This paper describes an action-based model for a Master of Public Administration emphasis in Local Governance and Community Development, along with preliminary observations during pilot implementation. This series of four courses delivers substantive and sustained community outreach in a proven developmental process while providing students hands-on learning opportunities that build core professional competencies by putting theory into practice in a real-time, reflective manner. Students who complete all four courses are uniquely prepared to step into local governance activities that build community capacity and engage community stakeholders in collaborative planning and action. Readers are encouraged to adapt and adopt this integrated outreach, service learning, and action research model to most effectively meet these dual technical assistance and learning objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbigailR. A.CahnD. D. (2010). Managing conflict through communication (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
American Planning Association (APA). (2011). AICP certification. Retrieved from http://www.planning.org/certification/index.htm
3.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BrannonP. M.Morgan DeanR. Q.Morgan DeanJ. C. (2002). Our land grant mission in the twenty-first century.Human Ecology, 30(1), 1.
5.
BrownJ. S.Pendleton-JullianA.AdlerR. (2010). From engagement to ecotone: Land-grant universities in the 21st century.Change, 42(6), 8–17.
6.
BushouseB.MorrisonS. (2001). Applying service learning in Master of Public Affairs programs.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(1), 9–17.
7.
CainJ.JolliffB. (2010). Teamwork and teamplay: A guide to cooperative, challenge, and adventure activities that build confidence, cooperation, teamwork, creativity, trust, decision making. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
8.
ChaskinR. J.BrownP.VenkateshS.VidalA. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
9.
ChazdonS. A.LottS. (2010). Ready for engagement: Using key informant interviews to measure community social capacity.Community Development, 41(2).
10.
ChrislipD. D. (2002). The collaborative leadership fieldbook: A guide for citizens and civic leaders.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Cohen-CruzJ. (2005). Local acts: Community-based performance in the United States. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
12.
CollierP. J.WilliamsD. R. (2005). Reflection in action: The learning-doing relationship. In CressC. M.CollierP. J.RetenauerV. L., Learning through serving (pp. 83–97). Sterling, CA: Stylus.
13.
Compact. (2011). Campus Compact. Retrieved from http://www.compact.org/
14.
CoteL. S.CoteM. K. (1993). Economic development activity among land-grant institutions.Journal of Higher Education, 64(1), 55–73.
15.
CunninghamB. (1997). Experential learnng in public administration education.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 3(2), 219–227.
16.
D’AgostinoM. J. (2008). Fostering a civically engaged society: The university and service learning.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 191–204.
17.
DenhardtR. B.GlaserM. A. (1999). Communities at risk: A community perspective on urban social problems.National Civic Review, 88(2), 145–153.
18.
DickeL.DowdenS.TorresJ. (2004). Successful service learning: A matter of ideology.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(3), 199–208.
19.
DonnermeyerJ. F.PlestedB. A.EdwardsR. W.OettingG.LittethunderL. (1997). Community readiness and prevention programs.Journal of the Community Development Society, 28(1), 65–83.
20.
EdwardsR. W.Jumper-ThurmanP.PlestedB. A.OettingE. R.SwansonL. (2000). Community readiness: Research to practice.Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 291–307.
21.
EmeryM.FloraC. (2009). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework.Community Development, 37(1), 19–35.
22.
FagenceM. (1977). Citizen participation in planning. New York: Pergamon.
23.
FeyS.BregendahlC.FloraC. (2006). The measurement of community capitals through research: A study conducted for the Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation by the North Central Regional Center for Rural Development.Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy, 1(1), 1–28.
24.
FloraC.FloraJ. L. (2007). Rural communities: Legacy and change (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
ForesterJ. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Foster-FishmanP. G.CantillonD.PierceS. J.Van EgerenL. A. (2007). Building an active citizenry: The role of neighborhood problems, readiness, and capacity for change.American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 91–106.
27.
GlassickC. E.HuberM. T.MaeroffG. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HarlN. E. (2003). Relevance of the land grant mission in the twenty-first century. Paper presented at the Unknown, Manhattan, KS.
29.
Institute of Cultural Affairs (ICA). (2011). ICA Certified ToP Facilitator Program. Retrieved from http://www.ica-usa.org/?page=topfacilitator
30.
International Association for Public Participation (IAP2). (2007). Spectrum of public Participation (p. 1). Thornton, CO: Author.
31.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA). (2011). ICMA University. Retrieved from http://icma.org/en/university/home
32.
ImperialM. T.PerryJ. L.KatulaM. C. (2007). Incorporating service learning into public affairs programs: Lessons from the literature.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 243–264.
33.
JacobyB. (2003). Fundamentals of service learning partnerships. In JacobyB., Buildng partnerships for service learning (pp. 1–29). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
34.
KanerS.LindL.ToldiC.FiskS.BergerD. (1996). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decisionmaking. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
35.
Kellogg Commission. (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. In Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities (Vol. 1, pp. 1–41). New York: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
36.
Kellogg Commission. (1999a). Returning to our roots: A learning society. In Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities (Vol. 4, pp. 1–53). New York: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
37.
Kellogg Commission. (1999b). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. In Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities (Vol. 3, pp. 1–57). New York: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
38.
Kellogg Commission. (2000). Returning to our roots: A coherent campus culture. In Kellogg Commission on the future of state and land-grant universities (Vol. 5, pp. 1–58). New York: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
39.
KillianJ. (2004). Pedagogical experimentation: Combining traditional, distance, and service learning techniques.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(3), 209–224.
40.
KingC. S.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic participation in public administration.Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317–326.
41.
KramerR. (2007). How might action learning be used to develop the emotional intelligence and leadership capacity of public administrators?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 205–242.
42.
KretzmannJ. P.McKnightJ. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications.
43.
LambrightK. T. (2008). Lessons outside of the classroom: Examining the effectiveness of service learning projects at achieving learning objectives.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 205–217.
44.
LambrightK. T.LuY. (2009). What impacts the learning in service learning? An examination of project structure and student characteristics.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(4), 425–444.
45.
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC). (2011). Retrieved from http://www.lisc.org/
46.
LoveridgeS. (2008). Strategies for economic development partnerships with institutions of higher learning. In NizalovD.ReeseL.OckmanH., Municipal development toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.municipaltoolkit.org/en/about/
47.
LoveridgeS.PleinL. C. (2000). Catalyzing local leadership and infrastructure development. In SchaeferP. V.LoveridgeS., Small town and rural economic development: A case studies approach (pp. 11–20). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
48.
MarréA. W.WeberB. A. (2010). Assessing community capacity and social capital in rural America: Lessons from two rural observatories.Community Development, 41(1), 92–107.
49.
MillerM. A. (1990). Exploring rural community readiness for participation in community and natural resource development extension education programs.Columbus: The Ohio State University.
50.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administraiton (NASPAA). (2009). NASPAA Accreditation Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
51.
National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation (NCDD). (2010). Resource Guide for Public Engagement. Boiling Springs, PA: Author.
52.
NewcomerK. E.AllenH. (2010). Public service education: Adding value in the public interest.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 207–229.
53.
NorrisF. H.StevensS. P.PfefferbaumB.WycheK. F.PfefferbaumR. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness.American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150.
54.
NozickM. (1999). Sustainable development begins at home: Community solutions to global problems. In PierceJ. T.DaleA., Communities, development and sustainability across Canada (pp. 3–26). Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
55.
OrszagP. R.BarnesM.CarrionA.SummersL. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. Washington, DC: The White House.
56.
OwenH. (2008). Open space technology: A user’s guide (3rd ed.; revised, expanded, updated). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
57.
PerringsC. (1998). Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems.Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 503–520.
58.
PerryR. W.LindellM. K. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process.Disasters, 27(4), 336–350.
59.
PleinL. C.MorrisJ. (2005). Promoting smart growth through participation and partnership: The community design team in rural West Virginia. In WiewelW.KnaapG.-J., Partnerships for smart growth:University-community collaboration for better public places (pp. 165–180). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
60.
PrettyJ.GujitI.ScoonesI.ThompsonJ. (1995). Participatory learning and action: A trainer’s guide. London, England: International Institute for Environment and Development.
61.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. New York: Simon & Schuster.
62.
RobertsN. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation.American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353.
63.
SanoffH. (1978). Designing with community participation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64.
SanoffH. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
65.
ScottJ. (1991). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
66.
SelskyJ. W.SmithA. E. (1994). Community entrepreneurship: A framework for social change leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 5(3–4), 277–296.
67.
Service-Learning. (2002). Learning in deed: The power of service-learning for American Schools (pp. 1–58). Newton, MA: National Commission on Service-Learning.
68.
SpainerG. B. (1999). Enhancing the quality of life: A model for the 21st century land-grant university.Applied Developmental Science, 3(4), 199–205.
69.
StephensonM. J. (2011). Conceiving land grant university community engagement as adaptive leadership.Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 61(1), 95–108.
70.
StiversC. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration.Public Administration Review, 54(4), 364–369.
71.
ThiagarajanS.ParkerG. (1999). Teamwork and teamplay: Games and activities for building and training teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeffer.
72.
United Way. (2005). Connecting program outcomes measurement to community impact. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America.
73.
WaldnerL. S.HunterD. (2008). Client-based courses: Variations in service learning.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 219–239.
74.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social networks analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
75.
WestE. (1997). 201 Icebreakers: group mixers, warm-ups, energizers, and playful activities. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
76.
WhitakerG. E.BernerM. (2004). Learning through action: How MPA public service team projects help students learn research and management skills.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(4), 279–294.
