Following the dramatic economic reform and development of the past 30 years, China is experiencing increasingly complicated political and social problems that call for the government to enhance its administrative capacity and working efficiency. Different levels of the Chinese government, ranging from national to local, have sent teams of public officials to developed countries for training, in order to build a modern and professional civil servant team. This paper demonstrates how to build and maintain a successful overseas training program by analyzing a case study of a group of 10 Chinese municipal officials who were trained for six months in their United States sister city. The case study finds that several important elements, such as strong academic support, a professional government internship, and active community involvement are crucial for the success of this type of training program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AufrechtS. E.BunL. S. (1995). Reform with Chinese characteristics: The context of Chinese civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 175–182.
2.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239.
3.
BurnsJ. P. (1990). China’s administrative reforms for a market economy. Public Administration and Development, 13(4), 345–360.
4.
Centre for Socio-Eco-Nomic Development (CSEND). (1998). The Sino-Swiss M.A.S.T.E.R. project for management training and organisational development in the public sector in China: A Sino-Swiss technical co-operation project 1994-1996. Geneva, Switzerland: CSEND
5.
ChanH. S.LiS. E. (2007). Civil service law in the People’s Republic of China: A return to cadre personnel management. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 383–398.
6.
ChangH. S. (1991). Two-Year Overseas Training (TOT) Program in South Korean: A Critical Appraisal. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
7.
ChowK. W. (1991). Reform of the Chinese cadre system: Pitfalls, issues and implications of the proposed service system. International Review of Administration, 57(1), 25–44.
8.
City of Jiujiang. (2005). The decision on sending civil servants for training in the United States:Municipal Foreign Affairs Office (printed in Chinese language).
9.
City of Jiujiang. (2006). Report on the first cohort trained in the United States:Municipal Foreign Affairs Office (printed in Chinese language).
10.
ClarkeR. (1999). Institutions for training overseas administrators: The University of Manchester’s contribution. Public Administration and Development, 19(5), 521–533.
11.
DongL. X. (2007, September 10). Horizon of Chinese officials broadened by overseas training. Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-09/10/content_6699856.htm.
12.
FaJ. (2004, March 8). Civil servants wise up at Harvard. Beijing Review, 47(3), 28–29.
13.
ForresterJ. P. (1997). The rich diversity of the public administration journals: Departments and institutional setting, part 2. Public Administration Quarterly, 21(2), 209–226.
14.
FredericksonH. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
JiangZ. (2002, February 10). Millions spent to train civil servants abroad. China Daily.
16.
JulnesP. L. (2006). University-government partnerships in support of state reform: Lessons from the Caribbean. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(4), 439–460.
17.
KirkpatrickD. L.KirkpatrickJ. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Third Edition. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
18.
KirkpatrickD. L.KirkpatrickJ. D. (2007). Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluating of training programs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
19.
KuhG. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123–155.
20.
LamT. C.ChanH. S. (1996). China’s new civil service: What the emperor is wearing and why. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 479–484.
21.
LiW. (1990). Reform in the Chinese public personnel system. Public Personnel Management, 19(2), 163–174.
22.
LiouK. T. (1997). Issues and lessons of Chinese civil service reform. Public Personnel Management, 26(4), 505–514.
23.
ManionM. (1985). The cadre management system, post-Mao: The appointment, promotion, transfer and removal of party and state leaders. China Quarterly, 102, 203–233.
24.
MeekJ. WNewellW. H. (2005). Complexity, interdisciplinarity and public administration: Implications for integrating communities. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(3/4), 321–350.
25.
NishishibaM. (2007). Developing a professional training program across national borders: Key considerations for successful international collaboration. Paper Presented at the 68th American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Conference, Washington, D.C.
26.
PontiusJ. L.HarperS. R. (2006). Principles for good practice in graduate and professional student engagement. New Directions for Student Services, 115, 47–58.
27.
ShanA. (2004). Present situation, problems, and prospect of China’s public servant training. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(3/4), 219–238.
28.
TaylorS. M. (1988). Effects of college internships on individual participants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 393–401.
29.
TongC. H.StraussmanJ. D. (2003). A Master of public administration degree with Chinese characteristics?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(2), 105–115.
30.
TongC. H.StraussmanJ. D.BroadnaxW. D. (1999). Civil service reform in the People’s Republic of China: Case studies of early implementation. Public Administration and Development, 19(2), 193–206.
31.
TsaoK. K.WorthleyJ. A. (1995). Chinese public administration: Change with continuity during political and economic development. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 169–174.
32.
XuX. (2002). On MPA education engineering in China. Chinese Public Administration Review, 1(3/4), 261–265.
33.
YeL. (2004). The MPA curriculum development in China: Learning from the American theories and practices. China Public Administration Review, 2(3/4), 46–53.
