This article argues that law cases are rich raw material for analytical ethics education in public administration. While scholars acknowledge that law can play some role in teaching ethics, they have aimed outside the law for ways to engage students in developing a sense of ethical responsibility. Law cases are a readily available resource to achieve this aim. Court decisions describe how parties and judges interpret the rules and ethical considerations as applied in practice, often with differing perspectives. This article describes a pedagogical approach that will engage students in critical analysis of the cases. It gives examples that have been used effectively in teaching ethics to public administration students, and illustrates how analysis of law cases can lead students to insights about public ethics challenges. This article also describes resources commonly available to university faculty for identifying and collecting suitable raw legal material.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Bar Association. (2020). Model rules of professional conduct.
2.
American Society for Public Administration. (2013). Code of ethics.
3.
AreedaP. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5), 911–922.
4.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives (cognitive domain). Longman.
5.
BowmanJ. S., & WestJ. P. (2014). Public service ethics: Individual and institutional responsibilities. CQ Press.
6.
Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 (1982).
7.
CooperP. J. (1997). Public law as a set of tools for management. In CooperP. J. & NewlandC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of public law and administration (pp. 104–120). Jossey-Bass.
DostoevskyF. (1956). Crime and punishment(C. Garnett, Trans.). Random House. (Original work published 1866).
10.
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006).
11.
GickM. L., & HolyoakK. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
12.
Hazel Park v. Potter, 426 N.W.2d 789 (Mich. App.1988).
13.
HolmesO. W.Jr. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10(8), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/132202
14.
KennedyS. S., & MalatestaD. (2010). Safeguarding the public trust: Can administrative ethics be taught?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/152368032010.12001592
KingS. M.AgyapongE., & RobertsG. (2019). ASPA code of ethics as a framework for teaching ethics in public affairs and administration: A conceptual content analysis of MPA ethics course syllabi. Journal of Public Affairs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2019.1640560
17.
LeeD. S., & PaddockS. C. (1992). Improving the effectiveness of teaching public administration ethics. Public Productivity & Management Review, 15(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380634
18.
LeeH. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. Lippincott.
19.
LeeY. S., & RosenbloomD. H. (2005). A reasonable public servant: Constitutional foundations of administrative conduct in the United States. M.E. Sharpe.
20.
MartinezJ. M. (1998). Law versus ethics: Reconciling two concepts of public service ethics. Administration & Society, 29(6), 690–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979802900609
21.
McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. (2016), 136 S. Ct. 2355 (2016), vacating and remanding 792 F.3d 478 (4th Cir. 2015).
22.
MenzelD. C. (1998). To act ethically: The what, why, and how of ethics pedagogy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.1998.12022003
23.
MorganM. (1952). The case method. Journal of Legal Education, 4(4), 379–391.
24.
MorganP. W., & ReynoldsG. H. (1997). The appearance of impropriety: How the ethics wars have undermined American government, business, and society. Free Press.
25.
NewtonB. E. (2010). Preaching what they don’t practice: Why law faculties’ preoccupation with impractical scholarship and devaluation of practical competencies obstruct reform in the legal academy. South Carolina Law Review, 62(1), 105–131.
26.
North Carolina ex rel. Horne v. Chafin, 302 S.E.2d 281 (N.C. App.1983).
27.
OswaldM. E., & GrosjeananS. (2004). Confirmation bias. In PohlR. F. (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 79–96). Psychology Press.
28.
People v. Howard, 888 N.E.2d 85 (Ill.2008).
29.
PeregoM. (2010, May). Ethics versus the law … which is better?Public Management, 2–3.
30.
PlantJ. (1998). Using codes of ethics in teaching public administration. In BowmanJ. S. & MenzelD. C. (Eds.), Teaching ethics and values in public administration programs: Innovations, strategies, and issues (pp. 161–178). State University of New York Press.
31.
RizzoA.-M. (1998). Inventing narratives in ethical reasoning in an administrative ethics course. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.1998.12022002
32.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. University Press of Kansas.
33.
Stendhal. (2002). The red and the black(R. Gard, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1830).
34.
SvaraJ. H. (2007). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations. Jones and Bartlett.
35.
SzypszakC. (2011). Teaching law in public affairs education: Synthesizing political theory, decision making, and responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2011.12001658
36.
SzypszakC. (2015). Socratic Method for the right reasons and in the right way: Lessons from teaching legal analysis beyond the American law school. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1047106
37.
SzypszakC. (2019). A framework for effective teacher-led and student-centered analytical dialogue. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 28(3), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.30193
38.
United States v. Carbo, 572 F.3d 112 (3rd Cir.2009).
39.
United States v. Coleman, 805 F.2d 474 (3rd Cir.1986).
40.
Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes, 146 A.2d 111 (N.J.1956).
41.
Visiliauskas v. Lithuania, No. 35343/05, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) (2015).
42.
WinstonK. (2000). Teaching ethics by the case method. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<153::AID-PAM13>3.0.CO;2-S
