Emotional labor refers to the management and regulation of emotions as part of one’s professional role. This research is one of the first to provide insight into the role of emotional labor during a global pandemic for Master of Public Administration (MPA) Program directors. Our paper both replicates and extends previous work in emotional labor through examining survey data from 92 MPA Directors. Using emotional labor as our descriptive framework, the findings suggest gender and academic rank indicate whose workload has been affected during the coronavirus pandemic. Furthermore, the results indicate the likelihood of greater burdens experienced by women, both white women and women of color. Our findings offer additional understanding about how emotional labor continues to impact certain populations within our public administration and policy discipline, sounding the alarm for MPA programs to address the problems at hand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdul-MutakabbirJ. C.CaseyS.JewsV.KingA.SimmonsK.BelliarJ. C.PeveriniP., & VeltmanJ. (2021). A three-tiered approach to address barriers to COVID-19 vaccine delivery in the Black community. The Lancet, 9(6), E749–E750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00099-1
2.
AberyE., & GunsonJ. S. (2016). The cycle of student and staff wellbeing: Emotional labor and extension requests in higher education. A practice report. Student Success, 7(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v7i1.326
3.
AnthymM., & TuittF. (2019). When the levees break: The cost of vicarious trauma, microaggressions and emotional labor for Black administrators and faculty engaging in race work at traditionally White institutions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(9), 1072–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1645907
4.
AwasthiP., & MastracciS. H. (2021). Integrating emotive competencies in public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 27(4), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2021.1947072
5.
BakerP., & CoppM. (1997). Gender performance matters most: The interaction of gendered expectations, feminist course content and pregnancy in students’ course evaluations. Teaching Sociology, 25(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319109
6.
BellasM. L. (1999). Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100107
7.
BennettS. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170
ChamberlainM. S., & HickeyJ. S. (2001). Student evaluation of faculty performance: The role of gender expectations in differential evaluations. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(2), 3–14.
10.
CorberaE.AnguelovskiI.Honey-RosésJ., & Ruiz-MallénI. (2020). Academia in the time of COVID-19: Towards an ethics of care. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1757891
11.
DhanpatN. (2016). Emotional labor in academe. Challenges faced. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(3-2).2016.14
12.
DonnellyK.TwengeJ. M.ClarkM. A.ShaikhS. K.Beiler-MayA., & CarterN. T. (2016). Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 41–54. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684315590774
13.
EdwardsL. H.HolmesM. H., & SowaJ. E. (2019). Including women in public affairs departments: Diversity is not enough. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565051
14.
El AlayiA.Hansen-BrownA. A., & CeynarM. (2018). Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79(3–4), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0872-6
15.
EnarsonE., & ChakrabartiP. G. D. (2009). Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives. Sage.
16.
GaynorT. S., & WilsonM. E. (2020). Social vulnerability and equity: The disproportionate impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13264
17.
GrandeyS.DiefendorffJ., & RuppD. E. (2013). Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work. Taylor & Francis.
18.
Grier-ReedT.MaplesA.Williams-WengerdA., & McGeeD. (2020). The emergence of racialized labor and racial battle fatigue in the African American student network. Journal Committted to Social Change on Race and Ethnicity, 6(2), 94–135. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2020.6.2.95-135.
19.
Grier-ReedT.SaidR., & QuiñonesM. (2021). From antiblackness to cultural health in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020057
20.
GuyM. E. (2020). To catch the sparrow that has flown. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1759760
21.
GuyM. E.MastracciS. H., & YangS.-B. (2019). The Palgrave handbook of global perspectives on emotional labor in public service. Springer International Publishing.
22.
GuyM.E., & McCandlessS.A. (2020). Achieving social equity: From problems to solutions. Melvin & Leigh.
23.
GuyM. E., & NewmanM. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00373.x
24.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A., & MastracciS. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Routledge.
25.
HarrisM.SellersS. L.ClergeO., & GoodingF. W. (Eds.). (2017). Stories from the front of the room: How higher education faculty of color overcome challenges and thrive in the academy. Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
HendersonD. J.WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.BommerW. H., & TetrickL. E. (2008). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012678
27.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
HumphreyN. M. (2021a). Emotional labor and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis. Public Administration, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12818
30.
HumphreyN. M. (2021b). Emotional labor and professionalism: Finding balance at the local level. State and Local Government Review, 53(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X211048847
31.
HumphreyN. M. (2021c). Racialized emotional labor: An unseen burden in the public sector. Administration & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211037583
Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D.RubensteinA. L.LongD. M.OdioM. A.BuckmanB. R.ZhangY., & Halborsen-GanepolaM. D. (2013). A meta-analytic structural model of dispositional affectivity and emotional labor. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 47–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12009
34.
LawlessB. (2018). Documenting a labor of love: Emotional labor as academic labor. Review of Communication, 18(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1438644
35.
LermaV.HamiltonL. T., & NielsenK. (2020). Racialized equity labor, university appropriation and student resistance. Social Problems, 67(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz011
LoganE.BlountS.MendozaL.PittmanC.RayR., & Truillo-PaganN. (2013). Double consciousness: Faculty of color teaching students of color about race. In HaltinnerK. (Ed.), Teaching race and anti-racism in contemporary America (pp. 123–140). Springer.
38.
MartinE. (1999). Changing academic work: Developing the learning university. SRHE & Open University.
39.
MastracciS. J.GuyM. E., & NewmanM. A. (2014). Emotional labor and crisis response: Working on the razor’s edge. Routledge.
40.
McCandlessS.BishuS.G.Gomez HernandezM.Paredes ErasoE., and SabharwalM. (2022). A Long Road: Patterns and Prospects for Social Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Public Administration. Public Administration. Accepted Author Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12830
41.
McDonaldB. D. (2020). Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education. Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154
42.
MorrisJ. A., & FeldmanD. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academic of Management Review, 21(4), 986–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/259161
43.
MottetT. P., & BeebeS. A. (2006). Foundations of instructional communication. In MottettT. P.RichmondV. P., & McCroskeyJ. C. (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 3–32). Allyn & Bacon.
44.
MuricG.LermanK., & FerraraE. (2021). Gender disparity in the authorship of biomedical research publications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e25379. https://doi.org/10.2196/25379
45.
NewmanM. A.GuyM. E., & MastracciS. H. (2008). Beyond cognition: Affective leadership and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01935.x
46.
OgbonnaE., & HarrisL. C. (2004). Work intensification and emotional labor among UK university lecturers: An exploratory study. Organisation Studies, 25(7), 1185–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046315
47.
OzturkH.BahcecikN.OzcelikS. K., & KemerA. S. (2015). Emotional labor levels of nurse academicians. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.912
48.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA., & Recascino WiseL. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty Years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x
49.
PettsA. L., & GarzaA. N. (2021). Manipulating diversity: How diversity regimes at US universities can reinforce whiteness. Sociology Compass, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12925
50.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage.
51.
SchaferJ. G.HatcherW., & McDonaldB. D. (2020). Academics of PA or: How we learned to stop working and find some balance. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(4), 306–408. doi:10.1080/15236803.2020.1841999.
52.
SpragueJ., & MassoniK. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53(11–12), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
53.
StaniscuaskiF.KmetzschL.SolettiR. C.ZandonaE., & de OlivieraL. (2021). Gender, race, and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: From survey to action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663252
54.
ThomasN. (2019). In the service of social equity: Leveraging the experiences of African American women professors. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565041
55.
TunguzS. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Emotional labor in academia varies with tenure and gender. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914919
56.
ViglioneG. (2020). Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here’s what the data say. Nature, 581(7809), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01294-9
57.
WarnerR. M. (2012). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage.
58.
WilliamsA. A.BryantZ., & CarvellC. (2019). Uncompensated emotional labor, racial battle fatigue, and (in)civility in digital spaces. Sociology Compass, 13(2), e12658. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12658
59.
WinogradK. (2003). The functions of teacher emotions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Teachers College Board, 105(9), 1641–1673. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00304.x
60.
WrightJ. E., & MerrittC. C. (2020). Social equity and COVID-19: The case of African Americans. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13251
61.
YaghiA. (2021). Impact of online education on anxiety and stress among undergraduate public affairs students: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2021.1954469
62.
YangS.-B., & GuyM. E. (2021). Comparing public servants’ behavior in South Korea and the United States: How emotional labor moderates the relationship between organizational commitment and job performance. Public Administration, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12794
63.
YoungS. L.WileyK. K., & SearingE. A. M. (2020). “Squandered in real time”: How public theory underestimated the public administration-politics dichotomy. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020941669
