BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.BorokhovskiE.WadeC. A.TamimR. M.SurkesM. A.BethelE. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education.Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.
2.
BrockJ.AlfordJ. (2014). Interactive education in public administration (2): Strategies for teachers.Teaching Public Administration [Online before print]. doi:10.1177/0144739414521112.
3.
BrooksC.SandfortJ. (2014). Trial and error: Iteratively improving research on blended learning. In PiccianoA. G.DziubanC. D.GrahamC. R., Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 141–149). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BrownD. W. (2014). America’s culture of professionalism: Past, present and prospects.New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
CaineR. N.CaineG. (2011). Natural learning for a connected world: Education, technology, and the human brain. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
CatherineM. C.MarshallS. S. (2010). Revolutionizing education through innovation: Can openness transform teaching and learning? In IiyoshiT.KumarM. S. V., Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 263–275). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CozolinoL.SprokayS. (2006). Neuroscience and adult learning.New Directions for Adult and Continued Education, (110), 11–19.
8.
DownesS. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf.
9.
FinkL. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
GibsonC. (2005). Online learning: From high tech to high touch. In KearsleyG., Online education: Personal reflections on the transformation of education (pp. 101–113). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
11.
HessC.OstromE. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
LeeJ.GibsonC. (2003). Developing self-direction in an online course through computer-mediated interaction.American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 173–187.
13.
LindbloomC.CohenD. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
LongP. D.SiemensG. (2011, September). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 31–37.
15.
MachtmesK.AsherJ.2000. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 20–46.
16.
MackeyJ.EvansT. (2011). Interconnecting networks of practice for professional learning.International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 1–18.
17.
MeansB.ToyanmaY.MurphyR.BakiaM.JonesK. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
18.
MergelI. (2012). The public manager 2.0: Preparing the social media generation for the networked work place.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 467–492.
19.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
NeubauerB. J.HugR. W.HamonK. W.StewartS. K. (2011). Using personal learning networks to leverage communities of practice in public affairs education.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(1), 9–25.
21.
RichardsonW.MancabelliR. (2011). Personal learning networks: Using the power of connections to transform education. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
22.
RogersP. L. (2000). Layers of navigation for hypermedia environments: Designing instructional Web sites. In AbbeyB., Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education (pp. 217–226). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
23.
RoschelleJ.KaputJ. (1996). Educational software architecture and systemic impact: The promise of component software.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3), 217–228.
24.
SalmonD.JonesM. (2004). Higher education staff experiences of using web-based learning technologies.Educational Technology and Society, 7(1), 107–114.
25.
SchweickC.MergelI.SandfortJ. R.ZhaoZ. J. (2011). Toward open public administration scholarship.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (Supplement 1), 175–198.
26.
SheckleyB. G.BellS. (2006). Experience, consciousness, and learning: Implications for instruction.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 110, 43–52.
27.
SiemensG. (2005, April 5). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.
28.
SiemensG.GasevicD.HaythornthwaiteC.DawsonS.ShumS. B.Fergusonet al. (2011). Open learning analytics: An integrated and modularized platform; Proposal to design, implement and evaluate an open platform to integrate heterogeneous learning analytics techniques. Retrieved from Society for Learning Analytics Research: http://solaresearch.org/OpenLearningAnalytics.pdf.
29.
TamimR. M.BernardR. M.BorokhovskiE.AbramiP. C.SchmidR. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study.Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.
30.
Von StummS.HellB.Chamorro PremuzicT. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574–588.