Public administration faculty commonly use discussion forums in their asynchronous courses to engage students about course content. However, the typical pedagogical approach for online discussions forums is for the professor to post questions and students respond, in writing. In this paper, we suggest public administration classes should consider the use of FlipGrid for asynchronous course discussions because it engenders student participation through oral videos about course content. Our pilot study uses original data collected during a global pandemic (Spring 2021) to document the experiences of 39 students enrolled in two asynchronous public administration classes. The findings illustrate FlipGrid enhanced important skills for our public administration students – verbal communication skills (e.g. clarity and brevity) and ability to connect theory to practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AganT.AndersonD.AtwoodA.CasarezL.HeronA., & SelfR. (2019). FlipGrid to enhance communication in distance education. Collegial Exchange, 85(4), 35–37.
2.
AguileraE. & MehtaR. (2020). A critical approach to humanizing pedagogies in online teaching and learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0099
ArchambaultL.BorupJ.LowenthalP., & WestR. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COIVD-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1257171
5.
AustinE. K. (2009). Limits to technology-based distance education in MPA curricula. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2009.12001551
6.
BartlettM. (2018). Using FlipGrid to increase students’ connectedness in an online classroom. eLearn, 2018(12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3302261.3236703
7.
BryanT. K.LutteR.LeeJ.O’NeilP.MaherC. S., & HoflundA. B. (2018). When do online education technologies enhance student engagement? A case of distance education at University of Nebraska at Omaha. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1429817
8.
CarlsonC.KeiperM.LupinekJ., & WhiteA. (2020). Student perceptions on the benefits of FlipGrid in a HyFlex learning environment. Journal of Education for Business, 96(6), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1832431
9.
ChakrabortyM., & NafukhoF. M. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses?European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2013-0123
10.
CollinsD.HodgkinsonA., & StoszkowskiJ. (2020). Using FlipGrid to improve reflection: A collaborative online approach to coach development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1789575
11.
DaniD. E. & KoenigK. M. (2008). Technology and reform-based science education. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153825
12.
EmersonK., & GerlakA. K. (2016). Teaching collaborative governance online: Aligning collaborative instruction with online learning platforms. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002251
13.
FeldbushT.MandernachJ., & ValentiE. (2019). Comparison of faculty and student perceptions of videos in the online classroom. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(3), 1–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1224007
14.
FlanaganB. (2019). Creating community, enhancing engagement, and fostering verbal expression through a video discussion platform. International Universal Design for Learning Implementation & Research Network Summit, USA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24667.62247
15.
FrantzenD. (2014). Is technology a one-size-fits-all solution to improving student performance? A comparison of online, hybrid and face-to-face courses. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2014.12001808
16.
Gerbensky-KerberA. (2017). Creating a structured practice space with online mini-speeches. Communication Teacher, 31(2), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1285409
17.
GinnM. & HammondA. (2012). Online education in public affairs: Current state and emerging issues. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2012.12001683
18.
GreenT. & GreenJ. (2018). FlipGrid: Adding voice and video to online discussions. TechTrends, 62, 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0241-x
KleinschmitJ. & RemboldE. (2020). “I feel like I know you”: Using FlipGrid in online social work education. Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education, 21(2), 123–127.
23.
KoivulaM. (2015). The impacts of asynchronous video reflection on perceived learner social presence [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/194585
24.
LowenthalP. & MooreR. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of FlipGrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335
25.
McDonaldB. (2021). Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education. Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154
MooreM. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In KeeganD. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
28.
MurphyJ. & SerembusJ. (2019). Creating an engaging learning environment through video discussions. Nurse Educator, 45(2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000701
29.
OnakaN.PetersonJ., & TownsendS. (2020). Utilizing FlipGrid applications on student smartphones in a small-scale ESL study. English Language Teaching, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n5p164
30.
PerreaultH.WaldmanL.AlexanderM., & ZhaoJ. (2002). Overcoming barriers to successful delivery of distance-learning courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599681
31.
RinfretS. R. & PautzM. C. (2018). Gender, class format, and student attitudes towards political participation. In LevintovaE. and StaudingerA. (Eds.), Political science classroom. Indiana University Press.
32.
Romero-IvanovaC.ShaughnessyM.OttoL.TaylorE., & WatsonE. (2020). Digital practices & applications in a COVID-19 culture. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p80
SchulteA. (2004). The development of an asynchronous computer-mediated course: Observations on how to promote interactivity. College Teaching, 52(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.1.6-10
ValentineC. G. (2001). Electronic sex talk: The uses and dynamics of computer-mediated discussion groups in a team-taught human sexuality class. Teaching Sociology, 29(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318782
37.
YaghiA. (2022). Impact of online education on anxiety and stress among undergraduate public affairs students: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 28(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2021.1954469
