Mentoring is important for students in a Master of Public Administration (MPA) program. This can be even more complicated when the academic program is fully online. Effective mentoring is about building relationships and guiding academically, professionally and emotionally. This can be challenging in the online environment due to a lack of social cues and technology barriers, but is possible through e-mentoring. This contribution is focused on both the quality of mentorship for MPA students and the complexities of providing mentoring in a fully online environment. Additionally, this involves the centering of mentoring in program delivery and how this is integrated into program goals including the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA) competencies. A survey was sent to current and former MPA students in a fully online MPA program to assess student perceptions of the ideal mentor and their achievement of the NASPAA competencies. It was found that there is considerable overlap between some mentorship qualities and perceptions of NASPAA competencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE. M., & ShannonA. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718803900109
2.
Bell-EllisonB., & DedrickR. (2008). What do doctoral students value in their ideal mentor?Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9085-8
3.
de JanaszS. C.EnsherE. A., & HeunC. (2008). Virtual relationships and real benefits: Using e-mentoring to connect business students with practicing managers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(4), 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802433775
4.
Gafni-LachterL.NiemeyerL.DoyleN.NorcrossJ., & JacobsK. (2021). Equal peer e-mentoring for online graduate students: A case study and mediation model. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1986799
5.
HallW. A., & LivaS. (2021). Mentoring as a transformative experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1899583
6.
HatcherW.MearesW. L., & GordonV. (2017). The capacity and constraints of small MPA programs: A survey of program directors. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(3), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002292
7.
HolzerM. (1999). Mentoring as a commitment to teaching. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.1999.12022047
8.
JohnsonW. B. (2008). Are advocacy, mutuality, and evaluation incompatible mentoring functions?Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701800942
9.
KasprisinC. A.Boyle SingleP.SingleR. M., & MullerC. B. (2003). Building a better bridge: Testing e-training to improve e-mentoring programmes in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000054817
10.
KramK. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
11.
KumarS., & JohnsonM. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
12.
LevinsonD. J.DarrowC. N.KleinE. B.LevinsonM. H., & McKeeB. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life: The groundbreaking 10-year study that was the basis for passages!Ballantine Books.
13.
LorenzettiD. L.ShiptonL.NowellL.JacobsenM.LorenzettiL.ClancyT., & PaolucciE. O. (2019). A systematic review of graduate student peer mentorship in academia. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 27(5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2019.1686694
14.
LunsfordL. G.CrispG.DolanE. L., & WuetherickB. (2017). Mentoring in higher education. In D. A. Clutterbuck, F. K. Kochan, L. G. Lunsford, N. Dominguez, & J. Haddock-Millar (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of entoring (Vol. 20, pp. 316–334). Sage.
15.
MeierK. J. (2022). It all depends: Reflections on the art of mentoring PhD students in public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4311599
16.
MeineM. F., & DunnT. P. (2017). MPA programs and internet education: Validation of quality and acceptance despite challenges surrounding online delivery. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(2), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002277
17.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2017). Number and percentage of students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by distance education participation, location of student, level of enrollment, and control and level of institution: Fall 2014 and fall 2015. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_311.15.asp
18.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2018). Number and percentage of graduate students enrolled in distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics: Selected years, 2003-04 through 2015-16. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_311.32.asp
19.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2022). Number and percentage of students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by distance education participation, location of student, level of enrollment, and control and level of institution: Fall 2020 and fall 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_311.15.asp
20.
Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration. (n.d.). Find your graduate degree for public service. https://www.naspaa.org/schools-search
21.
NiA. Y.Van WartM.MedinaP.CollinsK.SilversE., & PeiH. (2020). A profile of MPA students’ perceptions of online learning: What MPA students value in online education and what they think would improve online learning experiences. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1820288
22.
PattonL. D., & HarperS. R. (2003). Mentoring relationships among African American women in graduate and professional schools. New Directions for Student Services, 2003(104), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.108
23.
PoelE. W.Arroyos-JuradoE., & CoppolaB. J. (2006). Women, mentoring, and a border university. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2006.12001453
24.
PortilloS. (2007). Mentoring minority and female students: Recommendations for improving mentoring in public administration and public affairs programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001470
25.
ProutyA.HelmekeK., & FischerJ. (2016). Development of the ‘mentorship in clinical training scale’ (MiCTS). Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 38(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9351-9
26.
RickardK. (2004). E-mentoring and pedagogy: A useful nexus for evaluating online mentoring programs for small business?Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(3), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/030910042000275972
27.
RoperC. D., & HirthM. A. (2005). A history of change in the third mission of higher education: The evolution of one-way service to interactive engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 10(3), 3–21.
28.
RoseG. L. (1999). What do doctoral students want in a mentor?: Development of the ideal mentor sale. University of Iowa.
29.
RoseG. L. (2003). Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024289000849
30.
RoseG. L. (2005). Group differences in graduate students? Concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6289-4
31.
SchlosserL. Z., & FoleyP. F. (2008). Ethical issues in multicultural student-faculty mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701801015
32.
SchunkD., & MullenC. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: Integration with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9233-3
33.
SchwartzH. L., & HollowayE. L. (2014). “I become a part of the learning process”: Mentoring episodes and individualized attention in graduate education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.882604
34.
SinclairC. (2003). Mentoring online about mentoring: Possibilities and practice. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 11(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000054826
35.
SingleP. B., & SingleR. M. (2005). E‐mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500107481
36.
StrausS. E.GrahamI. D.TaylorM., & LockyerJ. (2008). Development of a mentorship strategy: A knowledge translation case study. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.179
37.
Van WartM.NiA.HamiltonH., & DrudyS. (2022). Considering the roles of professional accrediting bodies in online programme quality: The case of the NASPAA. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1977481
