While Indigenous peoples account for a small portion of the Canadian population, they are overrepresented in the Canadian Criminal Justice System. Research and case law suggest culture should always be considered in violence risk assessments (VRAs), but it is unknown whether this recommendation is followed. The present study examined the role of Indigenous versus non-Indigenous culture in judicial opinions regarding evaluators’ VRA and expert witness testimony in Dangerous Offender and Long-Term Offender (DO/LTO) hearings under Canadian Law. 214 DO/LTO hearings from 2009-2016 where judges commented on VRAs submitted to the court were systematically identified via the Canadian Legal Information Institute database. Judicial comments were analyzed in cases with Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants for discussions of culture and the prevalence of comments regarding qualities of the evaluator(s), qualities of the VRA(s) completed, and qualities of the evaluators’ expert testimony about the VRA. Judges considered culture meaningfully in 64% of Indigenous offenders’ cases. Discussion of VRA tools’ content was significantly more frequent in non-Indigenous cases; otherwise, frequency of non-cultural themes did not vary between case groups. Given the importance of considering culture in VRA, it is concerning that culture was considered in just over half of cases; improving this deficit is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. 10.1037/a0029889
2.
BaileyK. A. (2016). Racism within the Canadian university: Indigenous students’ experiences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(7), 1261–1279. 10.1080/01419870.2015.1081961
3.
BlaisJ. (2015). Preventative detention decisions: Reliance on expert assessments and evidence of partisan allegiance within the Canadian context. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 74–91. 10.1002/bsl.2155
4.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being ScheduleB to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), (1982). c 11.
5.
Canada Privy Council Office (2019). Reclaiming power and place: Final report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls.
6.
CookA. N., & HartS. D. (2017). Violence risk assessment across nations and across cultures: Legal, clinical, and scientific considerations. In RoeschR. and CookA. N. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic mental health services. Routledge.
7.
Corrections and Conditional Release Act, S.C. (1992). c. 20
DouglasK. S., & BelfrageH. (2015). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment and management: Why it is useful, how to use it, and its empirical support. In PietzC. A. & MattsonC. A. (Eds.), Violent offenders: Understanding and assessment (pp. 360–383). Oxford University Press.
FleissJ. L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sons.
15.
GutierrezL.HelmusL. M., & HansonR. K. (2016). What we know and don’t know about risk assessment with offenders of indigenous heritage. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 97–106. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1037/tam0000064
16.
HaagA. M.BoyesA.ChengJ.MacNeilA., & WiroveR. ( (2016). Ewert v. Canada: International implications for cultural consideration for threat assessment [Special issue]. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 65–75. Ed.) 10.1037/tam0000067
17.
HaagA. M.BoyesA.ChengJ.MacNeilA., & WiroveR. (2016). An introduction to the issues of cross-cultural assessment inspired by Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 65–75. 10.1037/tam0000067
18.
HartS. D. (2016). Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 76–96. 10.1037/tam0000068
19.
HeilbrunK. (2009). Evaluation for risk of violence in adults. Oxford University Press.
20.
HicksJ. W. (2004). Ethnicity, race, and forensic psychiatry: Are we color-blind?The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(1), 21–33.
21.
HsiehH., & ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. 10.1177/1049732305276687
22.
JacksonN. (2015). The substantive application of Gladue in dangerous offender proceedings: Reassessing risk and rehabilitation for aboriginal offenders. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 20(1), 77–91.
23.
KnappS. J., & VandeCreekL. D. (2006). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach. American Psychological Association.
24.
KwartnerP. P.LyonsP. M., & BoccacciniM. T. (2006). Judges' risk communication preferences in risk for future violence cases. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 185–194. 10.1080/14999013.2006.10471242
25.
MonchalinL. (2010). Canadian Aboriginal peoples’ victimization, offending and its prevention: Gathering the evidence. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 12(2), 119–132. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1057/cpcs.2009.23
26.
NichollsT. L.PetersenK. L., & PritchardM. M. (2016). Comparing preferences for actuarial versus structured professional judgment violence risk assessment measures across five continents: To what extent is practice keeping pace with science?. In SinghJ. P.BjørklyS., & FazelS. (Eds.), International perspectives on violence risk assessment (pp. 127–149). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.003.0008
27.
OlverM. E. (2016). Some considerations on the use of actuarial and related forensic measures with diverse correctional populations. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 107–121. 10.1037/tam0000065
28.
OlverM. E.NeumannC. S.SewallL. A.LewisK.HareR. D., & WongS. C. P. (2018). A comprehensive examination of the psychometric properties of the hare psychopathy checklist-revised in a Canadian multisite sample of indigenous and non-indigenous offenders. Psychological Assessment, 30(6), 779–792. https://doi.org/proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1037/pas0000533.supp
29.
OlverM. E.NeumannC. S.WongS. P., & HareR. D. (2013). The structural and predictive properties of the psychopathy Checklist-revised in Canadian aboriginal and non-aboriginal offenders. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 167–179. 10.1037/a0029840
30.
OlverM. E.SowdenJ. N.KingstonD. A.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA.Beggs ChristoffersonS. M., & WongS. C. P. (2018). Predictive accuracy of violence risk scale–sexual offender version risk and change scores in treated Canadian aboriginal and non-aboriginal sexual offenders. Sexual. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(3), 254–275. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1177/1079063216649594
31.
Public Safety Canada (2019, August 19). 2018 Corrections and Conditional Release Statistical Overview.
32.
Public Safety Canada. (2018, January 24). The Investigation, Prosecution and Correctional Management of High-Risk Offenders: A National Guide.
33.
Riggs RomaineC. L., & KavanaughA. (2019). Risks, benefits, and complexities: Reporting race & ethnicity in forensic mental health reports. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(2), 138–152. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1080/14999013.2018.1531094
34.
GladueR. v. [ (1999). ] 1 S.C.R. 688
35.
IpeeleeR. v. [ (2012). ] S.C.C. 13
36.
PikeR. v. (2010). [] B.C.C.A. 401
37.
ShepherdS. M. (2016). Violence risk instruments may be culturally unsafe for use with indigenous patients. Australasian Psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 24(6), 565–567. 10.1177/1039856216665287
ShepherdS. M., & Lewis-FernandezR. (2016). Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity: Contemporary challenges and future directions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 427–438. https://doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1037/law0000102
40.
Statistics Canada (2017, October 25). Aboriginal peoples in Canada: Key results from the 2016 Census.
41.
Statistics Canada (2019). Ethnic Origin (279), Single and Multiple Ethnic Origin Responses (3), Generation Status (4), Age (12) and Sex (3) for the Population in Private Households of Canada, Provinces and Territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations, 2016 Census - 25% Sample Data.
42.
StoreyJ. E.CampbellV. J., & HartS. D. (2013). Expert evidence about violence risk assessment: A study of Canadian legal decisions. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12(4), 287–296. 10.1080/14999013.2013.867383
43.
ThompsonJ. (2016). Reconsidering the burden of proof in dangerous offender law: Canadian jurisprudence, risk assessment and aboriginal offenders. Saskatchewan Law Review, 79(1), 49–78.
44.
TrevethanS.CrutcherN., & MooreJ.-P. (2002). A profile of federal offenders designated as dangerous offenders or serving long-term supervision orders. Research Report No. R-125. : Correctional Service of Canada.
45.
TrudeauJ. P. (2017, June 21). Statement by the Prime Minister of Canada on national aboriginal day. Speech presented at National Aboriginal Day in Ontario.
46.
WilsonH. A., & GutierrezL. (2014). Does one size fit all?: A meta-analysis examining the predictive ability of the level of service inventory (LSI) with aboriginal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 196–219. 10.1177/0093854813500958
