Alumina/mullite ceramic nanocomposites were prepared by the mixtures of nano-sized starting powders of alumina with silica and alumina with silicon carbide. Silica from deliberate addition and as the product of silicon carbide oxidation reacted completely with alumina to form mullite. Silica from direct addition segregated at the grain boundary and intergranular mullite was formed whereas silica from oxidation was surrounded by alumina matrix and intragranular mullite was formed after reaction sintering. The most significant difference was fracture behaviour where intragranular mullite nanoparticles promoted transgranular fracture in alumina matrix due to thermal mismatch around nanoparticles and intergranular mullite nanoparticles gave rise to intergranular fracture similar to pure alumina. Wear resistance of the nanocomposites was better than that of alumina. Pull-out formation in the nanocomposites was less and pull-out size was also smaller. Fracture toughness of the nanocomposites was significantly higher than that of alumina.
LuoH. H., ZhangF. C. and RobertsS. G.: ‘Wear resistance of reaction sintered alumina/mullite composites’, Mat. Sci. Eng. A.-Struct., 2008, 478, 270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.104
4.
ŠvančárekP., LendvayováS., GalusekD., HnatkoM., VávraI. and WangX.: ‘Abrasive wear resistance of SiO2-doped polycrystalline alumina’, Wear, 2011, 271, 760–769. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.03.016
5.
Burgo-MontesO., MorenoR. and BaudínC.: ‘Effect of mullite additions on fracture mode of alumina’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2010, 30, 857–863. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.10.013
6.
ZhangF. C., LuoH. H., WangT. S., ZhangM. and SunY. N.: ‘Stress state and fracture behavior of alumina–mullite intragranular particulate composites’, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2008, 68, (15–16), 3245–3250. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.012
7.
HemraK. and AungkavattanaP.: ‘Effect of zirconia content on mechanical and thermal properties of mullite–zirconia composites’, Adv. Appl. Ceram., 2014, 113, (6), 323–327. doi: 10.1179/1743676114Y.0000000164
8.
NagaS. M., HassanA. M., El-MaghrabyH. F., AwaadM. and ElsayedH.: ‘In-situ sintering reaction of Al2O3–LaAl11O18–ZrO2 composite’, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., 2016, 54, 230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.07.026
9.
BarseghyanS. A. and SakkaY.: ‘Mechanochemical activation of aluminum powder and synthesis of alumina based ceramic composites’, Ceram. Int., 2013, 39, 8141–8146. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.087
10.
WangY., LiuH., ChengH. and WangJ.: ‘Densification behavior and microstructure of mullite obtained from diphasic Al2O3–SiO2 gels’, Ceram. Int., 2014, 40, 12789–12796. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.133
11.
SakkaY., BidingerD. D. and AskayI. A.: ‘Processing of silicon carbide–mullite–alumina nanocomposites’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1995, 78, 479–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08827.x
12.
Ortiz-MerinoJ. L. and ToddR. I.: ‘Relationship between wear rate, surface pullout and microstructure during abrasive wear of alumina and alumina/SiC nanocomposites’, Acta Mater., 2005, 53, 3345–3357. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.031
13.
AnstisG. R., ChantikulP., LawnB. R. and MarshallD. B.: ‘A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I, direct crack measurements’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1981, 64, 533–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x
14.
RiedelR., TomaL., FaselC. and MieheG.: ‘Polymer-derived mullite–SiC-based nanocomposites’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2009, 29, 3079–3090. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.05.016
15.
LouetN., ReveronH. and FantozziG.: ‘Sintering behaviour and microstructural evolution of ultrapure α-alumina containing low amounts of SiO2’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2008, 28, 205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.04.015
16.
GalusekD., TwiggP. C. and RileyF. L.: ‘Wet erosion of liquid phase sintered alumina’, Wear, 1999, 233–235, 588–595. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00236-7
17.
LimpichaipanitA., JiansirisomboonS. and TunkasiriT.: ‘Sintering temperature–microstructure–property relationships of alumina matrix composites with silicon carbide and silica additives’, Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. doi: 10.1515/secm-2014-0353.
18.
LimpichaipanitA. and ToddR. I.: ‘The relationship between microstructure, fracture and abrasive wear in Al2O3/SiC nanocomposites and microcomposites containing 5 and 10% SiC’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2009, 29, 2841–2848. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.023
19.
WinnA. J. and ToddR. I.: ‘Microstructural requirements for alumina–SiC nanocomposites’, Brit. Ceram. Trans., 1999, 98, 219–224. doi: 10.1179/096797899680471
20.
MarpleB. R. and GreenD. J.: ‘Mullite/alumina particulate composites by infiltration processing: III, mechanical properties’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1991, 74, 2453–2459. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06784.x
21.
JiaoS., JenkinsM. L. and DavidgeR. W.: ‘Electron microscopy of crack/particle interactions in Al2O3/SiC nanocomposites’, J. Microsc., 1997, 185, 259–264. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.d01-610.x
22.
SedláčekJ., GalusekD., ŠvančárekP., RiedelR., AtkinsonA. and WangX.: ‘Abrasive wear of Al2O3–SiC and Al2O3–(SiC)–C composites with micrometer- and submicrometer-sized alumina matrix grains’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2008, 28, 2983–2993. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.04.018
23.
P. Hvizdoš, P. Tatarko, A. Duszova and J. Dusza: ‘Failure mechanisms of ceramic nanocomposites’, in ‘Ceramic Nanocomposites’, (ed. R. Banerjee and R. Manna), 117–1522013, Cambridge, Woodhead Publishing.
