A collaborative approach to public management is critical in an era of governance that depends upon networks more than centralized bureaucracies, yet public affairs education has not adequately responded to the need to develop new tools to support analysis of complex settings. Policy field analysis is one tool that can help professionals-in-training learn to act purposively within complex policy environments. Policy fields—public and private institutions, in a substantive public policy or program area, in a particular place—shape how state and local actors work to solve public management problems, and their pursuit of programmatic goals in turn shapes the policy field. Using a well-known teaching case, the authors present a series of analytical questions and mapping tools that help clarify the structure of complex policy environments; the institutional and interorganizational relationships involved; and the resources that influence interactions in the policy field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
AgranoffRobert. 2001. “American Federalism and the Search for Models of Management.” Public Administration Review, 61(6):671–681.
3.
AndersenDavid F.et al.2005. “Integrating Modes of Systems Thinking into Strategic Planning Education and Practice: The Thinking Persons’ Institute Approach.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(3):265–293.
4.
BlairRobert. 2002. “Policy Tools Theory and Implementation Networks: Understanding State Enterprise Zone Partnerships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2):161–190.
5.
BinghamLisaBlomgrenJodi R. SandfortO’LearyRosemary. 2008. “Learning to Do and Doing to Learn: Teaching Managers to Collaborate in Networks.” In BinghamLisa BlomgrenO’LearyRosemary, Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
6.
BourdieuP.1990. The Logic of Practice. California: Stanford University Press.
7.
BrysonJohnCrosbyBarbaraStoneMelissa. 2006. “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.” Public Administration Review, 66(s1):44–55.
8.
BrysonJohnAckermannFranEdenColinFinnCharles B.. 2004. Visible Thinking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
9.
BrysonJohn. 2004a. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10.
BrysonJohn. 2004b. “What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques.” Public Management Review, 6(1):21–53.
11.
BursteinP.1991. “Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes.” Annual Review of Sociology, 17:327–350.
12.
ChoChung-LaeWrightDeil S.. 2004. “The Devolution Revolution in Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s: Changes in Cooperative and Coercive State-National Relations as Perceived by State Administrators.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4):447–468.
13.
ChubbJohn E.1985. “The Political Economy of Federalism.” The American Political Science Review, 79(4):994–1015.
14.
DiMaggioPaul J.1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In ZuckerL. G., Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
15.
DiMaggioP.PowellW.. 1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” In PowellW.DiMaggioP., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DobelPatrick J.DayAngela. 2005. “A Note on Mapping: Understanding Who Can Influence Your Success.” University of Washington: Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs. Available at www.hallway.org.
17.
ElazarDaniel J.1965. “The Shaping of Intergovernmental Relations in the Twentieth Century.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 359(1):10–22.
18.
FligsteinNeil. 2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields.” Sociological Theory, 19(2):105–125.
19.
The Foundation Center. 2006. “Highlights of Foundation Yearbook.” New York, NY: The Foundation Center. Available at http://www.foundationcenter.org/gainknowledge/research/pdf/fy2006highlights.pdf.
GalaskiewiczJoseph. 1979. Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
22.
GiddensA.1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
GoetzEdward G.SidneyMara S.. 1997. “Local Policy Subsystems and Issue Definition: An Analysis of Community Development Policy Change.” Urban Affairs Review, 32(4):490–512.
24.
GranadosFrancisco J.KnokeDavid. 2005. “Organized Interest Groups and Policy Networks.” In JanoskiT.et al., In Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 287–309.
25.
GrønbjergKirstenPaarlbergLaurie. 2001. “Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Nonprofit Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4):684–706.
26.
HjernBennyPorterDavid O.. 1981. “Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis.” Organizational Studies2(3):211–227.
27.
IsettKimberly R.2006. “Managing Uncertainties in Networks.” Public Management Review, 8(1):176–178.
28.
KettlDonald. 2006. “Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative.” Public Administration Review, 66(s1):10–19.
29.
KickertWalter J. M.KlijnEric-HansKoppenjanJ. F. M.1997. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications.
30.
KlijnEric-Hans. 1997. “Policy Networks: An Overview.” In KickertW. J. M.KlijnE.KoppenjanJ. F. M., Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications, 206–238.
31.
KlijnEric-HansKoppenjanJ. F. M.. 2000. “Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance.” Public Management, 2(2):135–158.
32.
KnokeDavidLaumannEdward. 1982. “The Social Organization of National Policy Domains: An Exploration of Some Structural Hypotheses.” In MarsdenPeterLinNan, Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
LaumannEdward O.KnokeDavid. 1987. The Organization State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
34.
LongNorton E.1958. “The Local Community as an Ecology of Games.” American Journal of Sociology, 64(3):251–261.
35.
MilwardH. B.ProvanKeith. 2006. A Manager’s Guide for Choosing and Using Networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Management of Government.
36.
MilwardH. BrintonWamsleyGary L.. 1984. “Policy Subsystems, Networks, and the Tools of Public Management.” In EyestoneR., Public Policy Formation. Boulder: Westview Press, 3–25.
37.
MilwardH. B.ProvanK. G.. 2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 10(2):359–380.
38.
O’TooleLaurenceMeierKenneth J.. 2004. “Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4):469–494.
39.
O’TooleLaurence J.Jr.1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 57:45–52.
40.
PetersB. G.PierreJohn. 1998. “Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 8(2):223–243.
41.
PetersonPaul. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
PrattJonSpencerEdson. 2000. “Dynamics of Corporate Philanthropy in Minnesota.” In GraubardS. R., Minnesota, Real and Imagined. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
43.
ProvanK.MilwardH.. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40:1–33.
44.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B.. 1994. “Integration of Community-Based Services for the Severely Mentally Ill and the Structure of Public Funding: A Comparison of Flow Systems.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 19(4):865–894.
45.
ProvanKeith G.VeazieMark A.StatenLisa K.Teufel-ShoneNicolette I.. 2005. “The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships.” Public Administration Review, 65(5):603–613.
46.
SalamonLester M.2005. “Training Professional Citizens: Getting Beyond the Right Answer to the Wrong Question in Public Affairs Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(1):7–20.
47.
SalamonL.2002. The Tools of Government Action: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
SandfortJ.1999. “The Structural Impediments to Human Service Collaboration: The Case of Front-line Welfare Reform Implementation.” Social Service Review, 73(3).
49.
ScottW. R.MeyerJohn W.. 1991. “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence.” In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
StoneMelissaSandfortJodi R.Forthcoming. “Constructing Policy Fields to Inform Research in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.
