Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents an in-depth examination of the validity of the admission factors employed by a NASPAA-accredited MPA program. Admission factors are examined to determine if particular factors, or a set of factors, are most indicative of an applicant’s potential achievement in the MPA program as measured by a student’s final grade point average (GPA) in the program. The study uses truncated regression techniques to analyze student records in order to determine the relative significance of a set of commonly collected admissions information. We find that the best predictor of success in the MPA program, as measured by final GPA in the program, is the applicant’s undergraduate GPA. This finding brings into question the utility of much of the information collected in a typical MPA program application.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

A. J.

Hancock

(2000). Work experience as a predictor of MBA performance. College Student Journal, 34, 211–216.

Bowman

J. S.

(1988). Admission practices in Master of Public Administration programs: A nationwide study. Public Administration Review, 49, 867–875.

Breaux

D. A.

Clynch

E. J.

Morris

J. C.

(2003). The core content of NASPAA-accredited programs: Fundamentally alike or different? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9, 259–273.

Gibson

P. A.

Leavitt

W. L.

Lombard

J. R.

Morris

J. C.

(2007). Acknowledging the “professional” in professional degree programs: Waiving the standardized exam for in-service applicants to a MPA program. College Student Journal, 41, 872–885.

Halberstam

Redstone

(2005). The predictive value of admissions materials on objective and subjective measures of graduate school performance in speech-language pathology. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 27, 261–272.

House

J. D.

(1994). Gender differences in prediction of grade performance from Graduate Record Examination scores. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128, 695–698.

House

J. D.

(1998). Age differences in prediction of student achievement from graduate examination scores. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 257–260.

House

J. D.

Keeley

E. J.

. (1995). Differential prediction of adult student performance from Miller Analogies Test scores. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 157, 501–504.

(1998). Predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examination in education. Psychological Reports, 82, 899–904.

10.

NASPAA. (2006). General information and standards for professional Master’s Degree programs: Section 6.0 admission of students. Washington, DC: National Association for Schools of Public Affairs and Administration. Retrieved from www.naspaa.org/accreditation/seeking/reference/standards.asp

11.

Oldfield

Hutchinson

(1996). Using Graduate Record Examination scores and partial grade point averages to predict academic performance in selected classes at an urban Master of Public Administration program. College Student Journal, 30, 519–524.

12.

Sampson

Boyer

P. G.

(2001). GRE scores as predictors of minority students’ success in graduate study: An argument for change. College Student Journal, 35, 271–279.

13.

Sireci

S. G.

Talento-Miller

(2006). Evaluating the predictive validity of Graduate Management Admission Test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 305–317.

14.

Thompson

Kobrak

(1983). Predicting the success of students in an MPA program. Teaching Political Science, 10, 182–188.

15.

Truell

A. D.

Woosley

(2008). Admission criteria and other variables as predictors of business student graduation. College Student Journal, 42, 348–356.

16.

Wright

R. E.

Palmer

J. C.

(1997). Examining performance predictors for differentially successful MBA students. College Student Journal, 31, 276–281.

17.

Zwick

Sklar

J. G.

(2005). Predicting college grades and degree completion using high school grades and SAT scores: The role of student ethnicity and first language. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 439–464.

Examining Admission Factors in an MPA Program

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References