This article examines the role of NGOs and broader civil society in laying the ground for sustainable peace and development by maintaining and promoting early security and stability through the monitoring of ceasefire agreements. Central activities include preventing protagonists from engaging in violence, monitoring the peace process, documenting violations and promoting dialogue. The article draws lessons from an analysis of the ‘Bantay Ceasefire’ (Ceasefire Watch), a closely networked grassroots movement of NGO and other civil society actors which was formed to establish community security through monitoring a ceasefire agreement between the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in Mindanao, the second largest island of the Philippines. The article adds to the growing literature on the strategic role of NGOs and wider civil society in enabling citizen security as the missing link at the nexus of peace, security and development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbubakarA. (2006). Challenges of Peacebuilding in the GRP-MILF Peace ProcessManila: AIM January.
2.
AgruillasC. (2003). Media and Peacebuilding in Mindanao. Learning from Public Participation in Peace ProcessesConciliation Resources and Catholic Relief Services18 September workshop on.
3.
Bantay Ceasefire ReportReports of the Grassroots-led Missions Monitoring the Ceasefire between the Philippine Government and the Moro Islamic Liberation FrontDavao City: Initiatives for International Dialogue2003.
4.
(2002). Owning the Process: Public Participation in Peacemaking. Accord: An International Review of Peace InitiativesBarnesC.South Africa13.
5.
Cagoco-GuiamR. (1999). A Critical Partnership: Civil Society and the Peace Process. Accord: An International Review of Peace InitiativesSouth Africa6.
6.
CCCH (Coordinating Committees on the Cessation of Hostilities)LMTs (Local Monitoring Teams)Manual of Instructions for CCCH and LMT: Guidelines on Implementing the Security Aspect of the Tripoli AgreementTripoli2002.
7.
Human Insecurity in a Globalising WorldChenL.Fukuda-ParrS.SeidenstickerE.Boston: Harvard University Press2004.
8.
CollettaN.CullenM. (2000). Resilient Communities: Building the Social Foundations of Human Security. New Paths to Social Development — Community and Global Networks in ActionWashington DC: World Bank.
9.
CollettaN.ScottC.Mendelson-FormanJ. (1999). Security, Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development: Challenges for the New MillenniumWashington DC: World Bank.
10.
DiamondL.McDonaldJ. (1996). Multi-track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to PeaceWest Hartford: Kumarian Press.
11.
FerrerM. (2002). Philippines National Unification Commission: National Consultation and the “Six Paths to Peace”. Owning the Process: Public Participation in Peacemaking’ PeacemakingBarnesC.South Africa13in Accord: An International Review of Peace Initiatives.
12.
Mapagpakamalinawon: A Reader for the Mindanawon Peace AdvocateGasparKLapadE.MaravillasA.Davao City: Alternative Forum for Research in Mindanao & Catholic Relief Services2002.
13.
GutierrezE.BorrasS. (2004). The Moro Conflict: Landlessness and Misdirected State PoliciesWashington: East-West Centre8Policy Study.
14.
HansonN. (2003). Peacemaking and Broader Civil Society in Intra-state Conflict in the Post-Cold War EraSweden: Uppsala University unpublished masters thesis.
15.
Commission on Human SecurityHuman Security Now: Protecting and Empowering PeopleWashington, DC: Communications Development Inc2003.
16.
HuberK. (2004). HDC in Aceh: Promises and Pitfalls of Third Party MediationWashington DC: East-West Centre.
17.
HulmeD.GoodhandJ. (2000). NGOs and Peacebuilding in Complex Political EmergenciesInstitute of Political Policy and Management, University of Manchester12 March Working Paper.
18.
IFFC (Independent Fact-finding Committee)General Information Brochure on the IFFCCotabato: Notre Dame University1997.
19.
International Crisis GroupSouthern Philippines Backgrounder: Terrorism and the Peace TalksSingapore & Brussels13 July2004Report 80.
20.
KortenD. (1990). Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global AgendaWest Hartford: Kumarian Press.
21.
LaysonR. (2003). War, The Real Enemy Is War ItselfDavao City: Initiatives for International Dialogue.
22.
Mindanao Peace WeaversReport of Working Group MeetingDavao City12 April2004.
23.
Mindanao Trust Fund-Joint Needs Assessment. (2005). Draft, World Bank, Manila.
24.
RoilB. (1994). The Minoritisation of the Indigenous Communities of Mindanao and the Sulu ArchipelagoDavao City: AFRIM.
25.
RoodS.2003, ‘Civil Society and Conflict Management’, draft paper prepared for East-West Centre Study Group meeting on the Dynamics and Management of Internal Conflict in Asia, March, Washington DC.
26.
RupesingheK.2005, ‘A New Generation of Conflict Prevention: Early Warning, Early Action and Human Security’, paper presented at the Global Conference on the Role of Civil Society in Preventing Armed Conflict and Peacebuilding, 19–21 July, New York.
27.
SalahJ. (1999). Bangsamoro: A Nation under Endless TyrannyKuala Lumpur: IQ Marin SDN BD.
28.
Tabang Mindanaw (2002). Sanctuaries of Peace Update: Integrated Return and Rehabilitation Programme. Panday-Buhat Alang Sa kalinaw — Muslim-Christian Revives Local Peace Pact February Field Report 11.
29.
TschirgiN. (2003). Peacebuilding as the Link between Security and Development: Is the Window of Opportunity Closing?. International Peace Academy Studies in Security and DevelopmentNew York December.
30.
Von TurgerenP. (2003). Civil Society in Violence and Conflict PreventionGlobal Initiative of the United Nations.
31.
World BankSocial Assessment of Conflict-affected Areas of Mindanao, Philippines Postconflict Series 1 Washington DC: Environment and Social Development Unit, East Asia and Pacific Region3 March2003.
32.
ZartmanI.RasmussenJ. (1997). Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and TechniquesWashington: United States Institute of Peace.
