There is a need to assess the scholarly activity of the field of public administration at the institutional level as it continues to develop as a separate, autonomous discipline and to evaluate academic and university reputation, impact, and directions of the public administration scholarly community. The authors surveyed public administration journals based upon criteria from Thompson Reuters Journal Citation Reports to determine productivity, quality, and overall institutional impact and then created an index. The study is based on previous attempts to rank universities in the field of public administration while drawing influence from the ranking systems found within other social science disciplines. The analysis shows what universities published in top public administration journals over a five-year period, 2006–2010, according these criteria. Discussions of the implications on teaching and research in public administration and public affairs are also considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsG. B.WhiteJ. D. (1994). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality.Public Administration Review, 54(6), 565–576.
2.
AstinA. W.ChangM. J. (1995). Colleges that emphasize research and teaching: Can you have your cake and eat it too?Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 27(5), 45–50.
3.
BernickE.KruegerS. (2010). An assessment of journal quality in public adminitration.International Journal of Public Administration, 33(2), 98–106.
4.
BrewerG. A.DouglasJ. W.FacerR. L.IIO’TooleL. J.Jr. (1999). Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs of public administration.Public Administration Review, 59(5), 373–382.
5.
ClarkB. R. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning.Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 241–255.
6.
ClearyR. E. (1992). Revisiting the doctoral dissertation in public administration: An examination of the dissertations of 1990.Public Administration Review, 52(1), 55–61.
7.
ClearyR. E. (2000). The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined: An evaluation of the dissertations of 1998.Public Administration Review, 60(5), 446–455.
8.
CorleyE. A.SabharwalM. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends.Public Administration, 88(3), 627–648.
9.
CoupeT. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economic departments, 1990–2000.Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1309–1345.
10.
DouglasJ. W. (1996). Faculty, graduate student, and graduate productivity in public administration and public affairs programs, 1986–1993.Public Administration Review, 56(5), 433–440.
11.
FarberM. P.PowersP.ThompsonF. (1984). Assessing faculty research productivity in graduate public policy programs.Policy Sciences, 16(3), 281–289.
12.
ForresterJ. P. (1996). Public administration productivity: An assessment of faculty in PA programs.Administration and Society, 27(4), 537–566.
13.
ForresterJ. P.WatsonS. S. (1994). An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members.Public Administration Review, 54(5), 474–482.
14.
HoustonD. J.DelevanS. M. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications.Public Administration Review, 50(6), 674–681.
15.
KalaitzidakisP.MamuneasT. P.StengosT. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics.Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.
16.
KalaitzidakisP.MamuneasT. P.StengosT. (2011). An updated ranking of academic journals in economics.Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1525–1538.
17.
KraemerK. L.PerryJ. L. (1989). Institutional requirements for academic research in public administration.Public Administration Review, 49(1), 9–16.
18.
LabandD.PietteM. (1994). The relative impact of economic journals.Journal of Economic Literature, 22(1), 77–88.
19.
LanZ.AndersK. K. (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test.Administration and Society, 32(2), 138–165.
20.
LeggeJ. S.Jr.DevoreJ. (1987). Measuring productivity in U. S. public administration and public affairs programs 1981–1985.Administration and Society, 19(2), 147–156.
21.
McCurdyH. E.ClearyR. E. (1984). Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration?Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49–55.
22.
MorganD. R.MeierK. J. (1982). Reputation and productivity of public administration/affairs programs: Additional data.Public Administration Review, 42(2), 171–173.
23.
MorganD. R.MeierK. J.KearneyR. C.HaysS. W.BirchH. B. (1981). Reputation and productivity among U. S. public administration and public affairs programs.Public Administration Review, 41(6), 666–673.
24.
PerryJ. L.KraemerK. L. (1986). Research methodology in the public administration review 1975–1984.Public Administration Review, 46(3), 215–226.
25.
RodgersR.RodgersN. (2000). Defining the boundaries of public administration: Undisciplined mongrels versus disciplined purists.Public Administration Review, 60(5), 435–445.
26.
SchroederL.O’LearyR.JonesD.PoocharoenO. (2004). Routes to scholarly success in public administration: Is there a right path?Public Administration Review, 64(1), 92–105.
27.
StallingsR. A.FerrisJ. M. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940 to 1984.Public Administration Review, 48(1), 580–587.
28.
ToweJ. B.WrightD. J. (1995). Research published by Australian economics and econometrics departments: 1988–93.The Economic Record, 71(1), 8–17.
29.
WatsonD. J.HassettW. L.HandleyD. M. (2005). The ASPA journals: Who is publishing?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(1), 53–60.
30.
WhiteJ. D. (1986). Dissertations and publications in public administration.Public Administration Review, 46(3), 227–234.
31.
WhiteJ.AdamsG. B.ForresterJ. P. (1996). Knowledge and theory development in public administration: The role of doctoral education and research.Public Administration Review, 56(5), 441–452.
32.
WrightB. E.ManigaultL. J.BlackT. R. (2004). Quantitative research measurement in public administration: An assessment of journal publications.Administration and Society, 35(6), 747–764.
