Cultural and linguistic repression of Kurdish ethnic identity rests at the heart of the conflict between the Turkish state and the Kurdish movement in Turkey's Kurdish region, also known as Northern Kurdistan. Inspired by Peet and Hartwick's conceptualisation of alternative development, combined with Gandhi's idea of the constructive programme and Galtung's conceptualisation of positive peace, this article investigates intersections between peace, development and resistance. The discussion is informed and developed by illuminating two empirical cases of what will be argued should be seen as ‘constructive resistance’ conducted by the Kurdish movement. Both cases seek to undermine repressive Turkish assimilation policies. This article shows how social movements, through constructive resistance practices, can be understood as central actors in processes of social and political transformation, termed ‘self-organised development’.
AkkayaA.H. & JongerdenJ.2012, ‘Reassembling the Political: The PKK and the Project of Radical Democracy’ in European Journal of Turkish Studies14: https://ejts.revues.org/4615, accessed 4 September 2017.
2.
AlmairacL.2006, ‘Turkey: A Minority Policy of Systematic Negation’, International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) and IHF Research Foundation Report, Vienna.
CoetzeeW. & SöderbaumF.2016, ‘Nordic Development Studies: Lessons, Pitfalls and Future Directions’ in Strategic Review for Southern Africa38: 1: 126–137.
DuncombeS.2002, Cultural Resistance Reader, London: Verso.
9.
EscobarA.1995, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
GaltungJ.1964, ‘An Editorial’ in Journal of Peace Research1: 1: 1–4.
11.
GaltungJ.1969, ‘Violence, Peace and Peace Research’ in Journal of Peace Research6: 3: 167–191.
12.
GaltungJ.1990, ‘Cultural Violence’ in Journal of Peace Research27: 3: 291–305.
13.
GaltungJ. & NässA.1968, Gandhis Politiske Etikk, Drammen: Pax Forlag.
14.
GandhiM.K.1945, Constructive Programme: Its Meaning and Place, Delhi: The Navajivan Trust.
15.
GeertzC.1998, ‘Deep Hanging Out’ in The New York Review of Books45: 16: 69–72.
16.
GraeberD.2009, Direct Action: An Ethnography, Oakland: AK Press.
17.
HassanpourA.2012, ‘The Indivisibility of the Nation and Its Linguistic Divisions’ in ‘The Kurdish Linguistic Landscape: Vitality, Linguicide and Resistance’ special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language2012: 217: 49–73.
18.
HassanpourA., SheyholislamiJ. & Skutnabb-KangasT.2012, ‘Kurdish: Linguicide, Resistance and Hope’ in ‘The Kurdish Linguistic Landscape: Vitality, Linguicide and Resistance’ special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language2012: 217: 1–18.
19.
HollanderJ.A. & EinwohnerR.L.2004, ‘Conceptualizing Resistance’ in Sociological Forum19: 4: 533–554.
20.
HollowayJ.2010, Crack Capitalism, New York: Pluto Press.
KayaN.2015, ‘Discrimination: Based on Colour, Ethnic Origin, Language, Religion and Belief in Turkey's Education System’, Tarih Vakfi and the Minority Rights Group International (MRG) Report, Istanbul.
26.
KurbanD.2007, ‘A Quest for Equality: Minorities in Turkey’, Minority Rights Group International Report, Istanbul.
27.
LundqvistM.2015, ‘Everyday Conceptualizations of Sustainable Peace in Nepal: Post-Liberal Peace and Beyond?’ in Asia in Focus1: 1: 45–52.
28.
NussbaumM.2011, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
ÖcalanA.2011, Democratic Confederalism, London and Cologne: Transmedia Publishing.
30.
PeetR. & HartwickE.2009, Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives, New York: The Guilford Press.
31.
RahnemaM.1997, ‘Towards Post-Development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms’ in RahnemaM. & BawtreeV. eds, The Post-Development Reader, London: Zed: 377–404.
32.
RahnemaM. & BawtreeV.1997 eds, The Post-Development Reader, London: Zed.
33.
RichmondO.2009, ‘A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday’ in Review of International Studies35: 557–580.
34.
RichmondO.2010, ‘Resistance and the Post-Liberal Peace’ in Millennium: Journal of International Studies38: 3: 665–692.
35.
RichmondO.2011, A Post-Liberal Peace, London and New York: Routledge.
36.
SachsW.1992 ed., The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, 1st edn, London and New York: Zed Books.
37.
ScholteJ.A. & SöderbaumF.2017, ‘A Changing Global Development Agenda?’ in Forum for Development Studies44: 1: 1–12.
38.
SeymourS.2006, ‘Resistance’ in Anthropological Theory6: 3: 303–321.
39.
SharpG.1973, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, Boston: Porter Sargent.
Skutnabb-KangasT.2000, Linguistic Genocide in Education: Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights?, New York: Routledge.
42.
UvinP.2002, ‘The Development/Peacebuilding Nexus: A Typology and History of Changing Paradigms’ in Journal of Peacebuilding and Development1: 1: 5–24.
43.
VinthagenS.2015, ‘Editorial: Some Notes on the Journal of Resistance Studies and Its Exploration of “Resistance”’ in Journal of Resistance Studies1: 2: 5–11.
44.
WhiteP.2015, The PKK: Coming Down from the Mountains, London: Zed Books.
45.
YarkinG.2015, ‘The Ideological Transformation of the PKK Regarding the Political Economy of the Kurdish Region in Turkey’ in Kurdish Studies3: 1: 26–46.
46.
YatesL.2015, ‘Rethinking Prefiguration: Alternatives, Micropolitics and Goals in Social Movements’ in Social Movement Studies14: 1: 1–21.
47.
ZeydanliogluW.2012, ‘Turkey's Kurdish Language Policy’ in ‘The Kurdish Linguistic Landscape: Vitality, Linguicide and Resistance’ special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language2012: 217: 99–125.
48.
ZeydanliogluW. & RingsG.2003, ‘Antagonistic Perspectives: Turkish and European Discourse on the Kurds’ in Rivista internazionale di storia della storiografia43: 30–61.
