In this article, we introduce the concept of substate populism to account for dynamics in which populist speech is used to critique national elites for harming the interests of the ‘pure’ local people. We also identify three preconditions for substate populism: decentralisation, preexisting resentment or anxiety, and the capacity to dominate the local narrative. We explore the concept through a comparison of the frames used by Narendra Modi while serving as the chief minister of the state of Gujarat in India and Melis Myrzakmatov while serving as the mayor of Osh, Kyrgyzstan. We demonstrate that in both cases Modi and Myrzakmatov utilised substate populism following deadly ethnic riots to articulate local resentments, maintain popular support, and delegitimise external efforts to promote post-conflict reconciliation. We argue that through eradicating at least one of the three identified preconditions, a national government can undermine substate populism.
AslanidisP.2016, ‘Populist Social Movements of the Great Recession’ in Mobilization21: 301–321.
2.
AslanidisP.2017, ‘Avoiding Bias in the Study of Populism’ in Chinese Political Science Review2: 266–287.
3.
BaishyaA.K.2015, ‘#NaMo: The Political Work of the Selfie in the 2014 Indian General Elections’ in International Journal of Communication9: 1686–1700.
4.
BhattS.R.2011, Affidavit filed on 14 April 2011 with the Supreme Court of India, Special Leave Petition1088: Smt. Zakia Ahsan Jafri and Anr. Petitioners Versus State of Gujarat & Ors. Respondents.
5.
BobbioT.2012, ‘Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, Development and the Rise of Subnationalism in India’ in Third World Quarterly33: 657–672.
6.
BonikowskiB. & GidronN.2016, ‘The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952–1996’ in Social Forces94: 1593–1621.
7.
BrancatiD.2009, Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict through Decentralization, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8.
BrubakerR.1996, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe, New York:Cambridge University Press.
9.
BunceV.1999, Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State, New York:Cambridge University Press.
10.
CornellS.E.2002, ‘Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective’ in World Politics54: 245–276.
11.
Ferghana.ru2010, ‘Kyrgyzstan: Mer Osha Melis Myrzakmatov zayavil na mitinge, chto ostaetsya na svoem postu’ [Kyrgyzstan: Osh Mayor Melis Myrzakmatov Says at Rally that he Remains at his Post] in Ferghana.ru, 20 August: http://www.fergananews.com/news.php?id=15404&mode=snews, accessed 10 March 2018.
12.
Ferghana.ru2013, ‘Kyrgyzstan's Osh Mayor Myrzakmatov: The City Savior and Man of Year?’ in Ferghana.ru, 10 January: http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2808, accessed 10 March 2018.
13.
GiulianoE.2011, Constructing Grievance: Ethnic Nationalism in Russia's Republics, Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
GulletteD. & HeathershawJ.2015, ‘The Affective Politics of Sovereignty: Reflecting on the 2010 Conflict in Kyrgyzstan’ in Nationalities Papers43: 122–139.
16.
HarrowellE.2015, ‘From Monuments to Mahallas: Contrasting Memories in the Urban Landscape of Osh, Kyrgyzstan’ in Social & Cultural Geography16: 203–225.
17.
HawkinsK.A.2009, ‘Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective’ in Comparative Political Studies42: 1040–1067.
18.
HiermanB.2015, ‘Central Asian Ethnicity Compared: Evaluating the Contemporary Social Salience of Uzbek Identity in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan’ in Europe-Asia Studies67: 519–539.
19.
Human Rights Watch2002, ‘We Have No Orders To Save You. State Participation and Complicity in Communal Violence in Gujarat’, Human Rights Watch Report, Vol. 14, No. 3Special Issue: Authoritarian Populism and Atavistic Nationalism: 21st Century Challenges to Peacebuilding and Development.
20.
ICG2012, ‘Kyrgyzstan: Widening Ethnic Divisions in the South’, Asia Report No. 222, 29 March.
21.
JaffrelotC.2003, ‘Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?’, Working Paper 17, Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics.
22.
JaffrelotC.2008, ‘Gujarat: The Meaning of Modi's Victory’ in Economic & Political Weekly43: 15: 12–17.
23.
JaffrelotC.2012, ‘Gujarat 2002: What Justice for the Victims? The Supreme Court, the SIT, the Police and the State Judiciary’ in Economic & Political Weekly47: 8: 77–89.
24.
JaffrelotC.2016, ‘Narendra Modi between Hindutva and Subnationalism: The Gujarati Asmita of a Hindu Hriday Samrat’ in India Review15: 196–217.
25.
KarbekovK.2010, ‘Direktivy pravitel'stva ne imeyut na yuge yuridicheskoy sily’ [Government Directives Do Not have Legal Force in the South] in Kommersant, 19 August: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1489447, accessed 9 March 2018.
26.
KennyP.D.2017, Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
LaruelleM.2012, ‘The Paradigm of Nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving Narrative, the Sovereignty Issue, and Political Agenda’ in Communist and Post-Communist Studies45: 39–49.
MazzoleniG.2008, ‘Populism and the Media’ in AlbertazziD. & McDonnellD. eds, Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan:49–64.
32.
MegoranN.2012, ‘Averting Violence in Kyrgyzstan: Understanding and Responding to Nationalism’ in Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper 2012/03, Chatham House.
MoffittB.2016, The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation, Stanford:Stanford University Press.
35.
MuddeC.2004, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’ in Government and Opposition39: 541–563.
36.
MuddeC. & KaltwasserC.R.2017, Populism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
37.
MukhopadhyayN.2013, Narendra Modi: The Man, the Times, New Delhi:Tranquebar.
38.
MüllerJ.W.2016, What Is Populism?, Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
39.
MyrzakmatovM.2011, V poiskakh istiny. Oshkaya tragediya: dokumenty, fakty, interv'yu, obrashcheniya i zayavleniya [In Search of the Truth. The Osh Tragedy: Documents, Facts, Appeals and Declarations], Bishkek:Turar.
40.
PetersenR.D.2011, Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict, New York:Cambridge University Press.
41.
Podol'skayaD.2010, ‘Melis Myrzakmatov: V Kyrgyzstane deystvuet narodovlastie, i vopros o moey otstavke budet reshat’ tol'ko narod’ [We Have Democracy in Kyrgyzstan, and My Resignation will be Decided Only by the People] in 24.kg, 29 July: https://24.kg/archive/ru/osh/79670-melis%20myrzakmatov-v-kyrgyzstane/, accessed 9 March 2018.
42.
RoederP.G.1998, ‘Liberalization and Ethnic Entrepreneurs in the Soviet Successor States’ in CrawfordB. & LipschutzR. eds, The Myth of Ethnic Conflict, Berkeley:University of California Press:78–107.
43.
RooduijnM.2014, ‘The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator’ in Government and Opposition49: 573–599.
SnyderJ. & BallentineK.1996, ‘Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas’ in International Security21: 2: 5–40.
46.
SubramanianN.1999, Ethnicity and Populist Mobilization: Political Parties, Citizens and Democracy in South India, New Delhi:Oxford University Press.
47.
TishkovV.1995, ‘“Don't Kill Me, I'm a Kyrgyz!”: An Anthropological Analysis of Violence in the Osh Ethnic Conflict’ in Journal of Peace Research32: 133–149.
48.
WeylandK.2001, ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’ in Comparative Politics34: 1–22.
