An indispensable part of the liberal peacebuilding package is rebuilding effective and meritocratic administrative structures. This paper analyses building state institutions in Afghanistan with a focus on the role of warlords in the process. The findings are based on in-depth interviews conducted from 2012 to 2016 in five different provinces of Afghanistan. The paper uses neopatrimonialism as an analytical framework to shed light on our understanding of warlords’ influence on building state institutions in a war-torn country such as Afghanistan. The paper argues that warlords have played a major role in the formation of neopatrimonialism in the country, a system that has proven pervasive, flexible and resistant to change. Additionally, this paper contends that neopatrimonial networks centred on warlords have been relatively effective in delivering services to those within the network while excluding others, nonetheless creating enough legitimacy and support to survive. Overall, this neopatrimonial system excludes some segments of the population and is very difficult to reform to make it more inclusive.
BayartJ.-F., EllisS. & HibouB.1999, The Criminalization of the State in Africa (first edition reprint), Oxford: Boydell & Brewer.
3.
BluntP. & KhamooshS.2016, ‘Vexatious Voice: The Politics of Downward Accountability and Subnational Governance Reform in Afghanistan’ in Progress in Development Studies16: 1: 81–100.
4.
BluntP., TurnerM. & LindrothH.2012, ‘Patronage's Progress in Post-Soeharto Indonesia’ in Public Administration and Development32: 1: 64–81.
5.
BoegeV., BrownM.A. & ClementsK.P.2009, ‘Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States’ in Peace Review21: 1: 13–21.
6.
BrattonM. & Van de WalleN.1994, ‘Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’ in World Politics46: 4: 453–489.
7.
ChengC.2012, ‘Private and Public Interests: Informal Actors, Informal Influence, and Economic Order after War’ in BerdalM. & ZaumD. eds, Political Economy of Statebuilding: Power after Peace, New York: Routledge: 63–79.
8.
ClaphamC.S.1985, Third World Politics: An Introduction, University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
DivjakB. & PughM.2008, ‘The Political Economy of Corruption in Bosnia and Herzegovina’ in International Peacekeeping15: 3: 373–386.
10.
EnglehartN. & GrantP.2015, ‘Governors, Governance, and Insurgency in Karzai's Afghanistan: The Limits of Professionalism’ in Asian Survey55: 2: 299–324.
11.
ErdmannG. & EngelU.2007, ‘Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered: Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept’ in Commonwealth & Comparative Politics45: 1: 95–119.
12.
FairweatherJ.2014, The Good War: Why We Couldn't Win the War or the Peace in Afghanistan, New York: Basic Books.
GiustozziA.2009, Empires of Mud, London: Hurst & Company.
17.
GiustozziA. & MangalS.2014, ‘Violence, the Taliban, and Afghanistan's 2014 Elections’, Peaceworks Report No. 103, United States Institute of Peace: http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo58358
18.
GlaserB.G. & StraussA.L.1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, London & New York: Aldine.
19.
GrimmS.2008, ‘External Democratization after War: Success and Failure’ in Democratization15: 3: 525–549.
20.
HellmanJ.S., JonesG. & KaufmannD.2003, ‘Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture and Influence in Transition Economies’ in Journal of Comparative Economics31: 4: 751–773.
21.
JacksonA.2015, ‘Politics and Governance in Afghanistan: The Case of Kandahar’, Working Paper 34, Researching Livelihoods and Services Affected by Conflict. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/53a7d2c34.pdf.
22.
KurerO.2005, ‘Corruption: An Alternative Approach to Its Definition and Measurement’ in Political Studies53: 1: 222–239.
23.
Le BillonP.2001, ‘The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflict’ in Political Geography20: 561–584.
24.
Le BillonP.2008, ‘Diamond Wars? Conflict Diamonds and Geographies of Resource Wars’ in Annals of the Association of American Geographers98: 2: 345–372.
25.
Mac GintyR.2010, ‘Hybrid Peace: The Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace’ in Security Dialogue41: 4: 391–412.
Payame Aftab2016, ‘Payam-e Aftab: Ismail Khan: Hokmat bayad be mujahidin sahm dahad/Nesbat be goftogo haye chahar janemba khosbin nistam’ [The government should give the Mujahidin a share], 15 March: http://www.payam-aftab.com, accessed 18 April 2018.
31.
PitcherA., MoranM.H. & JohnstonM.2009, ‘Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism in Africa’ in African Studies Review52: 1: 125–156.
32.
RahnooshR.2015, ‘Britania: Mujahidin bazigaran-e asli-e siasi hastand’ [Great Britain: The Mujahidin are the real political players] [News Website]: Khama Press Feb 6, 2015, https://www.khaama.com/persian/archives/23081, accessed 18 April 2018.
33.
RenoW.1999, Warlord Politics and African States, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
SimonsenS.G.2004, ‘Ethnicising Afghanistan? Inclusion and Exclusion in post-Bonn Institution Building’ in Third World Quarterly25: 4: 707–729.
36.
StraussA. & CorbinJ.M.1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, USA: SAGE Publications.
37.
SuhrkeA.2009, ‘The Dangers of a Tight Embrace: Externally Assisted Statebuilding in Afghanistan’ in ParisR. & SiskT.D. eds, The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, London/New York: Routledge: 227–252.
38.
WeberM.1978, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
WeidnerE.W.1964, Technical Assistance in Public Administration Overseas: The Case for Development Administration, Chicago: Public Administration Service.
40.
WeingrodA.1968, ‘Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties’ in Comparative Studies in Society and History10: 4: 377–400.
41.
World Bank1997, World Development Report 1997, New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
YakovlevA.2006, ‘The Evolution of Business-State Interaction in Russia: From State Capture to Business Capture?’ in Europe-Asia Studies58: 7: 1033–1056.
