This article shows how certain practical/analytical skills are developed for “doing” leadership (Alvesson & Spicer, 2011) through what I call mindful classroom simulations in two upper-level social science courses. By drawing from various leadership definitions and Ellen J. Langer’s Mindfulness (1989) construct and through the use of an online open-ended questionnaire, participant-observation, and documentary/textual analysis, I demonstrate how well-designed and executed mindful classroom simulations afford individuals and groups the opportunity not only to gain discipline-specific knowledge and improve learning capabilities, but also to develop practical/analytical skills for doing leadership. These mindful classroom simulations can be used in undergraduate and graduate public policy, political science, and public administration courses because simulations are effective pedagogical tools for teaching both course content and transportable practical/analytical skills that successful active leaders require today. Several lessons are drawn from the teacher’s perspective on the effective use of these learner-centered mindful classroom simulations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvessonM.SpicerA. (2011). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
AlvessonM.SveningssonS. (2003). The great disappearing act: Difficulties in doing leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 14, 359–381.
3.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
4.
BevirM.RhodesR. A. W. (2004). Interpretation as method, explanation, and critique: A reply.British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 156–161.
5.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2003). Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of meaning. New York: Viking/Penguin Putnam.
6.
Diaz AndradeA. (2009). Interpretive research aiming at theory building: Adopting and adapting the case study design.The Qualitative Report, 14(1), 42–60.
FigueroaC. (2010). Pragmatic Quakerism in U. S. imperialism: The Lake Mohonk Conference, the Philippines and Puerto Rico in American political thought and policy development, 1898–1917. (Doctoral dissertation). New York: New School for Social Research.
9.
FischerF. (2002). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
11.
HallB. W. (2011). Teaching students about Congress and civic engagement.PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 871–881.
12.
HickmanG. R. (2009). Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
HurdS. N.SteinR. F. (2004). Building and sustaining learning communities: The Syracuse University experience.Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
14.
LangerE. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
15.
LangerE. J.MoldoveanuM. (2000). The construct of mindfulness.Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 1–9.
16.
LeonardT. L.LeonardN. H. (1995). Graduates’ views on the use of computer simulation games versus cases as pedagogical tools.Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 22, 83–87.
17.
LevineH.GallimoreR.WeisnerT. S.TurnerJ. L. (1980). Teaching participant-observation research methods: A skills-building approach.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11(1), 38–54.
18.
MacGregor BurnsJ. (1978; 2010). Leadership: The pursuit of happiness. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
19.
MaloneP. B.III (1995). Developing leadership skills.Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 22, 198–203.
20.
MumfordM. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
NorthouseP. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
Open-Ended Questionnaire. (2012). Survey Monkey. Administered January–May, 2012. Document on file with the author.
23.
PrasadP. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the post-positivist traditions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
24.
QueenJ. A. (1984). Simulations in the classroom.Improving College and University Teaching, 32(3), 144–145.
25.
RostJ. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger.
26.
SchutzA.LuckmanT. (1973). Structures of the life world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
27.
Schwartz-SheaP.YanowD. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York: Routledge.
28.
ShapiroJ. H.LevineN. S. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SternbergR. J. (2000). Images of mindfulness.Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 11–26.
31.
Texas Faculty Association. (2011). Students learn intricacies of the presidency by role-playing White House staffers. Retrieved from http://www.tfaonline.net/?page=news/Students_Learn.shtml
32.
WillisJ. W.MukthaJ.NilakantaR. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
YahrM. A. (1995). Student and teacher perceptions of a management simulation course.Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 22, 124–125.
34.
YanowD. (1997). Passionate humility in interpretive policy and administrative analysis.Administrative Theory and Praxis, 19(2), 171–177.
YanowD. (2003). Accessing local knowledge: Policy analysis and communities of meaning, HajerM. A.WagenaarH., Deliberative policy analysis (pp. 228–246). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
YanowD.Schwartz-SheaP. (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn.Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
