AbrahamsonE.FairchildG.. 1997. Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
2.
BurnsL. R.WholeyD. R.. 1993. “Adoption and Abandonment of Matrix Management Programs: Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Interorganizational Networks.” Academy Management Journal, 36: 106–138.
3.
CohenMichael D.MarchJames S.. 1974. Leadership and Ambiguity.New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
CyertRichard M.MarchJames G.. 1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
DiamondNancyDavis GrahamHugh. 1997. The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
DiamondNancyDavis GrahamHugh, 2000. “How Should We Rate Research Universities?” Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, July/August 21–33.
7.
DiMaggioPaul J.1983. “State Expansion and Organizational Fields,” in Organization Theory and Public Policy, HallR.H.QuinnR.E.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 147–161.
8.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review, 18: 147–160.
9.
EdelmanLauren B.1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Laws.” American Journal of Sociology, 97(6): 1531–1576.
10.
FredericksonH. George. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
GormanJack. 1989. The Gorman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities.Los Angeles: National Education Standards.
HaunschildP.R.BeckmanC.. 1997. When Do Interlocks Matter.? Alternative Sources of information and Interlock Influence. Technical Report. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
14.
MarchJames G.OlsenJohan P.. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations.Bergen: Universitetsfurleget.
15.
MeziasS.J.1990. “An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 431–457.
16.
OuchiW.G.1981. Theory Z.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
PalmerD.A.JenningsP.D.ZhouX.. 1993 “Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 100–131.
18.
PerryJames L.1995. “Ranking Public Administration Programs.” Journal of Public Administration Education, 1(2): 132–135.
19.
PowellW.W.DiMaggioP.J.1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
20.
RadaelliC.2000. “Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy.” Governance, 13(1): 25–44.
21.
RogersEverett M.1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition. New York, N.Y.: The Free Press of Glencoe.
22.
StrangDavid. 1997. “Cheap Talk: Managerial Discourse on Quality Circles as an Organizational Innovation.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
23.
StrangDavidSouleSarah A.. 1998. “Diffusions in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.” Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 265–290.
24.
SuchmanMark C.1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–609.
25.
Teasley IIIC. E.1995. “The Bad (U.S.) News Ranking of MPA Programs.” Journal of Public Administration Education, 1(2): 136–141.
26.
TracyJosephWaldfogelJoel. 1997. “The Best Business Schools: A Market-Based Approach.” Journal of Business, 70(1): 1–31
27.
TrieshmannJ. S.DennisA. R.NorthcroftC. B.NiemiA. W.. Forthcoming. “Serving Multiple Constituencies in the Business School: MBA Programs Versus Research Performance.” Academy of Management Journal.
28.
VentrissCurtis. 1995. “The Rating System: Determining What Constitutes a Quality Program.” Journal of Public Administration Education, 1(2): 142–153.