Considerable scholarly attention has been paid to various efforts aimed at preparing graduate students for careers as practitioners of public administration. One such approach is hiring practitioners-in-residence (PIR) or employing professors of practice. This paper first reports results of a web content analysis of 355 NASPAA programs that determined the extent of use of PIRs. Results show that only 17% of programs explicitly list a practitioner-in-residence. Given that less than a fifth of programs have practitioners-in-residence on their faculty, this paper provides an in-depth description of one such initiative i.e., Texas State University’s experience with the Manager-in-Residence (MIR) program. Numerous ways in which the MIR program helped connect MPA students with the practice side of public administration are described. Finally, the implications of such a program for public administration pedagogy and practice and its potential for adoption by programs are discussed.
AnciraJ.RangarajanN., & ShieldsP. (2021). Bridging the academic-practitioner divide: Findings from a survey of public administration faculty and practitioners. Journal of Public Affairs Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2021.1891396
3.
BattaglioJ. R., & ScicchitanoM. J. (2013). Building bridges? An assessment of academic and practitioner perceptions with observations for the public administration classroom. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(4), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001762
4.
BenavidesA. D.DickeL. A., & HoltA. C. (2013). Internships adrift? Anchoring internship programs in collaboration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001736
5.
BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P.BermanM., & Van WartM. (2016). The professional edge: Competencies in public service. Routledge.
6.
BushouseB. K.JacobsonW. S.LambrightK. T.LlorensJ. J.MorseR. S., & PoocharoenO. O. (2011). Crossing the divide: Building bridges between public administration practitioners and scholars. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl 1), i99–i112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq063
7.
City Managers of Tomorrow. (2019). Managers in residence: Information, guidelines, and resources. Texas City Managers Association.
8.
DetlorB., & LewisV. (2015). Promoting academic library research through the “Faculty-Member-In-Residence” program. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.011
9.
DixonK. (2017). Bridging the gap: An exploratory study on classroom-workplace collaborations, Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1892
JałochaB.KraneH. P.EkambaramA., & Prawelska-SkrzypekG. (2014). Key competences of public sector project managers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.029
12.
JohnstonT. C. (2014). Bringing business practitioners to campus: Executives in residence. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(1), 133–142.
13.
KearnsK. (2019). The leadership portfolio program at the University of Pittsburgh: Teaching leadership to graduate students. Teaching Public Administration, 37(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739419851143
14.
MosierS., & OppS. (2020). Pracademics in network of schools of public policy, affairs, and administration accredited programs: Insights from a survey of program faculty members. Teaching Public Administration, 38(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739419894039
15.
O’NeillM. A., & WilkinsJ. K. (2018). Twinned careers: Public sector practitioners in public administration teaching and research. Canadian Public Administration, 61(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12278
16.
OrchowskiL. M.CastelinoP.NgH. M.CosioD., & HeatonJ. A. (2011). The design and Implementation of a counselor-in-residence program. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 25(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2011.556968
17.
PilkingtonP.MarcoE.GrantM., & OrmeJ. (2013). Engaging a wider public health workforce for the future: A public health practitioner in residence approach. Public Health, 127(5), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.026
18.
PineoH.MooreG., & BraithwaiteI. (2020). Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning. Cities & Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1773035.
19.
PosnerP. L. (2009). The pracademic: An agenda for re‐engaging practitioners and academics. Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00921.x
20.
RawlsD. T.JohnsonD., & BartelsE. (2004). The counselor‐in‐residence program: reconfiguring support services for a New Millennium. Journal of College Counseling, 7(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2004.tb00247.x
21.
RutnerS. M.CoxS. R., & AvilesM. E. (2015). A new approach to speaker relevence using a logistics executive in residence course. Journal of Transportation Management, 25(2), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.22237/jotm/1420070520
22.
Sher-HadarN., & Bar GioraD. (2019). The rope dance: Insights into the encounter between academics and practitioners. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1589229
23.
StreetC. (2017). Commentary: Reflections on being a professor-in-residence. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(24), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04024
