When NASPAA adopted new accreditation standards in 2009, it effectively placed public service values at the heart of the public administration curriculum. The efficacy of this approach is directly tied to the use that administrators make of public service values in the field. To explore whether and how public service values influence administrative behavior and decision making, this study used survey and qualitative interview data from a sample of 52 Midwestern state and local public administrators. Additionally, it used grounded theory methodology to develop a theoretical model that explains the link between public service values and the administrative behavior and decision making of practitioners. Data and conclusions drawn from the interviews, along with the results from a survey of administrative values, led us to conclude that administrators utilize a combination of ethical, professional, democratic, and human values to maintain legitimacy. In the public administrative context, legitimacy was understood by administrators to include personal credibility, professional competence, respect for democratic principles, and the ability to maintain positive relationships with citizens and colleagues. The article concludes with suggestions for further incorporation of public service values into the public administration curriculum.
BaileyS. (1964). Ethics and the public service. Public Administration Review, 24(4), 234–243.
3.
BenthamJ. (1789/1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
4.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5.
BrudneyJ.HebertF.WrightD. (2000). From organizational values to organizational roles: Examining representative bureaucracy in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3), 491–512.
6.
ChristensenR.GoerdelH.Nicholson-CrottyS. (2011). Management, law, and the pursuit of the public good in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 125–140.
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
DenhardtR.DenhardtJ. (2006). Public administration: An action orientation (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
9.
Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U. S. 352 (1976).
10.
FairholmM.FairholmG. (2009). Understanding leadership perspectives: Theoretical and practical approaches. New York: Springer.
11.
Federal Tort Claims Act. (1946). PL 100–694. 60 Stat. 842. 28 U. S.C. 2671.
12.
FredericksonH. G.HartD. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547–553.
13.
Getha-TaylorH. (2009). Managing the “new normalcy” with values-based leadership: Lessons from Admiral James Loy. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 200–206.
14.
Goldberg v. Kelley, 397 U. S. 254 (1970).
15.
HallD. (2005). Administrative law: Bureaucracy in a democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
HartmusD. (2008). Teaching constitutional law to public administrators. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(3), 353–360.
17.
HatchM. J. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
HenryN.GoodsellC.LynnL.Jr.StiversC.WamsleyG. (2009). Understanding excellence in public administration: The report of the Task Force on Educating for Excellence in the Master of Public Administration Degree of the American Society for Public Administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(2), 117–133.
19.
JorgensenT. (1999). The public sector in an in-between time: Searching for new public values. Public Administration, 77(3), 565–584.
20.
KantI. (1785/1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals.GregorM. (Trans.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KernaghanK. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711–719.
22.
MandellM. (2009). Public values as a core element of NASPAA. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(3), 261–267.
23.
MenzelD. (2003). Public administration as a profession. Public Integrity, 5(3), 239–249.
24.
MolinaA. D. (2009). Values in public administration: The role of organizational culture. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 12(2), 266–279.
25.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). (2009, October 16). Accreditation Standards for Master’s Degree Programs. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/doc/NS2009FinalVote10.16.2009.pdf
26.
PaarlbergL.PerryJ. (2007). Values management: Aligning employee values and organizational goals. American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 387–408.
27.
PerryJ. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181–198.
28.
PetersR.FilipovaA. (2009). Optimizing cognitive dissonance literacy in ethics education. Public Integrity, 11(3), 201–219.
29.
PosnerB.SchmidtW. (1994). An updated look at the values of federal government executives. Public Administration Review, 54(1), 20–25.
30.
RokeachM. (1968). A theory of organization and change within value attitude systems. Journal of Social Issues, XXIV(1), 13–33.
31.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.
32.
RouillardC.GirouxD. (2005). Public administration and the managerialist fervour for values and ethics: Of collective confusion in control societies. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27(2), 330–357.
33.
RutgersM. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 30(1), 92–113.
34.
ScheinE. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
ShareefR. (2008). Teaching public sector ethics to graduate students: The public values/public failure decision-making model. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(3), 285–295.
36.
SeldenS.BrewerG.BrudneyJ. (1999). Reconciling competing values in public administration: Understanding the administrative role concept. Administration & Society, 31(2), 171–204.
37.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
SpicerM. (2001). Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Administrative Theory and Practice, 23(4), 507–528.
39.
StiversC. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public adminsitration. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 364–369.
40.
StoutM. (2009). Enhancing professional socialization through the metaphor of tradition. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(3), 289–316.
41.
SwansonC.TerritoL.TaylorR. (1988). Police administration: Structure, processes, and behavior. New York: Macmillan.
42.
van der WalZ. (2008). Value solidity: Differences, similarities, and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business. PhD dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam.
43.
van der WalZ.HubertsL. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector values. American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285.
44.
Van WartM. (1998). Changing public sector values. New York: Garland Publishing.
45.
WagenaarH. (1999). Value pluralism in public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 21, 443–449.
46.
WaldoD. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of public administration (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes & Meier.
