Can collaborative efforts by APSA, NASPAA, and ASPA play any role in advancing civic trust, civic capital, and civic engagement in the United States? This essay reviews how recent national commissions on these topics have by design or inadvertence attributed little role to bureaucracy in these matters. In the process, and unlike the early decades of the twentieth century, they have marginalized the practice and study of public administration when it comes to addressing issues of governance in this nation. To counter the misperception that public administration research, theory, and practice have little knowledge to offer on these topics, this essay offers a sampling of what they can contribute to this debate. It then offers specific collaborative efforts that the three associations might undertake to raise the salience of public administration in future debates over governance issues in the twenty-first century.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
APSA Task Force on Civic Education. 1997. “Task Force to Set Agenda for Civic Education Program.” PS: Political Science and PoliticsXXX(4):744.
2.
BarrS.1998. “Vote of Support for Employees: Civil Servants Favored Over Politicians, 67 Percent to 16 Percent.” The Washington Post, March 10: A15.
3.
BermanE. M.1997. “Dealing With Cynical Citizens.” Public Administration Review57(2): 105–112.
4.
BerryJ. M.PortneyK. E.ThomsonK.1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
5.
BrehmJ.RahnW.1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science41(3): 999–1023.
6.
BroderD. S.1998. “Trust in Government Edges Up: State of Nation, Attitude Toward Leaders Are Key, Survey Finds.” The Washington Post, March 10:A15.
7.
BrudneyJeffrey. 1990. Fostering Volunteer Programs in the Public Sector: Planning, Initiating, and Managing Voluntary Activities.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
8.
Bureau of Land Management/Center for the Rocky Mountain West. 1997. Collaborative Planning Workshop: Moving to Action in Making Community-Based Land Use Decisions. June.
9.
CarterL. H.ElshtainJ. B.1997. “Task Force on Civic Education Statement of Purpose.” PS: Political Science and PoliticsXXX(4): 745.
10.
CawleyR. M.1998. “Collaborative Stewardship and the Bureau of Land Management.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, September.
11.
DurantR. F.1995. “The Democratic Deficit in America.” Political Science Quarterly110(1):25–47.
12.
DurantR. F.1998. “Agenda Setting, the Third Wave, and the Administrative State.” Administration and Society30(3): 211–247.
13.
FarazmandA.1998. “Building a Community-Based Administrative State.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, September.
14.
FishkinJ. S.1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform.New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
FredericksonH. G.1980. The New Public Administration.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
16.
FredericksonH. G.1997. “Facing the Community.” The Kettering Review December: 28–37.
17.
FreemuthJ.1998. “The Legitimacy Crisis in Federal Land Policy: The Case of Collaborative Stewardship.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, September.
18.
GawthropL. C.1984. “Civis, Civitas and Civilitas: A New Focus for the Year 2000.” Public Administration Review44: 101–107.
19.
GolembiewskiR. T.1977. “A Critique of Democratic Administration' and Its Supporting Ideation.” American Political Science ReviewLXXI(4): 1488–1507.
20.
GoodsellC.T.1994. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
21.
GormleyW.1993. “Counter-Bureaucracies in Theory and Practice.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September.
22.
HammerM.1996. Beyond Reengineering: How the Process-Centered Organization is Changing Our Work and Our Lives.New York: Harper Business.
23.
HarwoodP.WilliamsD.1998. “Collaborative Planning in BLM: A Different View of Communities and the BLM.” Natural Resources and Environmental Administration19(2): 5–7.
24.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE.1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions.New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
IngramH. M.SmithS. R.1993. Public Policy for Democracy.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
26.
JohnD.1994. Civic Environmentalism: Alternatives to Regulation in States and Communities.Washington: CQ Press.
27.
KaganR. A.1995 “Adversarial Legalism and American Government.” In LandyM. K.LevinM A., The New Politics of Public Policy (Chapter 4). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
LandyM. K.1995. “The New Politics of Environmental Policy.” In LandyM. K.LevinM.A.The New Politics of Public Policy (pp. 207–227). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
LightP. C.1995. Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
30.
LipskyM.1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
MathewsD.1994. Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32.
MelnickR. S.1995. “Separation of Powers and the Strategy of Rights: The Expansion of Special Education.” In LandyM. K.LevinM.A., The New Politics of Public Policy.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
MoroneJ. A.1991. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government.New York: Basic Books.
OsborneD.PlastrikP.1997. Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
36.
PetersB. G.1998. “Community-Based Administrative State: A Comparative Perspective.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, September.
37.
RauchJ.1995. Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government.New York: Times Books.
38.
RohrJ. A.1986. To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State.Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
39.
SandelM. J.1996. Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
SaulJ. R.1997. The Unconscious Civilization.New York: The Free Press.
StokerR. P.1989. “A Regime Framework for Implementation Analysis: Cooperation and Reconciliation of Federalist Imperatives.” Policy Studies Review9(1): 29–49.
47.
StreibG.1990. “Dusting Off a Forgotten Management Tool: The Citizen Survey.” Public Management72: 17–19.
48.
ThomasJ. C.1995. Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
49.
TofflerA.1980. The Third Wave.New York: Bantam Books.
50.
TolchinS. J.1996. The Angry American: How Voter Rage Is Changing the Nation.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
WatsonD.J.JusterR.J.JohnsonG.W.1991. “Institutionalized Use of Citizen Surveys in the Budgetary and Policy-making Processes: A Small City Case Study.” Public Administration Review51(3): 232–239.
