Community development is an important area of public administration, especially at the local government level. However, instruction in community development has received little attention in the scholarly literature on public affairs education. This article details how programs that are members of the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA) currently teach community development. The article describes the curriculum of NASPAA programs with community development concentrations and courses, discusses various approaches to teaching community development, and makes a case for the use of multiple teaching methods to help students connect theory and practice. To illustrate the importance of multiple teaching methods, the author explains how Master of Public Administration students learn community development in a course he teaches. The course emphasizes the need to use community development scholarship to help public managers appreciate economic class and understand the need for community betterment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronK. A.WatsonD. J. (2010). Bringing the university to city hall: The master of public affairs in city hall.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(3), 475–485.
2.
BarefordC. G. (2001). Community as client: Environmental issues in the real world: A SimCity computer simulation.Computers in Nursing, 19(1), 11–16.
3.
BarnettJ. L.VidalP. M. (2013). State and local government finances summary: 2011.Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/g11-alfin.pdf
4.
Baruch College of the City University of New York. (n.d.). Urban development and sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/spa/academics/master-of-public-administration/specializations/urban-dev-and-sustainability.html
5.
BryerT. A. (2011). Linking students with community in collaborative governance: A report on a service-learning class.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(1), 89–114.
6.
ConyersD. (1984). Decentralization and development: A review of the literature.Public Administration and Development, 4(2), 187–197.
7.
FigueroaC. (2014). Developing practical analytical skills through mindful classroom simulations for “doing” leadership.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(1), 113–129.
8.
GaberI. (2007). Too much of a good thing: The ‘problem’ of political communications in a mass media democracy.Journal of Public Affairs, 7(3), 219–234.
9.
GinnM. H.HammondA. (2012). Online education in public affairs: Current state and emerging issues.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 247–270.
10.
Grand Valley State University. (n.d.). Sustainability in public and nonprofit organizations, graduate certificate. Retrieved from http://catalog.gvsu.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=38&poid=5193
11.
GreenG. P.HainesA. (2012). Asset building & community development. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
HallJ. L. (2010a). Giving and taking away: Exploring federal grants’ differential burden on metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions.Publius, the Journal of Federalism, 40(2), 257–274.
13.
HallJ. L. (2010b). The distribution of federal economic development grant funds: A consideration of need and the rural/urban divide.Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 311–324.
14.
HallJ. L.Howell-MoroneyM. E. (2012). Poverty, innovation capacity and state economic development in the knowledge economy.Growth and Change, 43(2), 228–251.
15.
HuQ.JohnstonE.HemphillL.KrishnamurthyR.VinzeA. (2012). Exploring the role of interactive computer simulations in public administration education.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 513–530.
16.
JakubowskiL. M.BurmanP. (2004). Teaching community development: A case study in community-based learning.Teaching Sociology, 32(3), 160–176.
17.
KempR. L. (2013). Town and gown relations: A handbook of best practices.Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
18.
KortenD. C. (1980). Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach.Public Administration Review, 40(5), 480–511.
19.
KretzmannJ.McKnightJ. (1993). Building communities from the inside out.Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.
20.
LangerE. J. (1989). Mindfulness.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
21.
MartinL. L.SmithH.PhillipsW. (2005). Bridging “town & gown” through innovative universitycommunity partnerships.The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10(2), 1–16.
22.
MathurV. K. (1999). Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development.Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), 203–216.
23.
Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA). (2009). NASPAA Standards 2009. Retrieved from https://naspaaaccreditation.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/naspaa-standards.pdf.
24.
NiA. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom room and online learning: Teaching research methods.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215.
25.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. (1984). Implementation.Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
26.
SilviaC. (2012). The impact of simulations on higherlevel learning.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 397–422.
27.
SimCity [Computer software]. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.simcity.com/en_US
28.
StoutM. (2013). Delivering an MPA emphasis in local governance and community development through service learning and action research.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 217–238.
29.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (n.d.). MPA program course offerings. Retrieved from http://www.mpa.unc.edu/node/23#771
30.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2012). Local government employment and payroll data. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
31.
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). Community development. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment
32.
WheelandC. M.PalusC. K. (2010). A profile of Villanova University’s partnership with local government managers.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(3), 487–509.
33.
WitesmanE. M. (2012). Faculty research-drive vs. community-driven experiential learning in quantitative public administration curriculum.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 775–796.
34.
WodickaR.SwartzN.PeasleeL. (2012). Taking the classroom to town hall: Advancing public affairs education through university-municipal collaborations.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 271–294.
35.
ZhangY.YangK. (2012). Knowledge and skills for policy making: Stories for local public managers in Florida.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 183–208.
