriE. Ettringite and calcium sulfoaluminate cement: investigation of water content by near-infrared spectroscopy. J Mater Sci. 2009;44(21):5788–5794. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3812-1
14.
HargisCW, KirchheimAP, MonteiroPJM, Early age hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate (synthetic ye'elimite, C4A3S̄) in the presence of gypsum and varying amounts of calcium hydroxide. Cem Concr Res. 2013;48:105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.001
15.
HargisCW, TelescaA, MonteiroPJM. Calcium sulfoaluminate (ye'elimite) hydration in the presence of gypsum, calcite, and vaterite. Cem Concr Res. 2014;65:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.004
16.
WinnefeldF, BarlagS. Calorimetric and thermogravimetric study on the influence of calcium sulfate on the hydration of ye'elimite. J Therm Anal Calor. 2010;101(3):949–957. doi: 10.1007/s10973-009-0582-6
17.
QuillinK. Performance of belite–sulfoaluminate cements. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31(9):1341–1349. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00543-9
18.
LiuZ, LiX, DengD, The damage of calcium sulfoaluminate cement paste partially immersed in MgSO4 solution. Mater Struct. 2015;49(1):719–727.
19.
PaulG, BoccaleriE, BuzziL, Friedel's salt formation in sulfoaluminate cements: a combined XRD and 27Al MAS NMR study. Cem Concr Res. 2015;67:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.08.004
20.
ChenIA, HargisCW, JuengerMCG. Understanding expansion in calcium sulfoaluminate–belite cements. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.010
21.
BergerS, CoumesCCD, Le BescopP, Influence of a thermal cycle at early age on the hydration of calcium sulphoaluminate cements with variable gypsum contents. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(2):149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.001
22.
TrauchessecR, MechlingJ, LecomteA, Impact of anhydrite proportion in a calcium sulfoaluminate cement and portland cement blend. Adv Cem Res. 2014;26(6):325–333. doi: 10.1680/adcr.13.00051
23.
MichelM, GeorginJF, AmbroiseJ, The influence of gypsum ratio on the mechanical performance of slag cement accelerated by calcium sulfoaluminate cement. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(3):1298–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.015
24.
García-MatéM, SantacruzI, De La TorreAG, Rheological and hydration characterization of calcium sulfoaluminate cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos. 2012;34(5):684–691. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.008
25.
AlaouiA, FerailleA, DimassiA, Experimental study of sulfoaluminate concrete based materials Proceedings: Concrete under severe conditions (France). 2007:909–916.
26.
BernardoG, TelescaA, ValentiGL. A porosimetric study of calcium sulfoaluminate cement pastes cured at early ages. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(6):1042–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.02.014
GalanI, BeltaguiH, Garcia-MateM, Impact of drying on pore structures in ettringite-rich cements. Cem Concr Res. 2015.
29.
ZhangL, GlasserFP. Critical examination of drying damage to cement pastes. Adv Cem Res. 2000;12(2):79–88. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2000.12.2.79
30.
DiamondS. Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(10):1517–1525. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00370-7
31.
YoonS, MonteiroPJM, MacpheeDE, Statistical evaluation of the mechanical properties of high-volume class F fly ash concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2014;54:432–442. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.077
32.
MaH. Mercury intrusion porosimetry in concrete technology: tips in measurement, pore structure parameter acquisition and application. J Porous Mater.2014;21(2):207–215. doi: 10.1007/s10934-013-9765-4
WagnerT, KulikDA, HingerlFF, DmytrievaSV.GEM-selektor geochemical modeling package: T SolMod library and data interface for multicomponent phase models. Can Mineral. 2012;50(5):1173–1195. doi: 10.3749/canmin.50.5.1173
37.
MatscheiT, LothenbachB, GlasserFP. Thermodynamic properties of portland cement hydrates in the system CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-CaSO4-CaCO3-H2O. Cem Concr Res. 2007;37(10):1379–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.002
LothenbachB, MatscheiT, MöschnerG, Thermodynamic modelling of the effect of temperature on the hydration and porosity of portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 2008;38(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.017
40.
BabushkinVI, MatveyevGM, Mchedlov-PetrossyanOP. Thermodynamics of silicates. Berlin: Springer- Verlag; 1985.
41.
SchmidtT, LothenbachB, RomerM, Physical and microstructural aspects of sulfate attack on ordinary and limestone blended portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(12):1111–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.005
42.
WangW, ChenX, ChenY, Calculation and verification for the thermodynamic data of 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4. Chin J Chem Eng. 2011;19(3):489–495. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60011-6
43.
BalonisM, GlasserFP. The density of cement phases. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(9):733–739. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.06.005
