A national peace committee is a multi-stakeholder body mandated to implement key peacebuilding objectives, and coordinate a multi-level network of peace committees called an infrastructure for peace. Based on 10 case studies, the article explores the importance of political legitimacy for the success of NPCs and analyses, in particular, the contribution of their mandate, role clarity, composition and competence.
BombandeEmmanuel (2007). Ghana: Developing an Institutional Framework for Sustainable Peace – UN, Government and Civil Society Collaboration for Conflict Prevention. Joint Action for Prevention: Civil Society and Government Cooperation on Conflict Prevention and PeacebuildingPaul vanTongerenChristine vanEmpelDen Haag: European Centre for Conflict Prevention.
2.
BombandeEmmanuel. 2010, ‘An Infrastructure for Peace in Ghana’, Unpublished paper presented to UNDP/DPA/GPPAC conference on building infrastructures for peace.Naivasha, Kenya.
3.
Boutros-GhaliBoutros (1992). An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keepingNew York: United Nations.
4.
ChalmersRhoderick (2010). Nepal: From Conflict to Consolidating a Fragile Peace. Civil Society and Peacebuilding: A Critical AssessmentThaniaPaffenholzBoulder: Lynne Rienner.
5.
GaltungJ (1975). Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking and Peacebuilding. Peace, War and Defence: Essays in Peace ResearchGaltungJ.Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.
6.
INCAF (International Network on Conflict and Fragility)The State's Legitimacy in Fragile Situations: Unpacking ComplexityParis: OECD2010.
7.
JumaMonica Kathina (2009). African Mediation of the Kenyan post-2007 Election Crisis. Journal of Contemporary African Studies27, 3Special Issue: Infrastructures for Peace407–430.
8.
Kan-DapaahAlbert. 2006, ‘A National Architecture for Peace in Ghana’, Concept paper for the Ministry of the Interior, Accra.
9.
KumarChetan (2011). Building National “Infrastructures for Peace”: UN Assistance for Internally Negotiated Solutions to Violent Conflict. Peacemaking: From Practice to TheorySusanAllen NanZachariahCherian MampillyAndreaBartoliSanta Barbara CA: Praeger.
10.
LederachJohn Paul (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided SocietiesWashington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
11.
MitchellChristopherHancockLandon (2012). Local Peacebuilding and National Peace: Interaction between Grassroots and Elite ProcessesLondon: Continuum.
12.
NathanLaurie (1999). “When Push Comes to Shove”’: The Failure of International Mediation in Africa Civil Wars. Track Two8, 21–27.
13.
OdendaalAndries. 2010, ‘An Architecture for Building Peace at the Local Level: A Comparative Study of Local Peace Committees’, Discussion paper for UN Development Programme, New York.
14.
OdendaalAndries (2012). South Africa's Infrastructure for Peace. Local Peacebuilding and Elite ProcessesMitchellChristopher R.HancockLandon E.London: Continuum.
15.
OdendaalAndries (Forthcoming). Rebuilding Intra-community Ruins. A Study of Local Peace CommitteesWashington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
16.
OjieloOzonnia. 2007, ‘Designing an Architecture for Peace: A Framework of Conflict Transformation in Ghana’, Paper presented at the First Biennial Conference and General Assembly of the Society for Peace Studies and Practice, January 22, Abuja.
17.
RaknerLise & SvasandLars. 2005, ‘Maybe Free but not Fair: Electoral Administration in Malawi, 1994-2004’, CMI Working Papers 5. Chr. Michelson Institute, Bergen.
Van TongerenPaul (2011a). Increasing Interest in Infrastructures for Peace. Journal of Conflictology2, 216–26.
20.
Van TongerenPaul (2011b). Infrastructures for Peace. Peacemaking: From Practice to TheorySusanAllen NanZachariahCherian MampillyAndreaBartoliSanta Barbara CA: Praeger.
21.
World BankWorld Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and DevelopmentWashington, DC: World Bank2011.
