Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

University public affairs programs have expanded their markets and impact on government by offering an array of nondegree educational programs to government officials. Local, elected legislators and executives represent one group targeted by such efforts. Serving this market niche offers both exciting opportunities and vexing challenges to universities seeking to improve local governance. Integrating data from three sources—a survey of training programs for local, elected officials in 23 states; a survey of local, elected legislators in southeast Michigan; and observations drawn while directing a university-based institute created to serve local, elected officials—this paper examines these opportunities and challenges and offers guidance for universities developing programs for these officials. The meta-analysis finds that a large number of programs have emerged to enhance the knowledge of local, elected officials on the fundamentals of local government, leadership, basic services, and professionalism. Universities play an increasingly prominent role in such programs, and there is room for continued growth. Expanded involvement by universities can lead to improved governance and provide universities with goodwill among important stakeholders, enhanced visibility, increased enrollment, internship and employment opportunities for students, and research opportunities for faculty. Such expansion should be premised upon an assessment of the university’s financial, human resource, administrative, networking/organizational, technological, and leadership capacity for implementing such training programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hattery

(2001). 2000 survey of New York’s local government leaders’ policy issues, training needs, and technology use. Paper prepared for the Cornell Local Government Program.

Jacobson

W. S.

Warner

(2008). Leading and governing: A model for local government education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 149–173.

Killian

Vogelsang-Coombs

(2004). A model of outreach and partnership: Ohio’s CPM program. Paper presented at the Teaching Public Administration Conference. Madison, WI, February 12-14.

Leete

Maser

(2007). Helping legislators legislate: An executive education program for state senators. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 187–204.

Paddock

(1996). Training municipal elected officials: Current practice and a developmental model. International Journal of Public Administration, 16(5), 689–709.

Paddock

(1997). Benchmarks in management training. Public Personnel Management, 26(4), 441–460.

Rinehart

S. H.

Smith

K. L.

(1995). Leadership and managerial skills of county commissioners. Journal of Extension, 33(1), n.p. Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1995february/rb3.php

Slack

J. D.

(1990a). Information, training, and assistance needs of municipal governments. Public Administration Review, 50(4), 450–457.

Slack

J. D.

(1990b). Local government training and education needs for the twenty-first century. Public Productivity and Management Review, 13(4), 397–404.

10.

Van Wart

Holzer

Kovacova

(1999). The scope of public administration continuing education in universities: An exploratory study. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1), 68–82.

11.

Vogelsang-Coombs

(1997). Governance education: Helping city councils learn. Public Administration Review, 57(6), 490–500.

12.

Vogelsang-Coombs

Miller

(1999). Developing the governance capacity of local elected officials. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 199–217.

The Evolving Role of Universities in Expanding Knowledge among Local Elected Officials

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References