To address ongoing discussions about the convergence of MPA and MPP curricula and students, data were collected on career values and goals of 175 MPA and MPP students, very similar in terms of their ages, gender, and work experience and matched on university location, tuition costs, and local job market. On none of the multiple measures of altruism, intrinsic, and extrinsic job characteristics did the two groups differ to a statistically significant degree. Along with sharing a very similar career ethos and temperament, MPA and MPP students did not differ in their interest pursuing jobs in the public, private, or nonprofit sectors. Yet these siblings were not identical twins. Most MPAs seemed to already think of themselves as administrators, ranking management issues highly, while most MPPs were analysts who wanted to master quantitative analytical techniques and critique public policies. The findings have implications for MPA and MPP curriculum design and for recruiting the next generation of public servants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsW. C. (2000a). MPAs view federal employment: Incentives and impediments.Public Administration and Management, 3(3), 123–127. Retrieved from http://www.TSPPPA.gwu.edu/docs/pew.pdf
2.
AdamsW. C. (2000b). Top undergraduates view federal employment.The Public Manager, 29, 36–40. Retrieved from http://www.TSPPPA.gwu.edu/docs/pbk.pdf
3.
AdamsW. C.InfeldD. L. (2009). Surprising majority of Americans endorse careers in government.Public Administration Times, 32(7), 1–2.
4.
AverchH.DluhyM. (1992). Teaching public administration, public management, and policy analysis: Convergence or divergence in the masters’ core.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(3), 541–551.
5.
ChetkovichC. (2003). What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students.Public Administration Review, 63(6), 660–674.
6.
ChetkovichC.KirpD. L. (2001). Cases and controversies: How novitiates are trained to be masters of the public policy universe.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 283–314.
7.
DenhardtJ. V.DenhardtR. B. (2007). The new public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
8.
DeSotoW.OpheimC.TajalliH. (1999). Apples & oranges: Comparing the attitudes of public policy versus public administration students.American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 77–91.
9.
FordJ.MacCallumR.TateM. (1986). The application of factor analysis in psychology: A critical review and analysis.Personal Psychology, 39, 291–314.
10.
HenryN.GoodsellC. T.LynnL. E.Jr.StiversC.WamsleyG. L. (2009). Understanding excellence in administration: The report of the Task Force on Educating for Excellence in the Master of Public Administration degree of the American Society for Public Administration.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(21), 117–133.
11.
HurY.HackbartM. (2009). MPA vs. MPP: A distinction without a difference?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(4), 397–424.
12.
InfeldD. L.AdamsW. C.QiG.RosnahN. (2010). Career values of public administration and public policy students in China, Malaysia and the United States.International Journal of Public Administration, 33(14), 1–14.
13.
KovenS. G.GoetzkeF.BrennanM. (2008). Profiling public affairs programs: The view from the top.Administration and Society, 40(7), 691–710.
14.
LoweryD.WhitakerG. P. (1994). Comparing public administration and policy analysis approaches to public service education.American Review of Public Administration, 24(1), 25–41.
15.
LynnL. E.Jr. (1994). Public management research: The triumph of art over science.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(2), 231–259.
16.
LyonsS. T. (2003). An exploration of generational values in life and at work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carlton University, Ottawa, Canada.
17.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees.Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618.
18.
MorçölG.IvanovaN. P. (2010). Methods taught in public policy programs.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 255–277.
19.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration. (2009a). Search for a school: Searchable school databases in the U. S. Washington, DC: NASPAA. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/students/faq/graduate/schsearch.asp
20.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration. (2009b). The MPA/MPP degrees. Washington, DC: NASPAA. Retrieved from http://gopublicservice.org/degree.aspx
21.
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2010). Digest of Educational Statistics 2009. NCES 2010:013. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_316.asp
22.
Partnership for Public Service. (2009). Great expectations: What students want in an employer and how federal agencies can deliver it. Washington, DC: Partnership and Universum USA. Retrieved from http://www.ourpublicservice.org/OPS/publications/viewcontentdetails.php?id=131
23.
PublicServiceCareers.org. (2009). MPA/MPP curriculum.Washington, DC: PublicServiceCareers.org. Retrieved from http://www.publicservicecareers.org/index.asp?pageid=572
24.
RaffelJ. A. (2009). Looking forward: A response to the ASPA task force on educating for excellence in the MPA.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(2), 135–144.
25.
RivlinA. (1971). Systematic thinking for social action. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
RoederP. W.WhitakerG. (1993). Education for the public service: Policy analysis and administration in the MPA core curriculum.Administration and Society, 24(4), 512–540.
27.
SchallE. (1995). Learning to love the swamp: Reshaping education for public service.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(2), 202–220.
28.
StokesD. E. (1996). Presidential address: The changing environment of education for public service.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(2), 158–170.
29.
Trachtenberg School of Public Policy and Public Administration. (2009). Student handbook.Washington, DC: George Washington University. Retrieved from http://www.TSPPPA.gwu.edu/docs/MPA_MPP_Handbook_09.pdf
30.
WeissC. H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
31.
WhiteH. (2007). ASPA’s legacy to public administration.Public Administration Times, 30(10), 16–20.
