Cruel to Be Kind: A Neopragmatist Approach to Teaching Statistics for Public Administration Students

Abstract

Many public administration students harbor doubts about their ability to learn statistics. Adoption of a tenet of neopragmatism can realign statistics with students’ cognitive interests and frame it as a method to advance social progress away from cruelty. This approach is rooted in John Dewey’s fusion of educational philosophy with scientific method and Richard Rorty’s postmodern upgrade of classical pragmatism. Neopragmatism recognizes that there are linguistic and contextual challenges to social science research, and that statistics is “translating” what happens around us into a language based on the math logic that is actually common to many of our social phenomena. This eases students’ arithmophobia so they can see the greater challenge as analyzing governance issues to take advantage of the explanatory powers of statistics. Students then focus on figuring out the words, rather than the numbers, that are necessary to improve administrative decisions and reduce cruelty in the world.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abellanosa

(2010). Rorty’s philosophy of education: Between orthodoxy and vulgar relativism. Kritike, 4(2), 87–104.

Abelson

(1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Adenay

Carey

(2011). How to teach the reluctant and terrified to love statistics: The importance of context in teaching quantitative methods in the social sciences. In Payne

Williams

, Teaching quantitative methods (pp. 85–98). London, UK: Sage.

Ariely

(2009). Predictably irrational. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Baert

(2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: Towards pragmatism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Dewey

(1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Elshtain

(2003). Don’t be cruel: Reflections on Rortian liberalism. In Guignon

Hiley

, Richard Rorty (pp. 139–157). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Friedrich

(1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. Public Policy, 1(1), 1–20.

Fitzpatrick

(2000). What are our goals in teaching research methods to public administrators? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(1), 173–181.

10.

Gal

(2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–51.

11.

Garfield

(1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25–34.

12.

Hildebrand

(2003). The neopragmatist turn. Southwest Philosophy Review, 19(1), 79–88.

13.

Kuhn

(1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

14.

Lindley

(2000). The philosophy of statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 49, 293–337.

15.

Payne

Williams

. (2011). Teaching quantitative methods. London, UK: Sage.

16.

Pearson

(1990). ‘ Student .’ Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

17.

Popper

(1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.

18.

Rorty

(1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19.

Rorty

(1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Rorty

(1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Rorty

(1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, UK: Penguin Group.

22.

Shklar

(1984). Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Silver

(2012). The signal and the noise. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

24.

Smith

Martinez-Moyano

(2012). Techniques in teaching statistics: Linking research production and research use. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 107–136.

25.

Swartz

(1997). Conducting socially responsible research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Tishkovskaya

Lancaster

(2012). Statistical education in the 21st century: A review of challenges, teaching innovations and strategies for reform [Online]. Journal of Statistics Education, 20(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v20n2/tishkovskaya.pdf

27.

Yanow

Schwartz-Shea

(2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

28.

Zieffler

Garfield

Alt

Dupuis

Holleque

Chang

(2008). What does research suggest about the teaching and learning of introductory statistics at the college level? A review of the literature [Online]. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n2/zieffler.html