This article provides a framework for the application of science-based interview methods to interviews conducted in both criminal and intelligence interview contexts. In these contexts, subjects frequently are antagonistic and many have experienced some kind of trauma. Similar to mental health professionals who conduct face-to-face interviews in prisons and hospitals, there is the need to gain as much valid and useful information as possible to make informed decisions. Our framework consists of three phases: in-depth planning, engagement, and sensemaking. We include a description of moments of a real-life criminal interview to illustrate the framework, and then briefly address some of the cultural and ethical challenges inherent to this domain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbeA.BrandonS. E. (2014). Building and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews. Police Practice and Research, 15(3), 207–220. doi:10.1080/15614263.2013.827835
2.
AlisonL. J.AlisonE.NooneG.ElntibS.ChristiansenP. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 19(4), 411–431. doi:10.1037/a0034564
3.
AlisonL. J.AlisonE.NooneG.ElntibS.WaringS.ChristiansenP. (2014a). The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter-interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20(4), 421–430. doi:10.1037/law0000021
4.
AlisonL. J.AlisonE.NooneG.ElntibS.WaringS.ChristiansenP. (2014b). Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counterinterrogaton tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.031
5.
AltmanI.TaylorD. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
AmbadyN.BernieriF. J.RichesonJ. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80006-4
7.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 181–256. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
8.
AuneR. K.WatersL. L. (1994). Cultural differences in deception: Motivations to deceive in Samoans and North Americans. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(2), 159–172. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(94)90026-4
9.
BondC. F.DePauloB. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
10.
BrandonS.ArthurJ.RayD.MeissnerC.RussanoM.WellsS.KleinmanS. (2018). Enhancing Practise Through Science. Manuscript submitted for Publication.
11.
BrandonS. E.WellsS.SealeC. (2017). Science-based interviewing: Information elicitation. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15, 133–148. doi:10.1002/jip.1496
12.
BullR.MilneB. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In LassiterG. D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Medford MA: Springer Science & Business Media.
13.
BurkeB. L.ArkowitzH.MencholaM. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843–861. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843
14.
ByrneD.GriffittW. (1966). Similarity versus liking: A clarification. Psychonomic Science, 6(6), 295–296.
15.
CesarioJ. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 40–48. doi:10.1177/1745691613513470
16.
ChaikinA. L.DerlegaV. J.MillerS. J. (1976). Effects of room environment on self-disclosure in a counseling analogue. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23(5), 479.
17.
CialdiniR. (2007). The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins Business Essentials.
18.
CialdiniR. (2016). Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade. New York, NK: Simon & Schuster.
19.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79, 72–81.
ColombC.GinetM.WrightD.DemarchiS.SadlerC. (2013). Back to the real: Efficacy and perception of a modified cognitive interview in the field. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 574–583. doi:10.1002/acp.2942
22.
DandoC.WilcockR.MilneR.HenryL. (2009). A modified cognitive interview protocol for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 698–716.
23.
DavisM. R.McMahonM.GreenwoodK. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time‐critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 75–93. doi:10.1002/acp.1048
24.
DavisD.VillalobosJ. G.SorefA.MikulincerM. (2016). Priming states of mind can affect disclosure of threatening self-information: Effects of self-affirmation, mortality salience, and attachment orientations. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 351–361. doi:10.1037/lhb0000184
25.
DawsonE.HartwigM.BrimbalL. (2015). Interviewing to elicit information: Using priming to promote disclosure. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 443–450. doi:10.1037/lhb0000136
26.
DawsonE.HartwigM.BrimbalL.DenisenkovP. (2017). A room with a view: Setting influences information disclosure in investigative interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 333. doi:10.1037/lhb0000244
27.
DoneyP. M.CannonJ. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251829
28.
DonohueW. A.RobertoA. J. (1996). An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(3), 209–229. doi:10.1108/eb022782
29.
EagleyA.ChaikinS. (1975). An attributional analysis of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 136–144.
30.
FischhoffB. (1975). Hindsight foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 288–299.
31.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques in Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield IL: C.C. Thomas.
32.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E. (2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004
33.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E.RaymondD. S.JurkevichL. M. (1987). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 15, 291–297.
34.
FisherR. P.MilneR.BullR. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19. doi:10.1177/0963721410396826
35.
FiskeS. T. (2004). Social Beings. New York, NY: Wiley.
36.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
GeiselmanR. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30, 1–12.
38.
GeraertsE.BernsteinD. M.MerckelbachH.LindersC.RaymaekersL.LoftusE. F. (2008). Lasting beliefs and their behavioral consequences. Psychological Science, 19(8), 749–753. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02151.x
39.
GiebelsE.TaylorP. J. (2009). Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations: Persuasive arguments and cultural differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 5–19. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979
40.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332–346. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.332
41.
GlasgowR. E.LichtensteinE.MarcusA. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261
42.
Goodman-DelahuntyJ.MartschukN.DhamiM. K. (2014). Interviewing high values detainees: Securing cooperation and reliable disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883–897. doi:10.1002/acp.3087
43.
GranhagP. A.ClemensF.StrömwallL. A. (2009). The usual and the unusual suspects: Level of suspicion and counter-interrogation tactics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6(2), 129–137. doi:10.1002/jip.101
44.
GreccoE.RobbinsS. J.BartoliE.WolffE. F. (2013). Use of nonconscious priming to promote self-disclosure. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(3), 311–315. doi:10.1177/2167702612472176
45.
GudjonssonG. H. (2003). The psychology of Interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester UK: John Wiley.
46.
GudjonssonG. H.PeturssonH. (1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality?Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 295–306. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90116-S
47.
GudjonssonG. H.SigurdssonJ.EinarssonE. (2004). The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(2), 125–135.
48.
HartwigM.GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227.
49.
HartwigM.GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A.DoeringN. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3(1), 10–16.
50.
HartwigM.LukeT.SkerkerM. (2015). Ethical perspectives on interrogation: An analysis of contemporary techniques. In JacobsJ.JacksonJ. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of criminal justice ethics (pp. 326–347). London, UK: Routledge.
51.
HartwigM.MeissnerC. A.SemelM. D. (2014). Human intelligence interviewing and interrogation: Assessing the challenges of developing an ethical, evidence-based approach. In BullR. (Ed.), Investigative Interviewing (pp. 209–228). New York, NY: Springer.
52.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
53.
HeuerR. J. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis. Center for the Study of Intelligence. Berkshire, UK: Books Express Publishing.
HofmannS. G.AsnaaniA.VonkI. J.SawyerA. T.FangA. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9595-3
56.
HolmbergU.ChristiansonS. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45. doi:10.1002/bsl.470
57.
JohnstonL. (1996). Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(5), 799–825.
58.
KassinS. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221
59.
KassinS. M. (2006). A critical appraisal of modern police interrogations. Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 207–227). Collompton Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
60.
KassinM.ApplebyS. C.PerilloJ. T. (2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 39–55. doi:10.1348/135532509X449361
61.
KassinS. M.NorwickR. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 211–221. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022323.74584.f5
62.
KebbellM.HurrenE. J.MazerolleP. (2006). Sex offenders’ perceptions of how they were interviewed. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 4, 67–75.
63.
KellyC. E.MillerJ. C.RedlichD. (2016). The dynamic nature of interrogations. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 295–309. doi:10.1037/lhb0000172
64.
KlatzkyR. L.CreswellJ. D. (2014). An intersensory interaction account of priming effects – and their absence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 49–58. doi:10.1177/1745691613513468
65.
KöhnkenG.MilneR.MemonA.BullR. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 3–27. doi:10.1080/10683169908414991
66.
KnowlesE. S.LinnJ. A. (Eds.). (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Psychology Press: Church Rd, Hove, UK.
67.
LeoR. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: The changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law and Social Change, 18, 35–59.
68.
LeoR. A.OfsheR. J. (1998). Consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88(2), 429.
69.
LoftusE. F.PalmerJ. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589.
70.
LoganC. (2013). Risk assessment: Specialist interviewing skills for forensic practitioners. In LoganC.JohnstoneL. (Eds.), Managing clinical risk:A guide to effective practice. Oxford: Routledge.
71.
MannT. C.FergusonM. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. doi:10.1037/pspa0000021
72.
MannS.VrijA.ShawD.LealS.EwenS.HillmanJ.GranhagP.FisherR. (2013). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 324–340.
73.
MeissnerC.RussanoM.NarchetF. (2010). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. Police interrogations and false confessions (pp. 111–126). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/12085-007.
74.
MeissnerC. A.Surmon-BöhrF.OleszkiewiczS.AlisonL. J. (2017). Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: A review of the US government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 438. 10.1037/law0000136.
75.
MeyerJ.ReppucciN. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioural Science and The Law, 25(6), 757–780.
76.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
77.
MilneB.BullR. (Eds.) (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley series in psychology of crime, policing & law. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
78.
National Research Council (2011). Intelligence analysis for tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
79.
NemethC. J. (1986). Differential contribution of majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Review, 93(1), 20–23. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
80.
OfsheR. J.LeoR. A. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law Politics and Society, 16, 189–254.
81.
OrmerodT. C.BarrettE. C.TaylorP. J. (2005). Investigative sense-making in criminal contexts. In SchraagenJ.M.MilitelloL.G.OrmerodT.LipshitzR. (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition (pp. 81–102). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
82.
OrmerodT. C.DandoC. J. (2015). Finding a needle in a haystack: Toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 76–84. doi:10.1037/xge0000030
83.
OxburghG.OstJ. (2011). The use and efficacy of empathy in police interviews with suspects of sexual offences. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 178–188. doi:10.1002/jip.143
84.
PalenaN.CasoL.VrijA.OrtheyR. (2018). Detecting deception through small talk and comparable truth baselines. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15(2), 124–132. doi:10.1002/jip.1495
85.
PauloR. M.AlbuquerqueP. B.BullR. (2013). The enhanced cognitive interview: Towards a better use and understanding of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(3), 190–199.
86.
PearseJ.GudjonssonG. H.ClareI. C. H.RutterS. (1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8(1), 1–21.
87.
PowellB. J.McMillenJ. C.ProctorE. K.CarpenterC. R.GriffeyR. T.BungerA. C.YorkJ. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(2), 123–157.
88.
PutnamL. L.JonesT. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49(3), 171–191. doi:10.1080/03637758209376080
89.
RichardsonB. H.TaylorP. J.SnookB.ConchieS. M.BennellC. (2014). Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. doi:10.1037/lhb0000077
90.
RussanoM. B.MeissnerC. A.AtkinsonD. (2017). Training state and local law enforcement on science-based interrogation approaches: A training assessment and field validation study. HIG Researcher Day, Washington D.C.
91.
RussanoM.MeissnerC.AtkinsonD. (2018). Training science-based methods of interrogation to state and local law enforcement officers: A training evaluation and field validation study. Paper presented at the American Psychology Law Society, Atlanta GA.
92.
RussanoM. B.NarchetF. M.KleinmanS. M.MeissnerC. A. (2014). Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 847–859. doi:10.1002/acp.3069
93.
SeiterJ. S.BruschkeJ. (2007). Deception and emotion: The effects of motivation, relationship type, and sex on expected feelings of guilt and shame following acts of deception in United States and Chinese samples. Communication Studies, 58(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10510970601168624
94.
ShepherdE.GriffithsA. (2013). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
SkerkerM. (2010). An ethics of interrogation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
96.
SmithS. M.VelaE. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 203–220. doi:10.3758/BF03196157
97.
Solano-FloresG.LiM. (2009). Generalizability of cognitive interview‐based measures across cultural groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 9–18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00143.x
98.
SSCI Report (2014). Senate select committee on intelligence, committee study of the central intelligence agency’s interrogation and detention program. Retrieved from http://www.intelligence.senate.cog/study2014/sscistudy1.pdf, accessed 29 December 2017.
99.
StearnsG.MarciaT. (2014). personal communication). Tape-recorded interview of Gabriel Campos-Martinez. Los Angeles Police Department, CA.
100.
StrömwallL.GranhagP. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/10683160308138
101.
St-YvesM.MeissnerC. A. (2014). Interviewing suspects. In St-YvesM. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: The essentials (pp. 145–190). Toronto CA: Thomson Reuters Ltd.
102.
SwensonR. (2006). Educing information: Interrogation: Science and art, intelligence science board, phase 1 report. Washington DC: National Intelligence University Press.
103.
TaylorP. J. (2002). A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 7–48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00797.x
104.
TaylorP. J. (2014). The role of language in conflict and conflict resolution. In HoltgravesT. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 459–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press
105.
TaylorP. J.DonohueW. A. (2006). Hostage negotiation opens up. In TaylorP. J.DonohueW. A. (Eds.), The negotiator’s handbook (pp. 667–674). Chicago: American Bar Association.
106.
TaylorP. J.LarnerS.ConchieS. M.MenacereT. (2017). Culture moderates changes in linguistic self-presentation and detail provision when deceiving others. Royal Society Open Science, 4(6), 170128. doi:10.1098/rsos.170128
107.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
108.
VallanoJ. P.EvansJ. R.Schreiber-CompoN. S.KieckhaeferJ. M. (2015). Rapport-building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 369–380. doi:10.1002/acp.3115
109.
VrijA. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
110.
VrijA. (2016). Baselining as a lie detection method. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1112–1119.
111.
VrijA.LealS.MannS.DaltonG.JoE.ShaboltasA.HoustonK. (2017). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Acta Psychologica, 177, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.011.
112.
VrijA.MannS. (2001). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 187–203. doi:10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2<187::AID-ACP696 > 3.0.CO;2-A
113.
VrijA.MeissnerC. A.FisherR. P.KassinS. M.MorganC. A.III.KleinmanS. M. (2017). Psychological perspectives on interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 927–955. doi:10.1177/1745691617706515
WalshW. D.BullR. (2012). How do interviewers attempt to overcome suspects’ denials?. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 19(2), 151–168. doi:10.1080/13218719.2010.543756
116.
WarmelinkL.VrijA.MannS.GranhagP. A. (2013). Spatial and temporal details in intentions: A cue to detecting deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 101–106. doi:10.1002/acp.2878
117.
WellsS. (2014). Negotiating in a Terrorist Environment. In PearceJ., (Ed.), Terrorism Case Studies (pp. 144–167). Oxford: Wiley.
118.
WellsS. (2015). What Communication Skills Are Effective In Dealing With Antagonistic Situations: A Tale of Two Halves? Unpublished Thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
119.
WellsG. L.BradfieldA. L. (1998). Good, you identified the suspect: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
120.
WellsS.TaylorP.GiebelsE. (2013). Crisis Negotiation: From Suicide to Terrorism Intervention. In OlekalnsM.AdairW. (Eds.), Handbook of Negotiation Research (pp.473–498). Melbourne AU: Elgar, Edwards Publishing.
WoolfS. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 211–213.
123.
WyerN. A. (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28(1), 1–19. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.1
