Consideration of the law and the legal process is essential for students of public affairs who are preparing for responsibilities as leaders, managers, and policy makers. In their foundational courses, public affairs students are likely to encounter political theories about the constitutional law framework on which administrative authority is based. They may also have an option to study discrete aspects of the law deemed especially relevant to public administration, such as agency rulemaking or basic federal employment law. This article argues that public affairs students should have the opportunity to study law in a course designed to integrate consideration of legal foundations, a range of basic law subjects that public officials commonly encounter, and practical concerns such as complying with public ethics laws, managing litigation, and hiring lawyers. With the benefit of such an integrated approach, students will more clearly see the interrelationship of policy and law, further develop analytical and decision-making skills, and better understand the importance of personal responsibility for promoting the rule of law from which their authority will be derived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldT. W. (1930–1931). Criminal attempts—The rise and fall of an abstraction.Yale Law Journal, 40, 53–80.
2.
BainK. (2004). What the best college teachers do.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BeckettJ.KoenigH. O. (Eds.). (2005). Public administration and law. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
4.
BarryD. D.WhitcombH. R. (2005). The legal foundations of public administration (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
5.
BermanE. M.BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P.Van WartM. R. (Eds.). (2009). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
CollinsA. A.StevensA. L. (1982). Goals and strategies of inquiry teaching. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology.Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum Associates.
7.
CooperP. J. (1997). Public law as a set of tools for management. In CooperP. J.NewlandC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of public law and administration (pp. 104–120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CooperP. J. (2005). Cases on public law and public administration. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9.
CooperP. J. (2007). Public law and public administration (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10.
CooperP. J.NewlandC. A. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of public law and administration (5th ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Frankel v. Board of County Commissioners, 39 P.3d 420 (Wyo. 2002).
12.
FullerL. L. (1964). The morality of law.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Griswoldv. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965).
14.
HartmusD. M. (2009). Teaching constitutional law to public administrators.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14, 353–360.
15.
HayesS. W.KearneyR.CoggburnJ. D. (2008). Public human resource management: Problems and prospects (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
HurY.HackbartM. (2009). MPA vs. MPP: A distinction without a difference?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15, 397–424.
17.
KennedyD. (1982). Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy.Journal of Legal Education, 32, 91–615.
18.
KlingnerD. E.NalbandianJ.LlorensJ. (Eds.). (2009). Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies. (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
19.
KraftM. E.FurlongS. R. (2009). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20.
LeeY. S.RosenbloomD. H. (2005). A reasonable public servant: Constitutional foundations of administrative conduct in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
21.
LeviE. H. (1962). An introduction to legal reasoning.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
LynnL. E.Jr. (2009). Restoring the rule of law to public administration: What Frank Goodnow got right and Leonard White didn’t.Public Administration Review, 69, 803–812.
23.
MilakovichM. E.GordonG. J. (2009). Public administration in America (10th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth-Cengage Learning.
24.
MoeR. C.GilmourR. S. (1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected foundation of public law.Public Administration Review, 55, 135–146.
25.
MooreD. T. (2007). Critical thinking and intelligence analysis: CSIR occasional paper number fourteen. Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College.
26.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA), Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation. (2008). General information and standards for professional masters degree programs.Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U. S. 825 (1987).
28.
OswaldM. E.GrosjeanS. (2004). Confirmation bias. In PohlR. F. (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 79–96). New York: Psychology Press.
29.
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U. S. 156 (1972).
30.
PaulR.ElderL. (2004). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools.Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
31.
PfiffnerJ. M.PresthusR. (1967). Public administration (5th ed.). New York: Ronald Press.
32.
PynesJ. E. (2009). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations: A strategic approach (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
RobertsR. (2009). Teaching law in public administration programs.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14, 361–381.
34.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
35.
RosenbloomD. H. (2003). Administrative law for public managers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36.
RosenbloomD. H. (2005). Public administration theory and separation of powers. In BeckettJ.KoenigH. O. (Eds.), Public administration and law (pp. 7–21). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
37.
RosenbloomD. H.KravchukR.ClerkinR. (2008). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
38.
SchuckP. H. (1998). Lawyers and policymakers in government.Law & Contemporary Problems, 61, 7–18.
39.
ShafritzJ. M.HydeA. C.ParkesS. J. (Eds.). (2005). Classics of public administration. Belmont, CA: Thompson-Wadsworth.
40.
ShafritzJ. M.RussellE. W.BorickC. (2009). Introducing public administration (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
41.
StillmanR. (2009). Public administration: Concepts and cases (9th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
42.
WangerinP. T. (1997). The problem of parochialism in legal education.Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 5, 441–468.
