AlexanderJ., & StiversC. (2020). Racial bias: A buried cornerstone of the administrative state. Administration & Society, 52(10), 1470–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720921508
2.
ArendtH. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken Books.
3.
ArendtH. (1954). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. Penguin.
4.
ArendtH. (1982). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (R. Beiner, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
5.
BevirM. (2011). Why historical distance is not a problem. History & Theory, 50(4), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00601.x
6.
Diaz de KrofcheckM. D., & JacksonC. (1974). The Chicano experience with nativism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 34(6), 534–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/974348
7.
DryzekJ. C., & LeonardS. T. (1988). History and discipline in political science. The American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961758
8.
DurantR. (2014). Taking time seriously: Progressivism, the business-social science nexus, and the paradox of American administrative reform. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001546
9.
FixicoD. L. (1986). Termination and relocation: Federal Indian policy, 1945–1960. University of New Mexico Press.
10.
FredericksonH. G. (2010). Social equity and public administration: Origins, developments, and applications. M.E. Sharpe.
11.
GausJ. (1930). A survey of research in public administration. Social Science Research Council.
12.
GausJ. (1947). Reflections on public administration. University of Alabama Press.
13.
GoodenS. T., & BlessettB. (2020). Cultural competency and social equity in public affairs programs. In McDonaldB. D. & HatcherW. (Eds.), The public affair faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs (pp. 223–238). Routledge.
KearneyR. (1997). The crisis of narrative in contemporary culture. Metaphilosophy, 28(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00049
16.
KuhnT. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
17.
MarchJ. G. (2011). Video clip in The Multimedia Encyclopedia of Organization Theory. From Taylor to today (2011)., ed. and scientific advisor Edward Friedberg. R&O Multimedia. www.recherche-et-organisation.com/en
18.
McCandlessS.BishuS. G.HernandezM. G.ErasoE. P.SabharwalM.SantisE. L., & YatesS. (2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12830
19.
McDonaldB. D.HallJ. L.O’FlynnJ., & van ThielS. (2022). The future of public administration research: An editor’s perspective. Public Administration, 100(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12829
20.
PatlerN. (2004). Jim Crow and the Wilson administration: Protesting federal segregation in the early twentieth century. University Press of Colorado.
21.
RicoeurP. (2007). The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (D. Ihde, Ed.). Northwestern University Press.
22.
RockwellS. J. (2010). Indian affairs and the administration state in the nineteeth century. Cambridge University Press.
23.
StiversC. (2017). Elouise Cobell and the Indian Trust Funds: Accountability and trust in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2017.1293406
24.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277