A popular input measure of bureaucratic success is whether the demographic characteristics of an organization's personnel reflect those of the community. Does the bureaucracy employ, for example, ethnic minorities and women in roughly the same proportion as their respective percentages of the citizenry? Given several recent court decisions and public referenda limiting the use of race and gender considerations in placements and promotions, some writers now propose that measures of diversity include socioeconomic status (SES). This study shows that the parental SES of teaching faculty at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) is far higher than the public's. Based on these findings and related literature, the present discussion offers a rationale for why UIUC, and eventually perhaps many other universities, should use social class considerations in an affirmative action plan to recruit and hire new faculty; suggestions for implementing such a class- based hiring program; and rebuttals for anticipated criticisms of this proposal.
Adarand Constructors. Inc. v. Pena.1995. 515 U.S. 200,132 L.Ed. 2d 158,115 S.Ct. 2097.
3.
BachrachPeterBaratzMorton S.. 1963. “Decisions and Non-decisions: An Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review (September): 632–642.
4.
BoatsmanK. C.AntonyJim. 1995. “Faculty Equity: Class Origin, Race, and Gender in the American Professoriate.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association.
City of Richmond v. J. A. Cronson Company.1989. 488 US 469.
7.
Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson.1997. 110 E3d 1431 (9th Cir).
8.
DahlRobert. 1961. Who Governs?New Haven: Yale University Press.
9.
DeFunis v. Odegard1974. 416 US 312, 40 L.Ed. 2d 164,94 S.Ct. 1704.
10.
deLoneRichard H.1979. Small Futures: Children, Inequality, and the Limits of Liberal Reform.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11.
DewsC. L. BarneyCarolyn Leste Law1995. This Fine Place So Far from Home: Voices of Academics from the Working Class.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
D'SousaDinesh. 1991. Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus.New York: Vintage.
13.
DykhouseCharles J.1996. “Life after Adarand: The Future Is Not So Clear.” Missouri Law Review, 61: 971–994.
14.
ElmoreNatasha. 1996. “The Supreme Court's Step in the Trend Toward Eliminating Affirmative Action Programs in Adarand Constructors, Inc. V. Pena.” Houston Law Review, 33: 939–965.
15.
FallonJr.RichardH.1996. “Affirmative Action Based on Economic Disadvantage.” UCLA Law Review, 43(6): 1913–1951.
16.
FredericksonGeorge. 1990. “Public Administration and Social Equity.” Public Administration Review, 50(2): 228–237.
17.
FreedmanSamuel G.1998. “Eddie Proves Affirmative Action Based on Class Works.” USA Today, October 14: 15A.
18.
GaleWilliam G.Karl ScholzJohn. 1994,”Intergenerational Transfers and the Accumulation of Wealth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 145–160.
19.
GewirtzPaul. 1995. “Affirmative Action: Don't Forget the Courts.” Wall Street Journal (August 2): AII.
20.
HarrisonJeffrey L.1992. “Confess'n the Blues: Some Thoughts on Class Bias in Law School Hiring.” Journal of Legal Education, 42 (1): 119–125.
21.
Hirabayashi v. United States.1944. 320 U.S. 81,63 S.Ct. 1375,87 L.Ed. 1774.
22.
HolmesSteven A.1991. “Mulling the Idea of Affirmative Action for Poor Whites.” New York Times, August 18, Section VI: 3: 1.
23.
Hopwood v. State of Texas1996. 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 US 1033, 135 L.Ed.2d 1094, 116 S Ct 2581.
24.
James v. Valtierra.1971. 402 US 137,28 L.Ed. 2d 678, 91 S.Ct. 1331.
25.
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County.1987. 480 U.S. 616,94 L.Ed. 2d 615, 107 S.Ct. 1442.
26.
KahlenbergRichard D.1996. The Remedy.New York: Basic Books.
KennedyDuncan. 1990. “A Cultural Pluralist Case for Affirmative Action in Legal Academia.” Duke Law Journal, 1990 (4): 705–757.
29.
KominskiRobertAdamsAndrea. 1994. Educational Attainment In The United States: March 1992 and 1993.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
Korematsu v. United States.1944. 323 U.S. 214,65 S. Ct. 193, 89 L. Ed. 194.
31.
LipsetSeymour MartinLaddEverett C.Jr.1979. “The Changing Social Origins of American Academics.” In MertonRobert K.ColemanJames S.RossiPeter H., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research, Papers in Honor of Paul Lazarsfeld.New York: The Free Press: 28–43.
32.
LipsitzGeorge. 1997. “Class and Consciousness: Teaching about Social Class in Public Universities.” In KumarAmitava, Class Issues.New York: New York University Press: 9–21.
33.
MalamudDeborah C.1996. “Class-based Affirmative Action: Lessons and Caveats.” Texas Law Review, 74: 1847–1900.
34.
McDonoughPatricia M.1997. Choosing Colleges.Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
Metro Broadcasting, Inc v. FCC.1990. 497 US 547,111 L.Ed. 445,110 S.Ct. 2997.
36.
MikulakBrian. 1990. “Classism and Equal Opportunity: A Proposal for Affirmative Action in Education Based on Social Class.” Howard Law Journal, 33: 112–136.
37.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Power Elite.New York: Galaxy.
38.
MortonJr.FrederickA.1993. “Class-based Affirmative Action: Another Illustration of America Denying the Impact of Race.” Rutgers Law Review, 45: 1089–1141.
39.
MutchlerJan E.PostonDudley L.Jr.1983. “Do Females Necessarily Have the Same Occupational Status Scores as Males? A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of the Duncan Socioeconomic Status Index and Nam-Powers Occupational Status Scores.” Social Science Research, 12: 353–362.
40.
NamCharles B.PowersMary G.. 1983. The Socioeconomic Approach to Status Measurement.Houston: Cap and Gown Press.
41.
Parham v. Hughes.1979. 441 U.S. 347,60 L.Ed. 2d 269, 99 S.Ct. 1742.
42.
PhillipsKevin. 1993Boiling Point: Democrats, Republicans, and the Decline of Middle-Class Prosperity.New York: Harper Collins.
43.
PopsGerald M.PavlakThomas J.. 1991. The Case for Justice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
PowersMary G.1981. Measures of Socioeconomic Status.Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
45.
RaskinJamin B.1996. “Content, Character, and Class.” The American Lawyer, 18(10): 42–43.
46.
Regents of University of California v. Bakke.1978. 438 U.S. 265,57 L.Ed. 2d 750,98 S.Ct. 2733.
47.
RicciDavid. 1971. Community Power and Democratic Theory.New York: Random House.
Richmond v. Cronson. 1989. 488 U.S. 469,102 L.Ed. 2d 854,109 S.Ct. 706.
50.
RosenJeffrey. 1995. “The Colorblind Court,” Sew Republic, 213(5)(July 31): 19–23.
51.
RyanMichael. 1989. Politics and Culture. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
RyanJakeShackreyCharles1984. Strangers in Paradise: Academics from the Working Class.Boston: South End Press.
53.
ScaliaAntonin. 1979. “The Disease as Cure.” Washington University Law Quarterly, 147 (1): 147–157.
54.
SchattschneiderE. E.1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America.New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
55.
StetarJoseph M.FinkelsteinMartin J.. 1997. “The Influence of Faculty Backgrounds on the Motivation to Teach.” In BestJames L., Teaching Well and Liking It.Baltimore. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press: 287–313.
56.
TaylorKimberly Paap. 1993 “Affirmative Action for the Poor: A Proposal for Affirmative Action in Higher Education Based on Economics, Not Race.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 20: 805–823.
57.
TaylorStuart. 1991. “A Case for Class-Based Affirmative Action.” Connecticut Law Tribune. (September 30): 18.
58.
“Teaching Inequality: The Problem of Public School Tracking.” 1989. Harvard Law Review, 102: 1318–1341.
59.
TummalaKrishna K.1999. “Policy of Preference: Lessons from India, the United States, and South Africa.” Public Administration Review, 59(6): 495–508.
60.
We the Americans: Our Education.1993. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
61.
WilsonWilliam J.1996. When Work Disappears: the World of the New Urban Poor.New York: Knopf.
62.
ZweigMichael. 2000. The Working Class Majority.Ithaca, New York: ILR Press.
