Since its inception, the discipline of public administration has been challenged by its dual mission of educating both practitioner and academician (Golembiewski, 1977; Denhardt, 2001). Normative issues such as ethical behavior, social equity, and the impact of diversity on public institutions and policies are matters that conjoin public administration scholarship and practice. However, these subjects are not standard in the public administration education curriculum. Ethics and social equity have received intermittent attention in the professional journals and in the curriculum offerings of schools associated with the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA; Bowman, 1990; Lee and Paddock, 1992; Gooden and Myers, 2004). This study explores the question of whether the issue of diversity has received similar attention in public administration education. After reviewing the curricula at 50 NASPAA accredited-schools, this study concludes that teaching diversity in the public administration/public affairs curriculum is not, in fact, overlooked. However, our finding that the topic of diversity is relatively neglected in the published scholarship indicates a need for public affairs education programs to support such scholarship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Society for Public Administration. Available at http://www.aspanet.org/scriptcontent/Library.cfm. Accessed October 24, 2006.
2.
AstinA.1993. “Diversity and Multiculturalism on Campus: How Are Students Affected?” Change, 23:44–49.
3.
AverchH.DluhyM.. 1992. “Teaching Public Administration, Public Management, and Policy Analysis: Convergence or Divergence in the Master’s Core.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(3):541–551.
4.
BowmanJ.1990. “Ethics in Government: A National Survey of Public Administrators.” Public Administration Review, 50(3):345–353.
5.
ChangM.2000. “The Big Picture of Campus Diversity.” About Campus, 5(5):30–31.
6.
ChangM.AstinA.. 1997. “Who Benefits from Racial Diversity in Higher Education?” Diversity Digest. Available at www.diversityweb.org/Digest?W97/research.html. Accessed October 27, 2006.
7.
ChangM.DensonN.SaenzV.MisaK.. 2006. The Educational Benefits of Sustaining Crossracial Interaction among Undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3):430–455.
8.
Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation, NASPAA, 2006. “General Information and Standards for Professional Master’s Degree Programs.” Available at www.naspaa.org. (Accessed Oct. 24, 2006).
9.
DenhardtR.2001. “The Big Questions of Public Administration Education.” Public Administration Review, 61(5):526–534.
10.
DownesB.1998. “The Role of Governments in 21st Century Governance: A Concluding Essay.” Social Science Journal, 35(4):589–602).
11.
EvansK.LoweryD.. 2006. “Prescriptive Thinking: Normative Claims as Scholarship.” Administration and Society. 38(2):147–165.
12.
Frankfort-NachmiasChavaNachmiasDavid. 2000. Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 6th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
13.
FredericksonJ. G.1990. “Public Administration and Social Equity.” Public Administration Review, 50(2):228–237.
14.
FredericksonJ. G.2005. “The State of Social Equity in American Public Administration.” National Civic Review, Winter:31–38.
15.
GolembiewskiR.1977. Public Administration as a Developing Discipline, Part 1, Perspectives on Past and Present. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
16.
GoodenS.MyersS.. 2004. “Teaching Social Equity in the MPA: Reflections from the Social Equity Symposium.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2:155–175.
17.
GreenwoodJ.EgginsH.. 1995. “Shifting Sands: Teaching Public Administration in a Climate of Change.” Public Administration, 73(1):143–163.
18.
HurtadoS.2005. “The Next Generation of Diversity and Intergroup Relations Research.” Journal of Social Issues, 61(3):595–610.
19.
KrippendorfKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
LeeD.PaddockS.. 1992. “Improving the Effectiveness of Teaching Public Administration Ethics.” Public Productivity and Management Review, 15(4):487–500.
21.
MaruyamaG.2004. “Racial Equity and Diversity, Taking the Viable Approach is Crucial: A Comment on Renner and Moore.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4(1):251–253.
22.
MaruyamaG.MorenoJ.. 2000. “University Faculty Views about the Value of Diversity on Campus and in the Classroom.” In MaruyamaG.et al.. Does Diversity Make a Difference? Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms. Available at www/acenet/edu/bookstore/pdf/diversity_report/20000_div-rpt-sec1.pdf, 9–35. (Accessed Nov. 1, 2006.)
23.
MayhewM.GrunwaldH.. 2006. “Factors Contributing to Faculty Incorporation of Diversity-related Course Content.” The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1):148–168.
24.
McSwiteO.2005. “Taking Public Administration Seriously: Beyond Humanism and Bureaucrat Bashing.” Administration and Society. 37(1):116–125.
25.
NiemannY.MaruyamaG.. 2005. “Inequities in Higher Education: Issues and Promising Practices in a World Ambivalent about Affirmative Action.” Journal of Social Issues, 61(3):407–426.
26.
NorthedgeA.2003. “Enabling Participation in Academic Discourse.” Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2):169–180.
27.
NorthedgeA.2003. “Rethinking Teaching in the Context of Diversity.” Teaching in Higher Education. 8(1):17–32.
28.
OldfieldK.CandlerG.JohnstonR.. 2005. “Social Class, Sexual Orientation, and Toward Proactive Social Equity Scholarship.” American Review of Public Administration, 36(2):156–172.
29.
RiceM.2004. “Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2):143–154.
30.
RosenbloomD.2005. “Taking Social Equity Seriously in MPA Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3):247–252.
31.
SeldenS.2006. “A Solution in Search of a Problem? Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and the New Public Service.” Public Administration Review, 10(2):911–923.
32.
SmolenL.Colvill-HallS.LiangX.MacDonaldS.. 2006. “An Empirical Study of College of Education Faculty’s Perceptions, Beliefs, and Commitment to the Teaching of Diversity in Teacher Education Programs at Four Urban Universities.” The Urban Review, 38(1):45–61.
33.
SvaraJ.2001. “Public Administration and Social Equity.” PA Times, March:11.
34.
TerryLarry. 2005. “Reflections and Assessment: Public Administration Review, 2000-2005.” Public Administration Review, 65(4):643–645.
35.
TrochimWilliam M.2006. The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2nd ed. Available at http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/index.htm. (Accessed Nov. 1, 2006).
36.
UmbachP.MilemJ.. 2004. “Applying Holland’s Typology to the Study of Differences in Student Views about Diversity.” Research in Higher Education, 45(6):625–649.
37.
VentrissC.1991. “Contemporary Issues in American Public Administration Education: The Search for Educational Focus.” Public Administration Review, 51(1):4–14.
38.
WilsonE.2004. “From Social Equity to National Security: Shifting Rationales for Enhanced Diversity in International Affairs.” In “Teaching Social Equity in the MPA: Reflections from the Social Equity Symposium.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2:160–165.
39.
WiseL.TschirhartM.. 2000. “Examining Empirical Evidence on Diversity Effects: How Useful is Diversity Research for Public-sector Managers?” Public Administration Review, 60(5):386–394.
40.
WhiteS.2004. “Multicultural MPA Curriculum: Are We Preparing Culturally Competent Public Administrators?” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2):111–123.
41.
WrightB.ManigaultL.BlackT.. 2004. “Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration.” Administration and Society, 35(6):747–764.
