Public administration scholars have long examined how doctoral students in public affairs are trained to become researchers. Our study adds to this body of knowledge by examining socialization and professional identity construction processes among doctoral students conducting public affairs research. We develop a multilevel model of the organizational, relational, and individual level tactics through which they learn to become researchers. In particular, our study offers insight into the interactions between students and faculty that contribute to their development, as well as into students’ own proactivity. Our study uses interview data from doctoral students in multiple disciplines who are conducting research in public affairs. We conclude with a discussion of our model and recommendations for doctoral programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshforthB. E.SlussD. M.HarrisonS. H. (2007). Socialization in organizational contexts.International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 22, 1–69.
2.
BeckerH. S.GeerB.HughesE. C.StraussA. L. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BrewerG. A.DouglasJ. W.FacerR. L.O’TooleL. J. (1999). Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs in public administration.Public Administration Review, 59(5), 373–382.
4.
BrewerG. A.FacerR. L.O’TooleL. J.DouglasJ. W. (1998). The state of doctoral education in public administration: Developments in the field’s research preparation.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(2), 123–135.
5.
ChaoG. T. (2007). Mentoring and organizational socialization: Networks for work adjustment. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E., The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 179–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
ClearyR. E. (2000). The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined: An evaluation of the dissertations of 1998.Public Administration Review, 60(5), 446–455.
7.
DobrowS. R.HigginsM. C. (2005). Developmental networks and professional identity: A longitudinal study.Career Dynamics International, 10 (6/7), 567–583.
8.
GardnerS. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history.Higher Education, 54(5), 723–740.
9.
GardnerS. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?” The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education.Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350.
10.
GardnerS. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution.Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.
11.
GreenS. G. (1991). Professional entry and the adviser relationship: Socialization, commitment, and productivity.Group & Organization Studies, 16(4), 387–407.
12.
HallL. A.BurnsL. D. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education.Harvard Education Review, 79(1), 49–70.
13.
HatmakerD. M.ParkH. H. (2013). Who are all these people? Longitudinal changes in new employee social networks within a state agency.American Review of Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0275074013481843
14.
IbarraH. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791.
15.
JonesG. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations.Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279.
16.
KimT.-.YCableD. M.KimS. P. (2005). Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 232–241.
17.
KramK. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
18.
LankauM. J.ScanduraT. A. (2007). Mentoring as a forum for personal learning in organizations. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E., The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 95–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
LouisM. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226–251.
20.
MillerV. D.JablinF. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process.Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 92–120.
21.
MorrisonE. W. (1993). Newcomer informationseeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes.Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 557–589.
22.
OstroffC.KoslowskiS. W. J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition.Personnel Psychology, 45(4), 849–874.
23.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. W.KaufmannJ. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents.Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 235–262.
24.
RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E., The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
RethemeyerR. K.HelbigN. C. (2005). By the numbers: Assessing the nature of quantitative preparation in public policy, public administration, and public affairs doctoral education.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 179–191.
26.
RosenB. C.BatesA. P. (1967). The structure of socialization in graduate school.Sociological Inquiry, 37(1), 71–84.
27.
SaksA. M.AshforthB. E. (1997). Socialization tactics and newcomer information acquisition.International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), 48–61.
28.
SaksA. M.GrumanJ. A.Cooper-ThomasH. (2011). The neglected role of proactive behavior and outcomes in newcomer socialization.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 36–46.
29.
ScheinE. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
SchroederL.O’LearyR.JonesD.PoocharoenO. (2004). Routes to scholarly success in public administration: Is there a right path?Public Administration Review, 64(1), 92–105.
31.
SlussD. M.PloyhartR. E.CobbM. G.AshforthB. E. (2012). Generalizing newcomer’s relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality.Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 949–975.
32.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
SweitzerV. B. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach.Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1–33.
34.
Van MaanenJ. (1977). Experiencing organizations: Notes on the meaning of careers and socialization. In Van MaanenJ., Organizational Careers: Some New Perspectives (pp. 15–45). New York: Wiley.
35.
Van MaanenJ.BarleyS. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287–365.
36.
Van MaanenJ.ScheinE. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. M., Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209–264). New York: Wiley.
37.
WeidmanJ. C.SteinE. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms.Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.
38.
WeidmanJ. C.TwaleD. J.SteinE. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 28, No. 3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
39.
WhiteJ. D.AdamsG. B.ForresterJ. P. (1996). Knowledge and theory development in public administration: The role of doctoral education and research.Public Administration Review, 56(5), 441–452.
