Pressure on development actors to demonstrate results has forced the adoption of logical models that objectify contexts and people through cultural, time, and other value-laden frames that distance the service providers from those they purport to serve. This permits the compartmentalisation of the past, the present, and the future of target populations into dismembered experiences in which the emotions, knowledge, and desires of people bear no relationship to each other. Based on encounters in workshops, focus group discussions, and personal interviews, as part of post-conflict peace and development interventions in Liberia, this study asserts that the best efforts of donors and practitioners in peace and development can do no more than skirt around the challenges ordinary people face without finding lasting solutions, since their metrics aim to make the targets be like them, not better of themselves. Donors count what target populations do not count as peace or development.
AnghieA.2014, ‘International Human Rights Law and a Developing World Perspective’ in SheeranS., & RodleyN. eds, Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Abingdon: Routledge: 109–126.
2.
AsanteM.K.1987, The Afrocentric Idea, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
Azarbaijani-MoghaddamS., WardakM., ZamanI. & TaylorA.2008, ‘Afghan Hearts, Afghan Minds: Exploring Afghan Perceptions of Civil-Military Relations’, Research conducted for the European Network of NGOs in Afghanistan (ENNA) and the British and Irish Agencies Afghanistan Group (BAAG), European Network of NGOs in Afghanistan (ENNA) and the British and Irish Agencies Afghanistan Group (BAAG), London.
BeathA., ChristiaF. & EnikolopovR.2012, ‘Winning Hearts and Minds? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan’, Paper presented at the Princeton Global Conference, Princeton University: https://www.princeton.edu/~pcglobal/conferences/methods/papers/beath.pdf, accessed 15 November 2015
6.
BerthélemyJ.-C., ‘Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?’ in Review of Development Economics10:: 179–194.
BloomfieldD., BarnesT. & HuyseL. eds. 2003, Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
9.
BorwahA.2013, ‘Concept Paper for Peacebuilding & Reconciliation for Catholic Clergy in Post-War Liberia’, Report by the Catholic Bishops Conference of Liberia: on file with Author.
10.
BushG.W.2003, ‘The Millennium Challenge Account: A New Vision for Development’, Fact Sheet, Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Washington, DC.
Cabicol2013, ‘Project Proposal for Peacebuilding & Reconciliation for Catholic Clergy in Post-War Liberia’, Report by the Catholic Bishops Conference of Liberia: on file with Author.
ChristieR.2012, ‘The Pacification of Soldiering, and the Militarization of Development: Contradictions Inherent in Provincial Reconstruction in Afghanistan’ in Globalizations: Special Issue: Global South to the Rescue: Emerging Humanitarian Superpowers and Globalizing Rescue Industries9: 53–71.
FosterJ.W. & WellsP.2004, ‘We the Peoples: A Call to Action for the UN Millennium Declaration’, Report on Civil Society Engagement with the Millennium Development Goals 2004, The North-South Institute (NSI) and The World Federation of United Nations Associations (WFUNA).
20.
GleditschN.P.2007, ‘Environmental Change, Security, and Conflict’, in CrockerC.A.et al. eds, Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, Washington, DC: US Institute for Peace: 177–196.
21.
HopwoodJ.2011, ‘We Can't Be Sure Who Killed Us: Memory and Memorialization in Post-conflict Northern Uganda’, Report for the International Center for Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Project.
KingS.2008, ‘Are Liberians Ready for War Crimes Court for Their Country?’ in New Liberian, 9 February: http://newliberian.com/?p=229, accessed 19 February 2008.
LancasterC.2007, Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
28.
LopesP.S.2005, ‘The Disconcerting Pyramids of Poverty and Inequality of Sub-Saharan Africa’, Working Paper WP/05/47, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
29.
LukácsG.2010, ‘The Irrational Chasm between Subject and Object’ reprinted in LemertC. ed., Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, 4th edn, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
McCandlessE., ChigasD. & WoodrowP.2012, ‘Developing Indicators for Peacebuilding and Statebuilding Goals: Employing a Peacebuilding Lens’, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development7:3: 87–95.
32.
McCarthyT.2005, ‘Vergangenheitsbewältigung in the United States: On the Politics of the Memory of Slavery’ in PenskyM. ed. Globalizing Critical Theory, New York: Rowman & Littlefield: 138–164.
MuvingiI., ‘Sitting on Powder Kegs: Socioeconomic Rights in Transitional Societies’ International Journal of Transitional Justice3: 163–182.
37.
OjieloO.2010, ‘Critical Lessons in Post-Conflict Security in Africa: The case of Liberia's Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Occasional Paper 1, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
OttosenH.L.2010, ‘NEPAD's Contribution to Democracy and Good Governance in Africa’, Discussion Paper, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm.
40.
Oxfam, Actionaid, Care, Concern Worldwide, Christian Aid, Afghanaid & Trocaire2010, ‘Quick Impact, Quick Collapse: The Dangers of Militarized Aid in Afghanistan’, Oxfam UK paper.
PulH.2014a, Notes from Plenary Presentations of Group Works during Workshop on Reconciliation in Liberia, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Liberia, Unpublished: on File with Author.
43.
PulH.2014b, ‘Report on the Training in Peacebuilding & Reconciliation for Catholic Clergy in Post-war Liberia’, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Liberia & Africa Justice and Peace Working Group, Catholic Relief Services, Monrovia.
44.
RothermundD.2006, The Routledge Companion to Decolonization, London & New York: Routledge.
Scharbatke-Church, 2010, Designing Great Interventions: A Living Handbook, New York, NY: International Center for Transitional Justice.
49.
SchabasW.A., ‘A Synergistic Relationship: The Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court for Sierra Leone’ in Criminal Law Forum15: 3–54.
50.
SchraederP.J., HookS.W. & TaylorB., ‘Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows’ in’ World Politics50: 294–323.
51.
ShivaV.1988, Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and DevelopmentLondon: Zed Books.
SumnerA. & TribeM.A.2008, International Development Studies: Theories and Methods in Research and Practice, London: Sage Publications.
57.
SweetA. & OndiakN.2008, ‘The Cost of Reaction: The Long-Term Costs of Short-Term Cures’, Sustainable Security Series Report, Center for American Progress.
58.
TarnoffC.2015, ‘Millennium Challenge Corporation’, Congressional Research Service paper, Washington, DC.
The International Center for Transitional Justice & the Kofi Annan Foundation2014, ‘Challenging the Conventional: Can Truth Commissions Strengthen Peace Processes?’, Report by the International Center for Transitional Justice and the Kofi Annan Foundation.
TwoseG. & MahoneyC.O.2015, ‘The Trouble with Truth Telling: Preliminary Reflections on Truth and Justice in Post War Liberia’ in Peace and Conflict Studies22: Article 1.
67.
WaleK.2014, ‘Reflecting on Reconciliation: Lessons from the Past, Prospects for the Future’, SA Reconciliation Barometer Survey: 2014 Report, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
68.
WeahA., ‘Hopes and Uncertainties: Liberia's Journey to End Impunity’ International Journal of Transitional Justice6: 331–343.
WilsonJ.H.2014, ‘Local Peace Processes in Sudan and South Sudan’, Report for the United States Institute of Peace, Washington, DC.
71.
WoodK.2015, ‘Brief Recollection of the Historical and Contemporary Factors Underscoring the State of Liberia Today’, Proceedings from Gathering Voices Consultative Workshop towards Strategy Planning Process of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Liberia. Monrovia, Liberia: Unpublished.
