Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes the pedagogical efforts of 67 NASPAA programs offering a specialization in global/comparative administration and policy. A web content analysis of course and concentration titles, course descriptions and syllabi of 67 programs with this specialization showed that across all programs, 52 unique concentrations were offered, and graduate students had access to 279 courses as core and elective offerings. This paper explores the specific pedagogical efforts undertaken to introduce comparative administration and policy concepts to graduate students. Implications of this study for graduate education in public affairs are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appe

Rubaii

, & Kerry

(2016). Advancing global cultural competencies: International service learning within NASPAA member programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002229

Baracskay

(2021). Teaching diversity, cultural competency, and globalization to American public affairs students: Integrating comparative approaches to public administration and policy. Teaching Public Administration, 39(3), 287–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420921918

Bell

D. A.

(2021). From domestic public service to global agendas: Employing comparative public administration courses to bridging between life, lessons, and learning. Section on International and Comparative Administration (SICA) of the American Society of Public Administration (ASPA), 3(1), 24–30. http://www.sica-aspa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/OPS-3.1.24-30-Bell-Viewpoint-From-Domestic-Public-Service-to-Global-Agendas.pdf.

Bertelli

A. M.

Hassan

Honig

Rogger

, & Williams

M. J.

(2020). An agenda for the study of public administration in developing countries. Governance, 33(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12520

Braga

(2020). Is public administration struggling in higher education? Evidence from the United States scenario. Teaching Public Administration, 38(3), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420908306

Candler

G. G.

Azevêdo

, & Albernaz

R. O.

(2010). Towards global scholarship in public affairs. Public Administration, 88(3), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x

Capobianco

Chen

Líppez De Castro

, & Rubaii

(2018). Enhancing global and intercultural competencies in master of public administration classes: Assessing alternative approaches to incorporating cultures and languages. Teaching Public Administration, 36(2), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417753031

Cendrowicz

(2018). On the need for comparative study of public administration and administrative law. In D. Cendrowicz & A. Chrisidu-Budnik (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives for Public Administration and Administrative law (pp. 35–43). Retrieved from http://www.bibliotekacyfrowa.pl/publication/95859

Cheng

(2019). Are we globalized? Transformative education and internationalization within NASPAA programs [Dissertations]. Western Michigan University, 3422. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3422

10.

Farrell

Hatcher

, & Diamond

(2021). Reflecting on over 100 years of public administration education. Public Administration.

11.

Fitzpatrick

Goggin

Heikkila

Klingner

Machado

, & Martell

(2011). A new look at comparative public administration: Trends in research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02432.x

12.

Flammia

Sadri

, & Mejia

(2019). An internalization project to develop global competency across the disciplines. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 332–345. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224379.pdf

13.

Gulrajani

& Moloney

(2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x

14.

Haque

M. S.

Wal

, & Berg

(2021). Comparative studies in public administration: Intellectual challenges and alternative perspectives. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13349

15.

Haupt

Kapucu

, & Hu

(2017). Core competencies in master of public administration programs: Perspectives from local government managers. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(1), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2017.12002272

16.

Heady

(2006). Comparison in the Study of Public Administration. In Otenyo

E. E.

and Lind

N. S.

(Eds.), Comparative Public Administration (Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management (Vol. 155, pp. 61–127). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-1317(06)15003-4

17.

Jreisat

J. E.

(2005). Comparative public administration is back in, prudently. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00447.x

18.

Jreisat

J. E.

(2011). Commentary - Comparative public administration: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 834–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02434.x

19.

Jreisat

J. E.

(2019). Comparative public administration and policy. Routledge.

20.

Kille

K. J.

& Lyon

A. J.

(2020). The United Nations: 75 years of promoting peace, human rights, and development. ABC-CLIO, LLC.

21.

Kombate

& Dong

(2018). Dictatorship, bad governance and their impact on public need and social development: A comparative public administration (CPA) study on the evidence of Toto. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(9), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2018.1123

22.

Lantz Deaton

& Golubeva

(2020). What is intercultural competence and why do we need it? In Intercultural competence for college and university students (pp. 1–23). Springer.

23.

Lopes-Murphy

S. A.

(2013). Evaluating the impact of two globalization projects on college students’ cultural competence and cultural intelligence (CQ). Journal of Effective Teaching, 13(1), 5–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092148.pdf

24.

Lopez-Littleton

& Blessett

(2015). A framework for integrating cultural competency into the curriculum of public administration programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2015.12002220

25.

Manoharan

A. P.

Mirbel

, & Carrizales

T. J.

(2018). Global comparative public administration: Are graduate programs responding to the call? Teaching Public Administration, 36(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417708835

26.

Manoharan

A. P.

& Carrizales

(2021). Global comparative public administration and the practice of cultural competence. Section on International and Comparative Administration (SICA) of the American Society of Public Administration (ASPA), 2(1), 5–30. http://www.sica-aspa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OPS-Special-Issue-Vol-2-Issue-1-January-2021.pdf#page=5.

27.

McDonald

B. D.

(2021). Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education. Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154

28.

Nadia

& Calarusse

(2014). Preparing public service professionals for a diverse and changing workforce and citizenry: Evaluating the progress of NASPAA programs in competency assessment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2014.12001789

29.

Network of Schools of Public Policy, Administration, and Affairs . (2019). NASPAA standards: Commission on Peer review and accreditation . NASPAA. https://www.naspaa.org/sites/default/files/docs/2019-10/NASPAA%20Accreditation%20Standards%20-%202019%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20no%20rationale.pdf

30.

Otenyo

E. E.

& Lind

N. S.

(2006). Comparative public administration: The essential readings. Elsevier JAI.

31.

Perry

J. L.

(2016a). Building global public administration knowledge. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12588

32.

Perry

J. L.

(2016b). Is public administration vanishing? Public Administration Review, 76(2), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12534

33.

Pollitt

(2010). Riggs on comparative public administration: Looking back half a century. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(4), 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310386440

34.

Pollitt

(2011). Not odious but onerous: Comparative public administration. Public Administration, 89(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01904.x

35.

Raadschelders

J. C. N.

Vigoda-Gadot

, & Kisner

(2015). Global dimensions of public administration and governance: A comparative voyage. Jossey-Bass.

36.

Rice

M. F.

(2007). Promoting cultural competency in public administration and public service delivery: Utilizing self-assessment tools and performance measures. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001466

37.

Riggs

F. W.

(1998). Public administration in America: Why our uniqueness is exceptional and important. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/976886

38.

Straussman

J. D.

& Guinn

D. E.

(2022). Teaching international comparative public management through a development lens. Teaching Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394211042853

39.

Van de Walle

& Brans

(2018, January). Where comparative public administration and comparative policy studies meet. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1411006

40.

Wollmann

(2021). Comparative public administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1456

Pedagogical approaches to comparative public administration and policy: A study of NASPAA programs with a specialization in global/comparative administration

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References