What can traditional social science disciplines offer to contemporary nonprofit management education? We argue that the focus on context provided by traditional disciplines contrasts with operations-oriented approaches common to management education. Drawing on a sample of 110 courses from 22 programs, we illustrate the operations-oriented focus of current nonprofit management programs and discuss the likely rationales behind that tendency. We argue that nonprofit management education would benefit from greater emphasis on context-based approaches and suggest how traditional social science disciplinary approaches can be used to create distinctive nonprofit management courses. We suggest ways to integrate such courses into nonprofit management programs and consider what it would take to move the field of nonprofit management instruction toward a more integrated model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association of American Colleges and Universities & Hart Research Associates. (2013). It takes more than a major: employer priorities for college learning and student success. Washington, DC: Hart Research Associates.
2.
BanerjiG.BaruahM. (2006). Common Energy facilities based on renewable sources: Enabling sustainable development in highland areas in the Indian Himalayas.Mountain Research and Development, 26(2), 98–103.
3.
BellahR.MadsenR.SullivanW.SwidlerA.TiptonS. (1991). The good society. New York: Vintage.
4.
BurlingameD. E. (2009). Nonprofit and Philanthropic studies education: The need to emphasize leadership and liberal arts.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(1), 59–67.
5.
Chronicle of Higher Education & Marketplace. (2012). The role of higher eduation in career development: Employer perceptions. Washington, DC: Chronicle of Higher Education.
6.
CurrisC. W. (2007). Nonprofit and Philanthropic studies: Opportunities of the field to fulfill higher education’s promise.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 177S–183S.
7.
CyertR. M. (1988). The place of nonprofit management programs in higher education. In O’NeillM.YoungD. R., Educating Managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 33–50). New York: Praeger.
8.
DiMaggioP. J. (1988). Nonprofit managers in different fields of service: Managerial tasks and management training. In O’NeillM.YoungD. R., Educating Managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 51–70). New York: Praeger.
9.
DolchN. A.ErnstM.McCluskyJ. E.MirabellaR. M.SadowJ. (2007). The nature of undergraduate nonprofit education: Models of curriculum delivery.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 28S–50S.
10.
HallP. A.TaylorR. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms.Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
11.
HallP. D.O’NeillM.Vinokur-KapalanD.YoungD. R.LaneF. S. (2001). Panel discussion: Where you stand depends on where you sit: The implications of organizational location for university-based programs in nonprofit management.Public Performance & Management Review, 25(1), 74–87.
12.
IrvinR. A. (2003). Use of consultants as adjunct faculty in graduate nonprofit management programs.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(3), 181–192.
13.
KanterM. J. (2010). The relevance of liberal arts to a prosperous democracy: Remarks of Martha J. Kanter, undersecretary, U. S. Department of Education.Paper presented at the The Annapolis Group Conference, Annapolis, MD.
14.
KeaneM. E.MergetA. E. (1988). Genesis of a program: Management education for nonprofit organizations. In O’NeillM.YoungD. R., Educating Managers of Nonprofit Organizations (pp. 141–154). New York: Praeger.
15.
KettlD. F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 7–34.
16.
LarsonR. S.WilsonM. I.ChungD. (2003). Curricular content for nonprofit management programs: The student perspective.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(3), 169–180.
17.
LeducR. F.McAdamT. W. (1988). The development of useful curricula for nonprofit management. In O’NeillM.YoungD. R., Educating Managers of Nonprofit Organizations (pp. 95–100). New York: Praeger.
18.
LindbeckA.. (1992). Nobel lectures, economics 1969–1980. Singapore: Work Scientific Publishing.
19.
MartinR. C. (1952). Political science and public administration: A note on the State of the Union.American Political Science Review, 46(3), 660–676. doi:10.2307/1952277
20.
McCurdyH. E.ClearyR. E. (1984). Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration?Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49–55. doi: 10.2307/975661
21.
MirabellaR. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36 (4 suppl), 11S–27S. doi:10.1177/0899764007305051
22.
MirabellaR. M. (2011). Nonprofit management education: Current offerings in university-based programs. Retrieved March 7, 2011, from http://academic.shu.edu/npo/
23.
MirabellaR. M.WishN. B. (2000). The “best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers.Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229.
24.
MirabellaR. M.WishN. B. (2001). University-based educational programs in the management of nonprofit organizations: An updated census of U. S. programs.Public Performance & Management Review, 25(1), 30–41.
25.
NACC. (2004). Curricular Guidelines for Graduate Study in Philanthropy, the Nonprofit Sector and Nonprofit Leadership.Cleveland, OH: Nonprofit Academic Centers Council.
26.
NACC. (2007). Curricular Guidelines for Graduate Study in Nonprofit Leadership, the Nonprofit Sector and Philanthropy.Cleveland, OH: Nonprofit Academic Centers Council.
27.
NASPAA. (2006). Guidelines for Graduate Professional Education in Nonprofit Organizations, Management, and Leadership.Washington, DC: Author.
NesbitR.MoultonS.RobinsonS.SmithC.DeHart-DavisL.FeeneyM. K.et al. (2011). Wrestling with intellectual diversity in public administration: Avoiding disconnectedness and fragmentation while seeking rigor, depth, and relevance.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (S1), i13–i28.
30.
Nonprofit Leadership Alliance. (2011). The skills the nonprofit sector requires of its managers and leaders. Kansas City, MO: Nonprofit Leadership Alliance.
31.
NussbaumM. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
O’NeillM.FletcherK.. (1998). Nonprofit management education: U. S. and world perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
O’NeillM.YoungD. R.. (1988). Educating managers of nonprofit organizations. New York: Praeger.
34.
ParrishJ. B. (1967). Rise of economics as an academic discipline: The formative years to 1900.Southern Economic Journal, 34(1), 1–16. doi:10.2307/1055330
35.
HartPeter D. Research Associates. (2004). Key findings from focus groups among college students and collegebound high school students. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
ReutemanR. (2011). Is the four-year, liberal-arts education model dead? In CNBC, Education and You: A CNBC Special Report.
37.
RocheM. (2010). Why choose the liberal arts?Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
38.
SalamonL. M. (1998). Nonprofit management education: A field whose time has passed? In O’NeillM.FletcherK., Nonprofit management education: U. S. and world perspectives (pp. 137–146). Westport, CT: Praeger.
39.
ScottW. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
40.
TschirhartM. (1998). Nonprofit management education: Recommendations drawn from three stakeholder groups. In O’NeillM.FletcherK., Nonprofit management education: U. S. and world perspectives (pp. 61–80). Wesport, CT: Praeger.
41.
TschirhartM. (Chair of the NASPAA Nonprofit Management Education Section). (2006, October 5). Proposal to Revise Guidelines. [Memorandum]. Washington, DC: NASPAA.
42.
WishN. B.MirabellaR. M. (1998). Curricular variations in nonprofit management graduate programs.Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(1), 99–109.
43.
YzaguirreR. (2007). Nonprofit and philanthropic studies: Education for what?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 184S–187S.
