Connectedness is placed at the heart of the recovery process in mental health care. However, in regard to persons labeled not criminally responsible (NCR), considerations of recovery and connectedness remain in the background. The aim of this study is to understand and explore how individuals labeled not criminally responsible experience connectedness.
Research method
Sixty-seven in-depth interviews were examined and thematically analyzed.
Results
Interviews revealed emotional, functional and personal connectedness as categories of connectedness, each with different qualitative determinants.
Conclusion
This study shows that connectedness should be considered as an essential ingredient of the recovery process by practitioners as well as policy makers. We recommend a shift from an individualistic, punitive approach toward a recovery-supportive rhetoric and more ‘shared decision making’ between service users and providers at all levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgaN.Vander LaenenF.VandeveldeS.VermeerschE., & VanderplasschenW. (2017). Recovery of offenders formerly labeled as not criminally responsible: Uncovering the ambiguity from first-person narratives. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(6), 919–939. 10.1177/0306624X17730617
2.
AgaN.VandeveldeS.Van der LaenenF., & VanderplasschenW. (2020). A qualitative inquiry on recovery needs and resources of individuals with intellectual disabilities labelled not criminally responsible. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(4), 673–685. 10.1111/jar.12670
3.
AndrewsD. A., & BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Routeledge.
4.
AnthonyW. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. 10.1037/h0095655
5.
AskolaR. A.LouherantaO.PaavilainenE.Åstedt-KurkiP.SoininenP.PutkonenH., & NikkonenM. (2015). Forensic psychiatric patients' narratives of their offense. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 36(3), 162–170. 10.3109/01612840.2014.969391
6.
BaumeisterR. F., & LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
BestD. W.GhufranS.DayE.RayR., & LoaringJ. (2008). Breaking the habit: A retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27(6), 619–624. 10.1080/09595230802392808
9.
BestD. W.HallL., & MusgroveA. (2018). The bridge between social identity and community capital on the path to recovery and desistance. Probation Journal, 65(4), 394–406. 10.1177/0264550518790677
10.
BlackburnR. (2004). What works” with mentally disordered offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 297–308.
11.
Boyatzis, R. (1998).Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
BroekaertE.VanderplasschenW.ColpaertK., & AutriqueM. (2010). The Human Prerogative: A critical analysis of evidence-based and other paradigms of care in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatric Quarterly, 81(3), 227–238. 10.1007/s11126-010-9132-4
13.
CasselmanJ. (2015). The interment law in an historical perspective. Will this Sisyphean task ever come to an end. ? In CasselmanJ.De RyckeR. & HeimansH. (Eds.), Internment. New internment law and organisation of care (pp. 5–25). Antwerpen.
14.
ClaesL. (2014). Persons with an intellectual disability in a blocked situation: A research on life trajectories from a cross-fertilization of the theoretical perspectives of Disability Studies and Social & Cultural Geography. Orthopedagogical Series.
15.
CobigoV.MaharA., & StuartH. (2012). Belonging: What does it mean to belong?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(7), 806.
16.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. 10.1086/228943
17.
ColmanC., & Vander LaenenF. (2012). “Recovery came first”: Desistance versus recovery in the criminal careers of drug-using offenders. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 657671. 10.1100/2012/657671
18.
ColmanC., & Vander LaenenF. (2017). The desistance process of offenders who misuse drugs. In HartE. L. & van GinnekenF. J. C. (Eds.), New perspectives on desistance: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 61–84). Palgrave.
19.
CorstensD.LongdenE.McCarthy-JonesS.WaddinghamR., & ThomasN. (2014). Emerging perspectives from the hearing voices movement: Implications for research and practice. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(Suppl_4), S285–S294. 10.1093/schbul/sbu007
20.
De PauM.MertensA.BourmorckD.VanderplasschenW.NicaiseP., & Vander LaenenF. (2020). Crushed by the Belgian system: Lived experiences of forensic care trajectories by persons labelled as not criminally responsible. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 68, 101539. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101539
21.
De RuysscherC. (2019). Unraveling recovery: A qualitative study rooted in the lived experiences of persons with complex mental health needs. Ghent University, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences.
22.
DeeganP. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11–19. 10.1037/h0099565
23.
DolmanC.JonesI., & HowardL. M. (2013). Pre-conception to parenting: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature on motherhood for women with severe mental illness. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 16(3), 173–196. 10.1007/s00737-013-0336-0
24.
DorkinsE., & AdsheadG. (2011). Working with offenders: Challenges to the recovery agenda. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 17(3), 178–187. 10.1192/apt.bp.109.007179
25.
DoroudN.FosseyE., & FortuneT. (2018). Place for being, doing, becoming and belonging: A meta-synthesis exploring the role of place in mental health recovery. Health & Place, 52, 110–120. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.05.008
EversE. (2007). Kwalitatief interviewen. Kunst en Kunde. Lemma.
28.
FarrallS., & MarunaS. (2004). Desistance-focussed criminal justice policy research: Introduction to a special issue on desistance from crime and public policy. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 358–367. 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00335.x
29.
FazelS.HayesA. J.BartellasK.ClericiM., & TrestmanR. (2016). Mental health of prisoners: Prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 3(9), 871–881. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30142-0
30.
FazelS.RameshT., & HawtonK. (2017). Suicide in prisons: An international study of prevalence and contributory factors. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(12), 946–952. 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30430-3
31.
FeredayJ., & Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. 10.1177/160940690600500107
32.
FerritoM.VetereA.AdsheadG., & MooreE. (2012). Life after homicide: Accounts of recovery and redemption of offender patients in a high security hospital–a qualitative study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(3), 327–344.
33.
FonagyP., & LevinsonA. (2004). Offending and attachment: The relationship between interpersonal awareness and offending in a prison population with psychiatric disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12(2), 225–251.
34.
GordonH., & LindqvistP. (2007). Forensic psychiatry in Europe. Psychiatric Bulletin, 31(11), 421–424. 10.1192/pb.bp.107.014803
35.
GreenT.BatsonA., & GudjonssonG. (2011). The development and initial validation of a service-user led measure for recovery of mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(2), 252–265. 10.1080/14789949.2010.541271
36.
GullifordM.NaithaniS., & MorganM. (2006). What is 'continuity of care'?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(4), 248–250. 10.1258/135581906778476490
37.
HallE. (2013). Making and gifting belonging: Creative arts and people with learning disabilities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(2), 244–262. 10.1068/a44629
38.
HeimansH.Vander BekenT., & SchipaanboordA. E. (2015). Finally a real new and good internment law? Part 1: The legal phase. Rechtskundig Weekblad, 67(27), 1043–1063.
39.
HirschiT. (2004). Self-control and crime. In BaumeisterR. F. & VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 537–552). Guilford Press.
40.
HubandN.FurtadoV.SchelS.EckertM.CheungN.BultenE., & VöllmB. (2018). Characteristics and needs of long-stay forensic psychiatric inpatients: A rapid review of the literature. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(1), 45–60. 10.1080/14999013.2017.1405124
41.
JacobsonN. (2004). In recovery: The making of mental health policy. Vanderbilt University Press.
42.
JeandarmeI.HabetsP.OeiT. I., & BogaertsS. (2016). Reconviction and revocation rates in Flanders after medium security treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 45–52. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.033
43.
LeamyM.BirdV.Le BoutillierC.WilliamsJ., & SladeM. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry : The Journal of Mental Science, 199(6), 445–452. 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733
44.
LeBelT. P. (2012). Invisible stripes? Formerly incarcerated persons’ perceptions of stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33(2), 89–107. 10.1080/01639625.2010.538365
45.
LeeR. M., & RobbinsS. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338–345. 10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.338
46.
LoflandJ., & LoflandL. H. (1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
47.
LurigioA. J., & SwartzJ. A. (2000). Changing the contours of the criminal justice system to meet the needs of persons with serious mental illness. Criminal Justice, 3, 45–108.
48.
MacDonaldS. A. B., & MichaudA. A. D. (2015). Social exclusion in a mental health court?Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice, 4(2), 51–75.
49.
MarunaS.ImmarigeonR., & LeBelT. (2004). Ex-offender reintegration: Theory and practice. In MarunaS. & ImmarigeonR. (Eds.), After crime and punishment (pp. 3–27). Willan.
50.
MaslowA. H. (1962). Towards a psychology of being. D. Van Nostrand Company.
51.
McNeillF. (2016). Desistance and criminal justice in Scotland. In CroallH.MooneyG., & MunroR. (Eds.), Crime, Justice and Society in Scotland (pp. 200–216). Routledge.
52.
McWadeB. (2016). Recovery-as-policy as a form of neoliberal state making. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice, 5(3), 62–81.
53.
MezeyG., & EastmanN. (2009). Choice and social inclusion in forensic psychiatry: Acknowledging mixed messages and double think. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(4), 503–508. 10.1080/14789940903178023
54.
MezzinaR.DavidsonL.BorgM.MarinI.ToporA., & SellsD. (2006). The social nature of recovery: Discussion and implications for practice. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 9(1), 63–80. 10.1080/15487760500339436
MoffittT. E.PoultonR., & CaspiA. (2013). Lifelong impact of early self-control. American Scientist, 101(5), 352.
57.
MortelmansD. (2011). Qualitative analysis with Nvivo. Acco.
58.
NaertJ.RooseR.RappR. C., & VanderplasschenW. (2017). Continuity of care in youth services: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 75, 116–126. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.027
59.
Nijdam‐JonesA.LivingstonJ. D.Verdun‐JonesS., & BrinkJ. (2015). Using social bonding theory to examine 'recovery' in a forensic mental health hospital: A qualitative study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health : Cbmh, 25(3), 157–168. 10.1002/cbm.1918
60.
NugentB., & SchinkelM. (2016). The pains of desistance. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 568–584. 10.1177/1748895816634812
61.
O’HaganM. (2004). Guest editorial recovery in New Zealand: Lessons for Australia?Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health ( Health), 3(1), 5–7. 10.5172/jamh.3.1.5
62.
OnkenS. J.DumontJ. M.RidgwayP.DornanD. H., & RalphR. O. (2002). Mental health recovery: What helps and what hinders? A national research project for the development of recovery facilitating system performance indicators. Phase one research report: A national study of consumer perspectives on what helps and hinders mental health recovery. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) National Technical Assistance Center (NTAC).
63.
OslerA., & StarkeyH. (2002). Education for citizenship: Mainstreaming the fight against racism?European Journal of Education, 37(2), 143–159. 10.1111/1467-3435.00099
64.
PattersonJ. E., & EdwardsT. M. (2018). An introduction to global mental health. Families, Systems & Health : The Journal of Collaborative Family Healthcare, 36(2), 137–143. 10.1037/fsh0000360
65.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
66.
PfäfflinF., & AdsheadG. (2004). A matter of security. The application of attachment theory to forensic psychiatry and psychotherapy. Jessica Kingsley.
67.
PonceA. N., & RoweM. (2018). Citizenship and community mental health care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 22–31. 10.1002/ajcp.12218
68.
PowerA. (2013). Making space for belonging: Critical reflections on the implementation of personalised adult social care under the veil of meaningful inclusion. Social Science & Medicine (1982)), 88, 68–75. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.008
69.
Price-RobertsonR.ObradovicA., & MorganB. (2017). Relational recovery: Beyond individualism in the recovery approach. Advances in Mental Health, 15(2), 108–120. 10.1080/18387357.2016.1243014
70.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2016). NVivo version Pro 11.
71.
RogersR. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.008
72.
RudeS. S., & BurhamB. L. (1995). Connectedness and neediness: Factors of the DEQ and SAS dependency scales. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 19(3), 323–340.
73.
SaleebeyD. (2005). The strengths perspective in social work practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
74.
SayceL. (2001). Social inclusion and mental health. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25(4), 121–123. 10.1192/pb.25.4.121
75.
SchalockR. L. (2004). The emerging disability paradigm and its implications for policy and practice. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(4), 204–215. 10.1177/10442073040140040201
76.
SeckerJ.MembreyH.GroveB., & SeebohmP. (2002). Recovering from illness or recovering your life? Implications of clinical versus social models of recovery from mental health problems for employment support services. Disability & Society, 17(4), 403–418. 10.1080/09687590220140340
77.
SeynnaeveK.MoyensM., & DheedeneJ. (2018). Internering in een veranderend zorglandschap: Wat zijn de vaststellingen na een jaar nieuwe wet op de internering?Panopticon, 39(3), 241–250.
78.
SheridanA.O’KeeffeD.CoughlanB.FrazerK.DrennanJ., & KempleM. (2018). Friendship and money: A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of participating in a supported socialisation programme. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 64(4), 326–334. 10.1177/0020764018763692
79.
Silva-SmithA. L., & KovachC. R. (2006). Positive gain: Rethinking the outcomes of dependency. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 32(5), 36–41. 10.3928/00989134-20060501-07
80.
SmithB. T.PadgettD. K.Choy-BrownM., & HenwoodB. F. (2015). Rebuilding lives and identities: The role of place in recovery among persons with complex needs. Health & Place, 33, 109–117. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.03.002
81.
SoderstromI. R. (2007). Mental illness in offender populations: Prevalence, duty and implications. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(1–2), 1–17. 10.1300/J076v45n01_01
82.
StuartS. R.TanseyL., & QuayleE. (2017). What we talk about when we talk about recovery: A systematic review and best-fit framework synthesis of qualitative literature. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 26(3), 291–304. 10.1080/09638237.2016.1222056
83.
SvennerlindC.NilssonT.KerekesN.AndinéP.LagerkvistM.ForsmanA.AnckarsäterH., & MalmgrenH. (2010). Mentally disordered criminal offenders in the Swedish criminal system. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 220–226. 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.003
84.
TaylorJ.ConveryI., & BartonE. (2013). Social connectedness and female offending. Forensic Update, 111, 10–16.
85.
TownsendK. C., & McWhirterB. T. (2005). Connectedness: A review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment, and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(2), 191–201. 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00596.x
86.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ., & SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 9(5), 584–590. 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
87.
van der Stel, J. (2012).Focus op persoonlijk herstel bij psychische problemen. Den Haag/ Boom: Lemma uitgevers.
88.
VandeveldeS.Vander LaenenF.Van DammeL.VanderplasschenW.AudenaertK.BroekaertE., & Vander BekenT. (2017). Dilemmas in applying strengths-based approaches in working with offenders with mental illness: A critical multidisciplinary review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 71–79. 10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.008
89.
VöllmB. A.ClarkeM.HerrandoV. T.SeppänenA. O.GosekP.HeitzmanJ., & BultenE. (2018). European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 51, 58–73. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.007
90.
WardT., & BrownM. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1080/10683160410001662744
91.
WardT.MannR. E., & GannonT. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 87–107. 10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.004
WardT., & StewartC. (2003). Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(2), 125–224. 10.1080/1068316031000116247
94.
WHOQoL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.
95.
WilliamsA.MooreE.AdsheadG.McDowellA., & TappJ. (2011). Including the excluded: High security hospital user perspectives on stigma, discrimination, and recovery. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13(3), 197–204. 10.1108/14636641111157841
96.
WoodB. E., & BlackR. (2018). Spatial, relational and affective understandings of citizenship and belonging for young people today: Towards a new conceptual framework. In HalseC. (Ed.), Interrogating belonging for Yyoung people in schools (pp. 165–185). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-319-75217-4_8
97.
WroschC.ScheierM. F.CarverC. S., & SchulzR. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2(1), 1–20. 10.1080/15298860309021
