BloomB.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.NY: David McKay Publishing.
2.
BoyerE. L. (1991). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3.
FeichtnerS. B.DavisE. A.. (1985). “Why Groups Fail: A Survey of Student Experiences with Learning Groups.” The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9: 58–73.
4.
FeldmanD. C. (1984). The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms. Academy of Management Review, 9(1):47–53.
5.
KoehlerJ.WPankowskiJ. M.. 1996. Teams in Government.Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
6.
LightR.J. (1990). The Harvard Assessment Seminars: Explorations with Students and Faculty about Teaching, Learning and Student Life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
7.
LightR.J. (1992). The Harvard Assessment Seminars: Explorations with Students and Faculty about Teaching, Learning and Student Life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
8.
MichaelsenL. K.WatsonW. E.BlackR. H.. 1989. A Realistic Test of Individual Versus Group Consensus Decision Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5): 834–839.
9.
MichaelsenL. K.1992. Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education. In WulffD. H.NyquistJ.D., To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development.Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press Co.
10.
MichaelsenL. K.1994. Classroom Organization and Management: Making a Case for the Small-Group Option. In PritchardK W.SawyerR. M., Handbook of College Teaching: Theory and Applications.Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
11.
MichaelsenL. K.1995. “Team Based Learning.” Paper and accompanying materials presented at the Organizational Behavior Teaching Society Conference, Keene, NH.
12.
ShawM. E.1981. Group Dynamics. The Psychology of Small Group Behavior.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
ShermanS.1993. “A Brave New Darwinian Workplace.” Fortune, January 25, 51–56.
14.
ZajacG.Al-KazemiA.. 1997. “Reinventing Government and Redefining Leadership.” Public Productivity and Management Review, 20(4): 372–383.