Online education has increased exponentially in the past five years and is now considered part of mainstream higher education. It has significantly changed bricks and mortar institutions, but has the change been effective? One of the most common concerns regarding online education is the physical separation between teachers and students (Robertson, Grant, & Jackson, 2005; Moore, 1997). In order to bridge the physical distance of online education, Shin (2003, 2002) argues that universities should enhance transactional presence. However, little is known about transactional presence and online public administration courses. This study examines Master’s of Public Administration (MPA) student perceptions of transactional presence with two groups: faculty and peers. Findings support previous research of no significant difference between teaching mediums in regards to student perceptions. Contrary to previous studies, neither ethnicity nor gender appear to play a prominent role in whether students are satisfied with the contact they have with peers or with faculty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhernT. C.RepmanJ. (1994). The effects of technology on online education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 537–546.
2.
AllenE. I.SeamanJ. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the U. S., 2005. The Sloan Consortium. Needham. MA: Olin & Babson Colleges, Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/growing_by_degrees.pdf.
3.
AllenE. I.SeamanJ. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. The Sloan Consortium. Needham. MA: Olin & Babson Colleges, Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf.
4.
BarthT. J. (2004). Teaching PA online: Reflections of a skeptic. International Journal of Administration, 27(6), 439–455.
5.
BlustainH.GoldsteinP.LozierG. (1999). Assessing the new competitive landscape. In KatzR. N. (Eds.), Dancing with the devil. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BoverieP.NagelL.McGeeM.GarciaS. (1997 , April 16-19 ). Learning styles, emotional intelligence and social presence as predictors of distance education student satisfaction. Paper presented at the 8th National Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
7.
BrownG.WackM. (1999). The difference frenzy and matching buckshot with buckshot. The Technology Source. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from http://www.technologysource.org/article/320/.
8.
CampbellH. E. (2006). Cheating, public administration education, and online courses: An essay and call to arms. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 33–47.
9.
CartwrightP. (1994). Distance learning: A different time, and different place. Change, 26, 30–33.
10.
CohenS.EimickeW.KamletM.PearsonR. (1998). The information resource management program: A case study in distance education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(3), 179–192.
11.
DenhardtR. B. (2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 526–534.
12.
EbdonC. (1999). Teaching public finance administration online: A case study. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(3), 237–246.
13.
FulfordC. P.ZhangS. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8–21.
14.
GunawardenaC. N.ZittleF. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
15.
HackmanM. Z.WalkerK. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196–206.
16.
HiltzR. S. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
17.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What’s the difference?: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. PhippsR. A.MerisotisJ. (Eds). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association.
18.
IrizarryR. (2002). Self-efficacy and motivation effects on online psychology student retention. USDLA Journal, 16, 55–64.
19.
KirkupGvon PrummerC. (1990). Support and connectedness: The needs of women distance-education students. Journal of Distance Education, 5, 9–31.
20.
LahartK.Mendez-GrantM. (1997, November/December). Programming for the invisible student — the distance learner. Campus Activities Programming, 70–73.
21.
LeavittW. M.RichmanR. S. (1997). The high-tech MPA: Distance learning technology and graduate public administration education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 3(1), 13–27.
22.
MingusM. S. (1999). Toward understanding the culture of internet-mediated learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(3), 225–235.
23.
MooreM. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In KeeganD. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education, 22–38. New York: Routledge.
24.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). (n.d). Online courses and degrees. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://www.naspaa.org/students/clearinghouse/clearinghouse.asp.
25.
NASPAA. (1997). Standards for Professional Masters Degree Programs in Public Affairs, Policy and Administration. Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA).
26.
NASPAA. (2008, January). Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA). Retrieved May 11, 2009, from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/document/OFFICIAL_DOCUMENTS_2008_standards_only.pdf.
27.
O’MalleyJ.McGrawH. (1999). Student perceptions of distance education, online learning, and the traditional classroom. Online Journal of Distance Education Administration, 2(4). Retrieved May 11, 2009, from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/winter24/omalley24.html.
28.
OravecJ. (1996). Virtual individuals, virtual groups: Human dimensions of groupware and computer networking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RahmD.ReedB. J. (1997). Going remote: The use of distance learning, the World Wide Web, and the Internet in graduate programs of public affairs education. Public Productivity and Management Review, 20(4), 459–474.
30.
RahmD.ReedB. J.RydlT. L. (1999). Internet-mediated learning in public affairs programs: Issues and complications. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(3), 213–223.
31.
RiveroV. (1998). Mortarboards without bricks. Converge, 1(2), 40–42.
32.
RovaiA. P.GallienL. B. (2005). Learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis of African-American and Caucasian online graduate students. The Journal of Negro Education, 74, 53–62.
33.
RumbleG. (1986). The planning and management of distance education. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
34.
RussellT. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University.
35.
SewartD. (1993). Student support systems in distance education. Open Learning, 8(3), 3–12.
36.
SchuhmannR. A.McGreggor CawleyV.GreenR. T.SchenkerA. (2000). The MPA and distance education: A story as a tool of engagement. Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 5(4), 190–213.
37.
ShinN. (2002). Beyond interaction: The relational construct of ‘transactional presence.’Open Learning, 17(2), 121–137.
38.
ShinN. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69–86.
39.
StowersG. N. L. (1999). Computer conferencing in the public affairs classroom. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1), 57–66.
40.
StowersG. N. L. (1995). Getting left behind?Gender differences in computer mediated communications. Public Productivity and Management Review, 19(2), 143–159.
41.
TaitA. (1996). Conversation and community: Student support in open and distance learning. In MillsR.TaitA. (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 59–72). London: Pitman.
42.
VonderwellS. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77–90.
43.
WilliamsE. (1978). Teleconferencing: Social and psychological factors. Journal of Communication, 28, 125–131.
44.
WilsonD. L. (1996, February 2). Brown U. offers on-line tutorials instead of lectures. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A19.
45.
WilsonT.WhitelockD. (1998). Monitoring the online behavior of distance learning students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 91–99.
46.
Wilson-GentryL.GerlowskiD.PritchettM.RossT.MartinD. (2006). Final Report: Graduate online education and student outcomes success. Baltimore: University of Baltimore.
