Public administrators serve the people and implement public policy. However, stories abound that call into question public servants’ ability to represent constituents different from them. Empathy, which is the ability to recognize, understand, and respond to the feelings of another, offers a way to improve these interactions and bring them more in line with expected public service values. In this article, we explore the extent to which empathy is important and plays a role in public service education programs. Using results from a survey conducted in the spring of 2016, we consider faculty perceptions on empathy in public service education and the extent to which public service education programs are incorporating empathy training into their curriculum. Understanding this sheds light on the extent to which empathy is valued and taught in public service education programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfordJ. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production (2009 edition). Basingstoke England; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BabbieE. (2014). The Practice of Social Research (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: RP.
BeddoeA.MurphyS. (2004). Does mindfulness decrease stress and foster empathy among nursing students?Journal of Nursing Education, 43(7), 305–312.
5.
BelmanJ.FlanaganM. (2010). Designing games to foster empathy. Cognitive Technology, 14(2), 11–21.
6.
BlackJ.BarnesJ. L. (2015). Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 423–429. doi:10.1037/aca0000031
7.
BruneroS.LamontS.CoatesM. (2010). A review of empathy education in nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 17(1), 65–74. doi:10.1111/nin.2010.17.issue-1
CoplanA. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(2), 141–152. doi:10.1111/jaac.2004.62.issue-2
10.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
11.
DeenS. R.MangurianC.CabanissD. L. (2010). Points of contact: Using first-person narratives to help foster empathy in psychiatric residents. Academic Psychiatry, 34(6), 438–441. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.34.6.438
12.
DolbyN. (2012). Rethinking multicultural education for the next generation (1 ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
FollettM. P. (1926). The giving of orders. Scientific Foundations of Business Administration, 156–162.
15.
GerdesK. E.LietzC. A.SegalE. A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83–93. doi:10.1093/swr/35.2.83
16.
GordonM. (2009). Roots of empathy : Changing the world child by child. New York, NY: The Experiment, 2009.
17.
GormleyW. T.BallaS. J. (2012). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. Washington, DC: SAGE.
18.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A.MastracciS. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
19.
HalpernJ. (2003). What is clinical empathy?Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 18(8), 670–674. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x
20.
HoffmanS. B.BrandF. R.BeattyP. G.HamillL. A. (1985). Geriatrix: A role-playing game. The Gerontologist, 25(6), 568–572. doi:10.1093/geront/25.6.568
KiddD. C.CastanoE. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:10.1126/science.1239918
24.
KingC. S.ZanettiL. A. (2005). Transformational public service : Portraits of theory in practice. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, c2005.
25.
KonrathS. H.O’BrienE. H.HsingC. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. doi:10.1177/1088868310377395
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service, 30th anniversary expanded edition (30 Anv Exp edition). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
MarR. A.OatleyK. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
29.
MenksF. (1983). The use of a board game to simulate the experiences of old age. Gerontologist, 23(6), 565. doi:10.1093/geront/23.6.565
30.
MolinaA. D.McKeownC. L. (2012). The heart of the profession: Understanding public service values. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 375–396.
PaarlbergL. E.LavignaB. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-5
33.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A Systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505
SpiroH. M. (1996). What is empathy and can it be taught?. In H. M. Spiro, M. G. M. Curen, E. Peschel, & D. St. James (Eds.), Empathy and the practice of medicine: Beyond pills and the scalpel (pp. 7–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
SteinbergJ. (2014). An epistemic case for empathy. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(1), 47–71.
38.
StiversC. (2008). Governance in dark times: Practical philosophy for public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
39.
ThomasJ. C. (2012). Citizen, customer, partner: Engaging the public in public management (2 ed.). Armonk, NY: Routledge.
40.
TroutJ. D. (2010). Why empathy matters: The science and psychology of better judgment (Reprint edition). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
41.
WaalF. D. (2010). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Toronto, Canada: Three Rivers Press.
42.
WardJ.SchaalM.SullivanJ.BowenM. E.ErdmannJ. B.HojatM. (2009). Reliability and validity of the Jefferson scale of empathy in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17(1), 73–88. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.73
43.
WaytzA.EpleyN. (2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.012
44.
WisemanT. (1996). A concept analysis of empathy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(6), 1162–1167. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.12213.x
45.
YanowD. (1996). How does a policy mean? : Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1996.
46.
ZanettiL. A.KingC. S. (2011). Transformational public service: Possibilities for changing the discipline?Presented at the Public Administration Theory Network, Norfolk, MA.
