Although the numbers of women and minorities have steadily risen in the United States federal workforce, some studies have suggested that these groups are still underrepresented in high-level positions. Notwithstanding, surprisingly, only a few studies have examined the recruitment and achievement gap among disadvantaged groups in programs of public administration/policy/affairs with the aim of investigating their role as a pipeline to representation. This study is a step in that direction. It surveys academic heads of U. S. schools accredited by the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). The survey focuses on four key areas: academic support, financial support, recruitment strategies, and training and development. Among others, findings show for instance that schools with a lower percentage of students from underrepresented groups use scholarships, tuition waivers, and teaching assistantships to recruit students from these populations; in comparison, schools with higher percentages of students from underrepresented groups are able to attract faculty from minority groups at twice the rate of schools with lower percentages of students from underrepresented groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaruchY.HoltomB. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research.Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.
2.
BeanJ. P.MetznerB. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition.Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540.
3.
BowlingC. J.KelleherC. A.JonesJ.WrightD. S. (2006). Cracked ceilings, firmer floors, and weakening walls: Trends and patterns in gender representation among executives leading American state agencies, 1970–2000.Public Administration Review, 66(6), 823–836.
4.
BreihanA. W. (2007). Attracting and retaining a diverse student body: Proven, practical strategies.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 87–101.
5.
CabreraA. F.La NasaS. M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America’s disadvantaged.Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 119–149.
6.
CabreraA. F.NoraA.CastanedaM. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model.Research in Higher Education, 33(5), 571–593.
7.
CayerN. J.SigelmanL. (1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973–1975.Public Administration Review, 47(4), 443–450.
8.
ChetkovichC. (2003). What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students.Public Administration Review, 63(6), 660–674.
9.
CikinsW. I. (1966). Graduate education, public service, and the Negro.Public Administration Review, 26(3), 183–191.
10.
ClearyR. E. (1990). What do public administration masters programs look like? Do they do what is needed?Public Administration Review, 50(6), 663–673.
11.
CornwellC.KelloughJ. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data.Public Administration Review, 54(3), 265–276.
12.
DobbinsC.WalkerD. R. (2000). The role of black colleges in public affairs education. In BroadnaxW. D., Diversity and affirmative action in public service (pp. 221–237). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Geva-MayI. (2005). Thinking like a policy analyst: Policy analysis as a clinical profession. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
Geva-MayI. (2007). “We seem to have always spoken in prose…” Policy analysis is a clinical profession: Implications for policy analysis practice and instruction.Policy Studies Journal, 35(2), 135–164.
15.
Geva-MayI.MasloveA. (2007). In between trends: Developments of policy analysis instruction in Canada, the United States, and the European Union. In DobuzinskisL.HowlettM.LaycockD., Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 186–217). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
16.
Geva-MayI.NasiG.TurriniA.ScottC. (2008). MPP programs emerging around the world.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(1), 187–204.
17.
GuyM. E. (1993). Three steps forward, two steps backward: The status of women’s integration into public management.Public Administration Review, 53(4), 285–292.
18.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor.Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.
19.
HolmesS. L.EbbersL. H.RobinsonD. C.MugendaA. G. (2000). Validating African American students at predominantly white institutions.Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 2(1), 41–58.
20.
HsiehC.-W.WinslowE. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–294.
21.
JordanK. A.RiceM. F.MathewsA. (1994, Summer). Educating minorities for public service in the year 2000. Public Manager, 51–56.
22.
KelloughJ. E. (1990). Integration in the public workplace: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies.Public Administration Review, 50(5), 557–566.
23.
KellyR. M.NewmanM. (2001). The gendered bureaucracy.Women and Politics, 22(3), 1–33.
24.
KimP. S. (1993). Racial integration in the American federal government: With special reference to Asian-Americans.Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13(1), 52–66.
25.
KimP. S.LewisG. B. (1994). Asian Americans in the public service: Success, diversity, and discrimination.Public Administration Review, 54(3), 285–290.
26.
KingdonJ. W. (1973). Congressmen’s voting decisions. New York: Harper and Row.
27.
LeeD. S.CayerN. J. (1987). Recruitment of minority students for public administration education.Public Administration Review, 47(4), 329–335.
28.
LewisG. B.FrankS. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395–404.
29.
LewisG. B.Soo OhS. (2008). Graduate education and federal career success: How well does the MPA stack up?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(3), 463–474.
30.
LlorensJ. J.WengerJ. B.KelloughJ. E. (2008). Choosing public sector employment: The impact of wages on the representation of women and minorities in state bureaucracies.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 397–413.
31.
MeierK. J.StewartJ.Jr. (1992). Active representation in educational bureaucracies: Policy impacts.American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171.
32.
MillerW.KerrB.ReidM. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls?Public Administration Review, 59(3), 218–230.
33.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) Standards. (2009). Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/standard2009/docs/NS2009FinalVote10.16.2009.pdf
34.
NaffK. C. (2001). To look like America: Dismantling barriers for women and minorities in government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
NettlesM. T.PernaL. W. (1997). The African American education data book: Higher and adult education (Vol. 1). Fairfax, VA: Frederick D. Patterson Research Institute of the College Fund/UNCF.
36.
NewmanM. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement.Public Administration Review, 54(3), 277–284.
37.
OlsonC. (1988). Recruiting and retaining minority graduate students: A systems perspective.Journal of Negro Education, 57(1), 31–42.
38.
PasselJ. S.CohnD. (2008). U. S. population projections: 2005–2050. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
39.
PittsD. W.WiseL. R. (2004). Diversity in professional schools: A case study of public affairs and law.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 125–142.
40.
PruittA. S.IsaacP. D. (1985). Discrimination in recruitment, admission, and retention of minority graduate students.Journal of Negro Education, 54(4), 526–536.
41.
RaskK. N.BaileyE. M. (2002). Are faculty role models? Evidence from major choice in an undergraduate institution.Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 99–124.
42.
ReidM. F.KerrB.MillerW. (2003). Glass walls and glass ceilings: Women’s representation in state and municipal bureaucracies. Westport, CT: Praeger.
43.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382.
44.
RiccucciN. M.SaidelJ. R. (1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A missing piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle.Public Administration Review, 57(5), 423–430.
45.
RiceM. F. (2004). Organizational culture, social equity, and diversity: Teaching public administration education in the postmodern era.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 143–154.
46.
RiveraM. A.WardJ. D. (2008). Employment equity and institutional commitments to diversity: Disciplinary perspectives from public administration and public affairs education.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(1), 9–20.
47.
RogersM. R.MolinaL. E. (2006). Exemplary efforts in psychology to recruit and retain graduate students of color.American Psychologist, 61(2), 143–156.
48.
Rubaii-BarrettN. (2006). Teaching courses on managing diversity: Using learning contracts to address challenges and model behavior.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(3), 361–384.
49.
SeldenS. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
50.
SeldenS. C.SeldenF. (2001). Rethinking diversity in public organizations for the 21st century: Moving toward a multicultural model.Administration and Society, 33(3), 303–329.
51.
SheehanK.Grubbs HoyM. (1999). Using e-mail to survey Internet users in the United States: Methodology and assessment.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue3/sheehan.html
52.
SistareH. S.ShiplettM. H.BussT. F. (2008). Innovation in human resource management: Getting the public’s work done in the 21st century. Westport, CT: M. E. Sharpe.
53.
SoniV. (2000). A twenty-first-century reception for diversity in the public sector: A case study.Public Administration Review, 60(5), 395–408.
54.
SowaJ. E.SeldenS. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy.Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.
55.
StanleyC. A. (2006). Coloring the academic landscape: Faculty of color breaking the silence in predominantly white colleges and universities.American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 701–736.
56.
SwailW. S.ReddK. E.PernaL. W. (2003). Retaining minority students in higher education.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(2), 1–187.
57.
TackM. W.PatituC. L. (1992). Faculty job satisfaction: Women and minorities in peril. ERIC Digest (ED480469).
58.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
TschirhartM.ReedK. K.FreemanS. J.AnkerA. L. (2008). Is the grass greener? Sector shifting and choice of sector by MPA and MBA graduates.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 668–688.
60.
TurnerC. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 74–93.
61.
WallaceD.AbelR.Ropers-HuilmanB. (2000). Clearing a path for success: Deconstructing borders through undergraduate mentoring.Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 87–102.
62.
WilkinsV. M. (2007). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 77–94.
63.
WiseL. R.TschirhartM. (2000). Examining empirical evidence on diversity effects: How useful is diversity research for public-sector managers?Public Administration Review, 60(5), 386–394.
64.
YunG. W.TrumboC. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, and web form.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html
