Enrollment pressures and other considerations spur Master of Public Administration online offerings, and specific skillsets are needed for implementation. Online program management providers (OPMs) are for-profit companies that bundle services to establish academic programs in exchange for tuition revenue sharing agreements, upfront fees, or a combination of the two. In such relationships, principal-agent problems may arise in which a company’s profit motives conflict with a university’s larger set of goals and, as a result, stakeholders should recognize the dynamic. However, the lack of industry transparency and emerging business models impede easy understanding. Analysis of contracts obtained through open records requests and other documents (a) identifies available services and (b) reveals potential problems as well as mitigation tactics. Findings contribute to our understanding of what OPM agreements entail, including the contributions made by faculty and other university personnel.
ArgyrisC., & SchönD. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
5.
AtkinsonC. L. (2021). Significant learning and public administration education: The impact of short-term courses. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420977902
BrainardL. A., & InfeldD. L. (2017). The challenges and rewards of service: Job satisfaction among public affairs program directors. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(3), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002289
8.
BrownT. L., & PotoskiM. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug030
9.
BryanT. K.LutteR.LeeJ.O’NeilP.MaherC. S., & HoflundA. B. (2018). When do online education technologies enhance student engagement? A case of distance education at University of Nebraska at Omaha. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1429817
10.
BryerT. A., & EikenberryA. M. (2012). Social and technological innovations in teaching public affairs: Introduction to the symposium. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2012.12001692
CoggburnJ. D., & LlorensJ. J. (2020). Strategic planning for your program. In McDonaldB. D. & HatcherW. (Eds.), The public affairs faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs (pp. 77–97). Routledge.
13.
ConwayD. M. (2012). State and local government procurement. American Bar Association.
14.
CorbinJ. M., & StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
15.
DarbyF., & LangJ. M. (2019). Small teaching online: Applying learning science in online classes. John Wiley & Sons.
16.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
GoodmanD. (2020). Curriculum and instructional design. In McDonaldB. D. & HatcherW. (Eds.), The public affairs faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs (pp. 139–161). Routledge.
19.
GreveC. (2007). Contracting for public services. Routledge.
HatcherW., & McDonaldB. D. (2020). Managing your public affairs program. In McDonaldB. D. & HatcherW. (Eds.), The public affairs faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
22.
HefetzA., & WarnerM. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh012
JohnstonJ. M., & RomzekB. S. (2010). The promises, performance, and pitfalls of government contracting. In DurantR. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 396–420). Oxford University Press.
25.
KearnsL. R. (2016). The experience of teaching online and its impact on faculty innovation across delivery methods. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.005
26.
KelmanS. (2002). Contracting. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 282–318). Oxford University Press.
McDonaldB. D., & HatcherW. (Eds.) (2020). The public affairs faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs. Routledge.
34.
McDonaldB. D. (2021). Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education. Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154
35.
MilwardH. B., & ProvanK. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
National Association of State Procurement Officials. (2019). State and local government procurement: A practical guide (3rd ed.). J. Ross Publishing.
38.
Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration. (2020). Kent State University, data collection: Academic year 2019-2020. Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration, https://www.naspaa.org/schools-detail?id=1877.
NiA. Y.Van WartM.MedinaP.CollinsK.SilversE., & PeiH. (2021). A profile of MPA students’ perceptions of online learning: What MPA students value in online education and what they think would improve online learning experiences. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1820288
The University of North Carolina (UNC)-2tor (2U). (2012). Master services agreement. January 30
51.
The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA)-Academic Partnerships, LLC. (2017). First amendment and restatement of online education services agreement order. November 9.
52.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2022). Education needs to strengthen its approach to monitoring colleges’ arrangements with online program managers. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-104463.pdf
WilliamsonO. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
