A strong and professional civil service is widely recognized as an important condition for a high-capacity and effective government. Similarly, high quality public service education is a means of strengthening and professionalizing civil service. Quality assurance and accreditation mechanisms, both domestic and international, are tools for improving educational quality. This article examines public service education in Mexico for a strategy for international engagement with NASPAA. The purpose of such engagement would be to expose Mexican public service education to international norms and standards and to demonstrate how doing so could lead to forms of affiliation and to the development of Mexican quality assurance mechanisms. We make the case that strengthening graduate public service education in this fashion can lead both to better internal governance and to enhanced international collaboration, credibility, and competitiveness for Mexico, while also being a possible model for NASPAA’s interactions with programs in other nations similarly situated.
ArgyriadesD. (2006a). Public service professionalism and human resources development for multilateral governanceOccasional Paper. New York, NY: John Jay College
5.
ArgyriadesD. (2006b). Good governance, professionalism, ethics and responsibility. London, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 155–170. Sage Publications. doi:10.1177/0020852306064607
6.
Astana Regional Hub of Civil Service. (2016). Global and regional trends in civil service development. Astana, Kazakhstan: Author.
GrindleM. (2010). Constructing, deconstructing and reconstructing career civil service systems in Latin America. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP10-25, Cambridge, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved October29, 2017 fromhttp://web.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=7341
13.
HaskellC. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for programmatic accrediting organizations in Mexico and the United Statesreport to Consejo Para La Acreditacion De La Educación Superior (COPAES). Mexico City, Mexico
KlingnerD.GaultA.David. (2006). Mexico’s professional career service law: Governance, political culture and public administrative reform. International Public Management Review, 7(1), 70–92.
17.
LevineH.ChristianN.LyonsB. (2013). Organizational change skill acquisition and change agency preparedness in U.S. NASPAA-Accredited MPA programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(3), 479–492.
18.
MazzucatoM. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking Public Vs. Private Sector Myths. New York, NY: Anthem Press.
19.
MéndezJ. L. (ed.). (2010). Politicas públicas (Los grandes problems de México) (Vol. 13, pp. 180–203). Mexico, D. F.: D. F. El Colegio de Mexico.
ReisbergL. (2011). Where the Quality Discussion Stands, Strategies and Ambiguities. In Altbach, P. (ed.) Leadership for World-Class Universities: Challenges for Developing Countries, New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
RubaiiN.CalarusseC. (2014). Preparing public service professionals for a diverse and changing workforce and citizenry: Evaluating the progress of NASPAA programs in competency assessment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(3), 285–305.
World Bank & UNESCO. (2000). Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise, Report of the Independent World Bank/UNESCO Task Force on Higher Education and Society, Washington, DC.
