Based on research and evaluation experiences from Sri Lanka, Malawi, Sudan and Pakistan, this paper reflects on critical implications of ethics at local level. Providing various examples, the paper invites the reader to think through solutions to their own questions and challenges in the realm of evaluation ethics. Further, this paper examines the ethics of evaluation through the lens of the author's own experiences as a researcher and evaluator, which is shaped by his particular positionality and by what he has learnt working in the space within and between the European university system and violently divided communities. From this standpoint, this paper has managed to distinguish some of the central challenges to evaluators working in violently divided communities.
OrbA.EisenhauerL.WynadenD. (2000). Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship33, 193–96.
19.
PhillipsB. D. & MorrowB. H.2005, ‘Social Science Research Needs: A Focus on Vulnerable Populations, Forecasting and Warnings’, Paper presented at the Hurricane Forecast Socio-economic Workshop, Pomona, CA.
20.
RaudonisB. M. (1992). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research with Hospice Patients. Qualitative Health Research2, 2238–249.
21.
Reynoso-VallejoH.2012, ‘HumbertoReynoso-Vallejo on Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in Evaluation’, AEA360: http://aea365.org/blog, accessed 2 May 2012
22.
SaidE. W. (2003). OrientalismLondon: Penguin Books.
23.
SenA. (1999). Development as FreedomNew York: Random House.
WignarajaP.2005, ‘Fundamentals of Poverty Eradication in South Asia’, Conference on Good Governance, Poverty Reduction and Community Resilience, Green Movement of Sri Lanka, and Disaster and Development Centre, UK, Negambo, Sri Lanka, 22–24 August.
