Schneider and Ingram’s seminal work on how social constructions of target populations and political power combine to influence policy design helps explain why some groups receive beneficial policies while others are targeted with punitive policies. To assist students in understanding Schneider and Ingram’s theory in policy designs, we developed a two-part assignment comprised of (1) an introductory in-class group exercise where students place specified target groups into Schneider and Ingram’s social construction/political power matrix and (2) a homework assignment requiring students to populate the matrix using data collected through a basic content analysis of mass media. The target groups were selected to match policy cases to be covered later in the course and students use the completed matrix throughout the semester for periodic reflection, reassessment, and refinement. The two-part assignment helped students develop a better appreciation of the role of values and politics in the policy process and to discern when policy disagreements were measurement or values based. The assignment also helped students see how fairness and deservedness are conceptualized differently by opposing sides in policy debates, and the role of popular opinion and bias versus formal theories of justice in the formulation of social constructs of target groups.
BardachE.PatashnikE. M. (2015). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. Washington, DC: CQ press.
3.
Bickers, K. N., & Williams, J. T. (2001). Public policy analysis: A political economy approach Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
4.
BollingerC.GonzalezL.ZiliakJ. P. (2009). Welfare reform and the level and composition of income. In ZiliakJ. P. (Ed.), Welfare reform and its long-term consequences for America’s poor (pp. 59–103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CheonA.LacknerM.UrpelainenJ. (2015). Instruments of political control national oil companies, oil prices, and petroleum subsidies. Comparative Political Studies, 48(3), 370–402. doi:10.1177/0010414014543440
CzechB.KrausmanP. R.BorkhatariaR. (1998). Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conservation Biology, 12(5), 1103–1112. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97253.x
FrognerB.MoffittR.RibarD. C. (2009). How families are doing nine years after welfare reform. In ZiliakJ. P. (Ed.), Welfare reform and its long-term consequences for America’s poor (pp. 140–171). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
GordonL. (1994). Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare, 1890-1935. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HelcoH. (2001). The politics of welfare reform. In BlankR. M.HaskinsR. (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 169–200). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
HintonE. (2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
HirshmanL. (2012). Victory: The triumphant gay revolution: How a despised minority pushed back, beat death, found love, and changed America for everyone. New York, NY: Harper Collins, Inc.
19.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.DuncanR. G.ChinnC. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368
20.
JonesM. A.StoneG. W. (2015). The US gun-control paradox: Gun buyer response to congressional gun-control initiatives. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 13(4), 167–174.
21.
JusticeC.RiceJ.RoyD.HudspithB.JenkinsH. (2009). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Administrators’ perspectives on integrating inquiry pedagogy into the curriculum. Higher Education, 58(6), 841–855. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9228-7
22.
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2004). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
23.
MarwickA. E.BoydD. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
24.
MeadL. M. (2013). Teaching public policy: Linking policy and politics. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(3), 389–403.
25.
MorrisL. (2002). Welfare reform and working poverty: Job types, wage mobility and post-exit earnings of welfare recipients in North Carolina, 1995-1999. In PivenF. F.AckerJ.HallockM.MorgenS. (Eds.), Welfare work and politics: Confronting poverty in the wake of welfare reform (pp. 129–143). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
26.
MorrisL. A.DeprezL. S. (2014). The faltering safety net in a reluctant nation: Women’s economic security at risk in America. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47(Part B), 255–268. Special Issue. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.11.002
27.
NeubeckK. J.CazenaveN. A. (2002). Welfare racism and its consequences: The demise of AFDC and the return of the states’ rights era. In PivenF. F.AckerJ.HallockM.MorgenS. (Eds.), Welfare Work and Politics: Confronting Poverty in the Wake of Welfare Reform (pp. 19–34). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
28.
Nicholson-CrottyS.MeierK. J. (2005). From perception to public policy: Translating social constructions into policy designs. In SchneiderA. L.IngramH. M. (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 223–242). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
NussbaumM. C. (2010). From disgust to humanity: Sexual orientation and constitutional law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
PierceJ. J.SiddikiS.JonesM. D.SchumacherK.PattisonA.PetersonH. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 1–29. doi:10.1111/psj.2014.42.issue-1
34.
RobertC.ZeckhauserR. (2011). The methodology of normative policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 613–643. doi:10.1002/pam.20578
35.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(02), 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044
36.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (2016, September4). The feedforward effects of social constructions: A politics of deception and division. Presented at the 2016 American Political Science Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
37.
SchneiderA.IngramH.De LeonP. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In SabatierP. A.WeibleC. M. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process, third edition (pp. 105–149). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38.
SchneiderA. L.IngramH. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
39.
SchneiderA. L.IngramH. M. (2005). Public policy and the social construction of deservedness. In SchneiderA. L.IngramH. M. (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 1–28). Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
40.
StoneD. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making, third edition. New York, NY: WW Norton and Company.
41.
TaylorJ. K.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2014). Transgender rights and politics: Groups, issue framing, and policy adoption. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42.
WeimerD. L.ViningA. R. (2015). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
WukichC.SicilianoM. D. (2014). Problem solving and creativity in public policy courses: Promoting interest and civic engagement. Journal of Political Science Education, 10(3), 352–368. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.921625
