AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
2.
BauerM. W., & BeckerS. (2020). Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026
3.
BertelliA. M. (2021). Democracy administered: How public administration shapes representative government. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BertelliA. M., & LynnL. E. (2006). Madison’s managers: Public administration and the constitution. Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
DahlR. A. (2000). On democracy. Yale University Press.
6.
FredericksonG. (2005). The state of social equity in American public administration. National Civic Review, 94(4), 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.117
7.
GoodenS., & PortilloS. (2011). Advancing social equity in the Minnowbrook tradition. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 21(suppl_1), i61–i76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067
8.
HerringR. K. (1976). A comparative study of graduate education in public administration, business administration, and Law. [Unpublished MPA thesis]. City University of New York.
9.
HolzerM., & LinW. (2007). A longitudinal perspective on mpa education in the United States. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001484
10.
IngrahamP. W., & ZuckA. (1996). Public affairs and administration education: An overview and look ahead from the NASPAA perspective. Journal of Public Administration Education, 2(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10877789.1996.12023397
11.
KaltwasserC. R.TaggartP. A.EspejoP. O., & OstiguyP. (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
12.
KapucuN., & KolibaC. (2017). Using competency-based portfolios as a pedagogical tool and assessment strategy in MPA programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(4), 993–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002301
13.
KolibaC. (2024). Liberal democratic accountability standards and public administration. Public Administration Review, 1–11(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13831
14.
KolibaC.MeekJ.ZiaA., & MillsR. (2018). Governance networks in public administration and public policy (2nd ed.). Routledge Press.
15.
KruyenP. M., & SowaJ. E. (2023). Essential but ignored: Including blue-collar government workers into human resource management research. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231187540
16.
NewboldS. (2011). No time like the present: Making rule of law and constitutional competence the theoretical and practical foundation for public administration graduate education curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2011.12001657
17.
RaffelJ. A. (2010). What we have learned from the NASPAA standards review process. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2010.12001580
18.
SajóA.UitzR., & HolmesS. (Eds.). (2021). Routledge handbook of illiberalism. Routledge.
19.
StewartD. W. (1985). Professionalism vs. democracy: Friedrich vs. Finer revisited. Public Administration Quarterly, 9(1), 13–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41575704
20.
SvaraJ. H., & BaizhanovS. (2019). Public service values in NASPAA programs: Identification, integration, and activation. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1454761
VentrissC. (2021). Public affairs and democratic ideals: Critical perspectives in an era of political and economic uncertainty. State University of New York Press.