This article presents key literature on team-based learning, a research-based teaching method derived from the cooperative learning paradigm. Team-based learning is presented as a means to teach public administration students, our future practitioners and policy makers, how to practice cultural competency as they address local community challenges. Team-based learning is a pedagogical tool that emphasizes diverse teams that are properly managed, individual and group preparedness and accountability, application of key course content, peer evaluations, and team development and interpersonal communication skills. This paper provides evidence of this instructional method’s effectiveness and of the link between team-based learning and cultural competency, presents step-by-step instructions on how to effectively implement team-based learning, provides numerous examples of in-class activities meant to develop and strengthen cultural competency skills in public affairs and administration curricula, and provides a number of key resources for public administration faculty interested in learning more about research-based teaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndreS. (2013). Tips and techniques for incorporating team-based learning (TBL) methods into a college classroom.The Exchange, 2(2), 1–8.
2.
BaileyM. L. (2005). Cultural competency and the practice of public administration. In RiceM. F., Diversity and public administration: Theory, issues, and perspectives (pp. 177–196). Armonk: NY: M. E. Sharpe.
3.
BaldwinT. T.BedellM. D.JohnsonJ. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance.The Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369–1397.
4.
BlackmanA. (2012). The immediate feedback assessment technique IF-AT: An innovative teaching technique for human resource management students.The Business Review, Cambridge, 20(2), 59–72.
5.
BlighD. (1998). What’s the use of lectures? (5th ed.). Exeter, England: Intellect.
6.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (1956). New York: David McKay.
7.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R.. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8.
CarrizalesT. (2010). Exploring cultural competency within the public affairs curriculum.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(4), 593–606.
9.
CleggV. L.CashinW. E. (1986). Improving multiple-choice tests (IDEA Paper No. 16). Kansas State University: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
10.
DonovanC. P. (1998). Developing high-performance teams in the public management classroom.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(2), 147–156.
11.
Epstein Educational Enterprises. (n.d.). General summary of research on the IF-AT. Retrieved from http://www.epsteineducation.com/home/articles/researchsummary.aspx
12.
EvansN. J.ForneyD. S.GuidoF. M.PattonL. D.RennK. A. (2010). Student development in college: Theory research and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
GardinerL. F. (1996). Redesigning higher education: Producing dramatic gains in student learning (SHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
GomezE. A.WuD.PasseriniK. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions to learning outcomes.Journal of Social Work Education, 55(1), 378–390. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.003
15.
GrocciaJ. E.BuskistW. (2011). Need for evidence-based teaching.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128(Winter), 5–11. doi:10.1002/tl.463
16.
GronlundN. E. (2004). Writing instructional objectives for teaching and assessment (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
17.
HosierA. (2013). Using team-based learning in an online, asynchronous information literacy course.Journal of Library Innovation, 4(2), 111–121.
18.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
19.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings.Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–29. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
20.
KohlbergL. (1973). A cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. In KohlbergL., Collected papers on moral development and moral education (pp. 13–16). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for Moral Education.
21.
LaneD. R. (2012). Peer feedback processes and individual accountability in team-based learning. In SweetM.MichaelsonL. K., Teambased learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement (pp. 51–64). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
22.
LivingstonB.LundyM.HarringtonS. (2014). Physical therapy students’ perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the team-based learning student assessment instrument.Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 11(1), 1–10. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.1
23.
MacGregorJ. (1993). Student self-evaluation: Fostering reflective learning.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 56, 35–46. doi:10.1002/tl.37219935605
24.
McInerneyM. J.FinkL. D. (2003). Team-based learning enhances long-term retention and critical thinking in an undergraduate microbial physiology course.Journal of Microbial & Biology Education, 4 (May) doi:10.1128/jmbe.v4.68
25.
MichaelsonL. K. (2004). Getting started with teambased learning. In MichaelsonL. K.KnightA. B.FinkL. D., Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups (pp. 27–51). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
MichaelsonL. K.DavidsonN.MajorC. (2014). Team based learning practices and principles in comparison with cooperative learning and problem based learning.Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(4), 57–84.
27.
MichaelsonL. K.KnightA. B.FinkL. D.. (2004). Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching.Sterling, VA: Stylus.
28.
MichaelsonL. K.SweetM. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116(Winter), 7–27. doi:10.1002/tl.330
29.
MichaelsonL. K.SweetM. (2011). Team-based learning.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128(Winter), 41–51. doi:10.1002/tl.467
30.
MillisB. J. (2009). Becoming an effective teacher using cooperative learning: A personal odyssey.Peer Review, Spring, 17–21.
31.
MillisB. J.. (2010). Cooperative learning in higher education: Across the disciplines, across the academy (new pedagogies and practices for teaching in higher education).Sterling, VA: Stylus.
32.
MillisB. J.CottellP. G.Jr. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty.Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.
33.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). (2009). Diversity guideline. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/document/DiversityGuideline.pdf
34.
Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA). (n.d.) About NASPAA. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/about_naspaa/naspaa.asp
35.
ParmeleeD. X.DeStephenD.BorgesN. J. (2009). Medical students’ attitudes about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum.Medical Education Online, 14(1), 1–7. doi:10.3885/meo.2009.Res00280
36.
PerryW. G.Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In ChickeningA. W., The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society (pp. 76–116). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
PerskyA. M.PollackG. M. (2011). A modified team-based learning physiology course.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10), 204. doi:10.5688/ajpe7510204
38.
PoirierT. I.ButlerL. M.DevrajR.GupchupG. V.SantanelloC.LynchJ. C. (2009). Instructional design and assessment: A cultural competency course for pharmacy students.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(5).
39.
ReinigB. A.HorowitzI.WhittenburgG. E. (2011). The effects of team-based learning on student attitudes and satisfaction.Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(1), 27–47.
40.
RiceM. F. (2005). Teaching public administration education in the postmodern era: Connecting organizational culture to diversity to social equity. In RiceM. F., Diversity and public administration: Theory, issues, and perspectives (pp. 66–86). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
41.
RiderE. A.BrashersV. (2006). Team-based learning: A strategy for interprofessional collaboration.Medical Education, 40, 486–487. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02434.x
42.
SchachterH. L.LiuR. (2005). Policy development and new immigrant communities: A case study of citizen input in defining transit problems.Public Administration Review, 65(5), 614–623.
43.
SibleyJ. (2012). Facilitating application activities. In SweetM.MichaelsonL. K., Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement (pp. 33–50). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
44.
SvinickiM.McKeachieW. J. (2010). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
45.
SweetM.MichaelsonL. K.. (2012). Teambased learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement.Sterling, VA: Stylus.
46.
SweetM. S.MichaelsonL. K.WrightC. M. (2008). Simultaneous report: A reliable method to stimulate class discussion.Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 483–487.
47.
Van SligtenhorstI.BickR. J. (2011). Inclusion of an integrated team based learning session in first year histology is well received, but who fares well and who benefits?The Open Medical Education Journal, 4, 18–23.
48.
VasanN. S.DeFouwD. O.ComptonS. (2009). A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: Favorable views unrelated to grades.Anatomical Sciences Education, 2 (July/August), 150–155. doi:10.1002/ase.91
